Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
121. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Zappity wrote: I simply do not agree with your opinions on this topic. The fundamental difference between an offline POS and an inactive ship is that the ship is in a station. We are repeatedly told that when you undock you consent to PvP and b...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.16 09:54:00
|
122. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Aeonidis wrote: He said nothing about T2 manufacturing he said new T2 Inventors GǪexcept that the quoted post was talking about new manufacturers, not just inventors. As it happens, new players will still have an easy time no matter which...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.16 09:52:00
|
123. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Antihrist Pripravnik wrote: That's a plan? Having a handful of players that have items from a discontinued mechanics dating back more than 5 years ago controll the market of T2 BPCs is an actual plan? Wow. Mass printing of T2 BPCs will not "m...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.16 09:12:00
|
124. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Zappity wrote: Why can't offline = abandoned? Because there's little to no correlation between the two. Abandonment isn't just a state GÇö it's an intent , or perhaps more accurately a lack thereof. An offline POS is about as abandoned as a ...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.16 08:37:00
|
125. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Zappity wrote: Because it clearly isn't sufficient right now. Have you ever gone out and looked at the number of offline POS in highsec? Yes, with some frequency as I go out and scout potential new locations. It's actually quite easy to find a...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.16 08:15:00
|
126. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sizeof Void wrote: Unless you happen to be among the newer players, who have been grinding standings more recently to put up their first POS. But, I guess those players are the "lower class" of EVE... lol. Then you still have a couple of mon...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.16 02:31:00
|
127. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
GreasyCarl Semah wrote: I am amazed that CCP would want to change the way POSes are used to research and produce while at the same time changing the way slots work in NPC stations. Wouldn't one change at a time be a little more prudent? Why not...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.16 02:27:00
|
128. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Zifrian wrote: You are implicitly arguing for it though. Yes, by saying that these are great changes, I'm implicitly arguing for the status quo. Project more. If you don't care that your arguments are easily dismissed as fallacies, then tha...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.16 01:43:00
|
129. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jake Centauri wrote: So you are flushing the tremendous effort to grind standings to anchor POSes in hisec down the toilet. How will you compensate people for this? Not at all. It was effort that paid for itself many times over a long time ag...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.16 01:12:00
|
130. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sabriz Adoudel wrote: If a tower has been out of fuel for a full week, it's 'properly abandoned'. Not really, no. Just because it's been a week doesn't mean no-one will come and defend it if you try to get rid of it. And as mentioned, what you...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.16 01:11:00
|
131. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sylvanium Orlenard wrote: 3. You mentioned in the Dev Blog that copy times will be decreased in order to make it a viable option to rectify point number 2. Which is all nice however, T2 components BPOs require items (reports I believe) in order...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.16 00:47:00
|
132. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Zifrian wrote: Yes, I think it is too long. There are tons of systems with towers just sitting there for no other reason than to hold the spot. Is that really intended? Sure, why not? They got there first and can now leverage their speed. If y...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.16 00:40:00
|
133. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Greygal wrote: Why use a multiplication factor of 100 on the R.A.M.'s etc? Why not just use a factor of 10? Using your example, instead of the invul now requiring 60, it would require 6. Most likely because they're currently percentage-base...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.16 00:09:00
|
134. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Querns wrote: Tippia wrote: How does this in any way GÇ£endGÇ¥ highsec? He has been subjected to the worst of all perils: a minor inconvenience. Tbh, I'm not even sure it's going be to be an inconvenience. A lot of it just makes manufact...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.15 23:54:00
|
135. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ginger Barbarella wrote: Guess it's time to sell my towers, labs, and blueprints. Nothin' left now but wasting isk in low sec. Kudos, CCP. One more step to ending high sec. I still say you guys should just man-up and eliminate high sec, but ea...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.15 23:52:00
|
136. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
gifter Penken wrote: But they ARE connected. Not the outputs, no. The results of the two outputs on the market is, but that's not what I'm talking about. And with the tiny effect the BPOs will have on the supply, the chances of it coming back ...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.15 23:02:00
|
137. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kadl wrote: I never claimed that T2 BPO production capabilities would effect inventor production capabilities , only their profits, prices, and market volume. You said that higher BPO output somehow yields lower invention output, and you said...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.15 22:48:00
|
138. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Zifrian wrote: Tippia wrote: Why isn't the wardec solution sufficient? It takes too long. 25 hours is GÇ£too longGÇ¥? Yeah, no. You're going to have to come up with something far better than that. What you're saying here is that the sol...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.15 22:24:00
|
139. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
gifter Penken wrote: The real point was an attempt to counter Tippa's comment that invention supplied quantity and T2 BPO supplied quantity are unrelated. That is not true. Total demand will be filled by the sum of T2 BPO produced and invention...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.15 22:08:00
|
140. Sticky:Dev blog: Building better Worlds - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Querns wrote: It gives the pos haver warning and lets them online the tower. So? Then it is obviously an actively occupied moon. Ranger1 wrote: i think the wardec solution works great vs an active corp.. however vs abandoned POS's that are...
- by Tippia - at 2014.04.15 21:58:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |