Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 |
381. New Dev Blog: Retrospective: How was the CSM Summit in Iceland? - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Razin It took CSM a weekend to understand that this is needed? Erm no. The idea was pitched during one of the 50 minute session on the first day. The idea wasn't agreed on at that time and we discussed other things the...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.07 20:10:00
|
382. New Dev Blog: Retrospective: How was the CSM Summit in Iceland? - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
This thread is relevant to my interests
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.06 23:40:00
|
383. DEV BLOG SNIPAH: Alliance Tournament 8! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Chainsaw Plankton so if we don't need a way to limit the teams why not just let everyone, that wants in, in if the only reason it went over was your "alt alliances" and no shows? 74 teams were selected from the 100 that a...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.06 23:22:00
|
384. Tournament Rule - Flagship Fittings - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: ShoreTay Hai, meet my friend Heavy Energy Neutralizer II Because nobody would support their flagship with logistics and cap transfer spiders Yeah yeah, bring jammers to break the spiders. See how much more interestin...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.06 17:36:00
|
385. DEV BLOG SNIPAH: Alliance Tournament 8! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Katarlia Simov Edited by: Katarlia Simov on 06/03/2010 14:57:23 Originally by: TeaDaze If you look at the numbers from AT7 it is more like a 50% chance of getting in on the random draw. Thats kinda of the p...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.06 17:29:00
|
386. DEV BLOG SNIPAH: Alliance Tournament 8! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Kirianna Schmitt Quote from the AT8 rules: "3. Teams may field no more than 2 of a given ship. This applies to specifically named ships only, and not ship hulls. For example, 2 Curses, 2 Pilgrims, and 2 Arbitrators would be ...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.06 11:17:00
|
387. Ewar - Specifically ECM - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lord's Prophet No. I plan on having a widow as flagship with a full rack of officer ECM. FU Amusing as this would be Quote: Flagships 1. Any standard T1 or Faction battleship hull may be designated as a flagship. ...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.06 10:49:00
|
388. Flagships - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lord's Prophet So, a flagship is a normal boat with high-end guns/repper/ewar? Yes, if this isn't useful in your team then just submit any old setup as your flagship and never field it. Originally by: Lord's Prop...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.06 10:41:00
|
389. Flagships - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Trabber Shir Based on the singular term "your flagship" used in both the rules and the blog, I think it is pretty clear that you only get 1. I believe this is the point. One named flagship with setup published in advanc...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.06 10:23:00
|
390. Tournament Rule - Flagship Fittings - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nyphur I'm also interested in why Tech 2 battleships weren't listed as being able to be flagships. Was this an oversight or is there a reason they can't be used? Hmm, faction reps with a marauder's rep bonus and T2 resist...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.06 10:16:00
|
391. DEV BLOG SNIPAH: Alliance Tournament 8! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Valea Silpha Let joy be unconfined. The rich once again get to dominate the tournament. How many times have we seen a rich Alliance lose to a bunch of "nobodies". It happens fairly regularly. Originally by: Valea...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.06 10:09:00
|
392. DEV BLOG SNIPAH: Alliance Tournament 8! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Chainsaw Plankton and never understood the "5. Unused points will be added to the opponents score." rule This one is pretty simple when you think about it. A team scores based on the value of opponent ships killed (plus...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.06 02:59:00
|
393. DEV BLOG SNIPAH: Alliance Tournament 8! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Chainsaw Plankton auction your way in.... I just threw up a bit Would you rather more people rolled Alt Alliances just to get in via the random draw like last time?
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.06 01:04:00
|
394. Tournament Rule (corp/alliance membership) - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sa'haira don't have an issue with the rule, but when is the alliance tournament so i know when this 60 days starts from? From the Tourney format page Quote: Competition Dates * Qualifying Round 1 û June 5th & 6...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.05 23:38:00
|
395. OMG - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
I predict it will be even better than last time
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.05 22:50:00
|
396. DEV BLOG SNIPAH: Alliance Tournament 8! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: ElvenLord Originally by: CCP Claw The CSM brought this idea up also without it being mentioned, and since we were both on the same page it became a final decision. I'm glad we where on the same page and for you g...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.05 22:45:00
|
397. Meeting minutes from Iceland summit are up - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Venkul Mul Wonderful example, everyone want to firm a treaty saying "we will get isk from you for using system X, but we will camp every adjacent system and blow you up when you try to enter it". Maybe you should think a bi...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.04 21:45:00
|
398. Meeting minutes from Iceland summit are up - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Marlona Sky You guys keep dodging the question of how this is supposed to allow smaller alliances the ability to access 0.0 without being all buddy buddy with power blocks. If you are going to not bother to actually read ...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.04 20:37:00
|
399. Meeting minutes from Iceland summit are up - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Aynen Don't you think that the alliances would see such blue status renting corporations as being competition to the available resources in 'their' 0.0 systems, and that the big alliances would prefer to reap the resources t...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.04 19:22:00
|
400. Meeting minutes from Iceland summit are up - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: mistersparky Interesting stuff with regards to overviews in station, and docking while scrammed. Wouldn't it be fair to say that the issues of neutral reppers, docking and jumping mechanics is a greater issue than general do...
- by TeaDaze - at 2010.03.04 15:39:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |