Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 |
381. CCP: Slot, Turret and Launcher Rigs - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
It would be a nighmare to balance anything if these rigs were an actual thing.
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.06 11:30:00
|
382. The Venture II - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
DrysonBennington wrote: To bring miners into low sector and null on solo endeavors I suggest that a Tech II variant of the Venture be built by CCP. It would have the same attributes as the Venture except for the following areas: Traits Minin...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.06 09:09:00
|
383. Certificate Bonuses - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
That's just daft. Being given your degree certificate doesn't make you better at your degree subject, it just means you can show people you really do have that level of ability in that subject. This is precisely what the current certificate syste...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.05 13:41:00
|
384. High-Sec Cancer - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This is an amazing thread. I can't figure out whether it's a genuine grievance thread or a cunning publicity stunt by James 315 and crew. Whilst I consider high sec miner hassling to be a bit on the lowdown side I do have to doff my cap at him if...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.05 10:00:00
|
385. The Fight For New Jita - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Luc Chastot wrote: I don't think this is the right forum to role play. Correct. Whilst Dryson's anti-Jita rant is quite amusing it should really be elsewhere. Probably the role-playing forum.
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.05 08:32:00
|
386. Damage Meter - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Shereza wrote: Tchulen wrote: The most amusing thing about reading this thread is knowing, with certainty, that this won't be added to the game. For all your arguing for a damage meter in EVE, OP, you neither have the backing of the communi...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.04 19:04:00
|
387. Hidden Belt Warning Dialogue Boxes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Anyone who's actually done any mining knows that this proposed change is pointless because you know very quickly by simply looking in the site once you land roughly how much of the site is gone considering you know what type of site it is because ...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.03 20:04:00
|
388. Attributes, Remaps and Skill Points per hour: Why must optimization hurt newer p... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Anna Verhyldvar wrote: Tchulen wrote: If people took responsibility for their actions and applied a little more thought, research and care to what they do these sorts of requests wouldn't appear. Did you even bother reading my post? My pro...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.03 09:37:00
|
389. Damage Meter - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The most amusing thing about reading this thread is knowing, with certainty, that this won't be added to the game. For all your arguing for a damage meter in EVE, OP, you neither have the backing of the community or of CCP and so yeah, never gunn...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.03 09:26:00
|
390. My turn to create an AFK cloaky thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rayzilla Zaraki wrote: MGood ideas but even in this game too many players rely solely on gear to do what thinking should be able to do. Oh so very true. Even when the thinking is done for them too many players refuse to listen to it and pref...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.02 15:13:00
|
391. My turn to create an AFK cloaky thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nikk Narrel wrote: The main obstacle, is the perception that local is needed for PvE defense. This is disingenuous, as local benefits most those with no group support. Certainly, PvE pilots can use it, but they should already have intel channel...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.02 15:11:00
|
392. My turn to create an AFK cloaky thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Maximus Aerelius wrote: I see what you've done there...but they'd just whine about the "fix" CCP gave them and say that your idea and cloaking is broken and that equals double whine-posts which makes me cry a little inside g Erm.... Yeah, I...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.02 14:27:00
|
393. My turn to create an AFK cloaky thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nikk Narrel wrote: ...snipped... I entirely agree with you, Nik. The best solution would be the removal of local and more intel gathering tools instead. Even removing just local and leaving constellation chat would be a darned good start. ...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.02 14:22:00
|
394. My turn to create an AFK cloaky thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Uh-huh. I agree with you that in an ideal world people should use one of the many solutions that have been presented to them over and over again by people like you and me. However, this isn't an idea world and there are people too dumb or stubbor...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.02 14:03:00
|
395. My turn to create an AFK cloaky thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
There is obviously a problem for some people regarding having cloaked ships in their system. Whether you agree that it's a problem or not, no one can debate the frequency that this rubbish gets posted on the F&Y forums. I would like to propose...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.02 13:35:00
|
396. Attributes, Remaps and Skill Points per hour: Why must optimization hurt newer p... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No thanks. I like the attributes system. I like the fact people have a reason to stick varied implants in their heads that appear on killboards. I like the fact that you have to decide at least partially whether you're going to chose to maximise ...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.01 14:07:00
|
397. Damage Meter - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cpt Tirel wrote: Damage and damage application is quite complicated in EVE. A damage meter would show details a killmail never could. In addition a killmail is something that must be looked up and therefore often gets ignored or overlooked, whi...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.08.01 09:11:00
|
398. Damage Meter - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This is possibly the most pointless change request I've read in a while. As expressed by Kalanaja, the dps output of an individual pilot is pretty much immaterial in an engagement in pvp due to all the reasons she's already explained. Killmails g...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.07.31 11:00:00
|
399. Raise the Black Flag... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nikk Narrel wrote: Now, you are pointing out good and valid details, but I must question whether you have considered the balancing points. You cannot anonymously take space. You don't get kills, which means you also don't get credit. You can ...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.07.31 07:38:00
|
400. Raise the Black Flag... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
And yet, with all the secure havens there are, fights of all sizes still happen and the underdogs still win some. I understand what you mean regarding allowing small groups to attack larger groups without fear of reprisals but I simply don't agre...
- by Tchulen - at 2013.07.30 15:16:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |