Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 [70] 80 90 100 |
1381. ship skin and clothing enhancements to benefit pilots - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
See, this... ...this is why we really need a DISLIKE button.
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.20 07:03:52
|
1382. Wardec balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Joe Risalo wrote: Fair enough... Though, I will say the first quote you posted here is completely out of context. The two times I mentioned that word were in relation to two different things. First, the 'context' that it was written with focu...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.20 06:14:40
|
1383. Wardec balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Joe Risalo wrote: SurrenderMonkey wrote: I guess if you have no functional understanding of the word "context", and are only interested in making an argument that is disingenuous and deliberately obtuse, you might see it that way. Given...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.20 05:38:13
|
1384. Sticky:Dev blog: Skill trading in New Eden - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
MiSANTHR0PE wrote: SurrenderMonkey wrote: I'm pretty ambivalent regarding the entire notion of skill trading. I'm hard-pressed to really find anything overly objectionable (to me) about the idea itself. This part of the blog really stood out...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.20 04:58:20
|
1385. Wardec balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Joe Risalo wrote: The article has no direction as to whom it applies to. It is not geared towards those that wish to avoid a wardec. I guess if you have no functional understanding of the word "context", you might see it that way. Qu...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.20 04:00:45
|
1386. Mining Frigate Tree. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Remiel Pollard wrote: Paranoid Loyd wrote: How is this a 5 page thread? If any of you haven't had the pleasure of viewing the link in my sig, now is the time. HAHAHAHAHA!!! Pet CONCORD. OMG, my sides. Now just turn it on its side ...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.20 03:37:23
|
1387. A Thought Experiment: The Nuclear Option - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Anyura wrote: By long term, I'm thinking the disruption lasting somewhere between a couple of weeks to a month. So basically you're thinking of no-effort ways to troll the entire game at the click of a button.
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.20 02:54:08
|
1388. Wardec balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Joe Risalo wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Joe Risalo wrote: Daichi Yamato wrote: Rather timely: Among the Stars: War Hmmm... So, the best way to fight off a wardec in the current mechanic is to not fight at all.. Nope.. That's no...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.20 02:40:40
|
1389. High Sec Candidate - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Lorelei Ierendi wrote: Thanks for stopping by my thread! SurrenderMonkey wrote: I would like to know how the candidate can realistically label herself as a "high sec candidate" while simultaneously proposing changes that would clearly be d...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.20 01:17:24
|
1390. "That" time of year again. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Er... you know when you say, "Win or lose, I'm not going to run again," when it is apparent to everyone that you will not even enter the same zipcode as "winning" that we all understand it's just a bunch of face saving nonsense, right?
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.20 00:25:55
|
1391. High Sec Candidate - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Quote: Ganker: I would like at least a 50% chance of walking away from a gank. At the moment this is not the case. On my blog I mentioned changes to Concord that I would like to see. I would also like to see some changes to Ice Spawning (maybe ...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.20 00:11:05
|
1392. Wardec balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lann Shahni wrote: Well in the case of only placing 100k bounty, the defender would have lose a frigate and the war would end right then and there! For it to be anti-eve, I don't agree, adding a risk to the attack or a resin is not anti-eve!...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.19 23:53:53
|
1393. Regulate Plex Trade! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hairpins Blueprint wrote: Let's end vicious cycle of plex price ..... You do understand that, when your argument has been thoroughly and systematically disassembled by pretty much everyone else in the thread, merely repeating yourself like ...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.19 23:35:58
|
1394. "That" time of year again. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Is this guy still clinging to the "if they only knew me they'd elect me/listen to my idea and share them" idea? CCP please make a pop up telling people ingame about the CSM. I want to see this mental house of cards crash and ...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.19 23:27:00
|
1395. Wardec balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lann Shahni wrote: While this "lesson" in terminology has been fun! ;) I fear we are getting of topic again! As before we are debating if the current wardec system is balanced, I argue that it is not, and have suggested an alternative, And som...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.19 23:23:03
|
1396. Sticky:Dev blog: Skill trading in New Eden - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I'm pretty ambivalent regarding the entire notion of skill trading. I'm hard-pressed to really find anything overly objectionable (to me) about the idea itself. This part of the blog really stood out to me, however: Quote: The blog sparked a r...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.19 22:17:57
|
1397. Delay in map data. - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
Kennedy Lincoln wrote: I posted this in the complaint / fixes forum yet I did not receive any replies. Why should we rely on the map data if the number of pilots and the number of kills is not current? WHy even have this function? I lost a 60...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.19 20:48:41
|
1398. "That" time of year again. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: SurrenderMonkey wrote: ... I stand upon the mathematical reality of STV .... You stand on the belief that the system can't be gamed. And why wouldn't I? It is not as if anyone has suggested a compelling, fac...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.19 20:14:47
|
1399. "That" time of year again. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: SurrenderMonkey wrote: Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: SurrenderMonkey wrote: Did you have an argument to make, or have you just been reduced to shrilly complaining about THE SYSTEM for no articulable reason at this...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.19 19:48:09
|
1400. "That" time of year again. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: SurrenderMonkey wrote: Did you have an argument to make, or have you just been reduced to shrilly complaining about THE SYSTEM for no articulable reason at this point? Have you actually done anything or presented ...
- by SurrenderMonkey - at 2016.01.19 19:40:43
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 [70] 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |