Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 [700] 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 |
13981. CCP - Just remove low sec and highsec!- this whole topic is becoming tedious - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
evereplicant wrote: 3 years with all the changes, expansions its stayed stagnant.... the facts are there, open your eyes GǪand see that the number of subscribers has grown. Oh, and just to answer that other dribbleGǪ evereplicant wrote: ...
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 15:41:00
|
13982. Stop saying eve is growing - its not... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GǪexcept that EVE is growing.
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 15:39:00
|
13983. CCP needs to ban -5 or lower players from hi-sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Velicitia wrote: Wait, how'd my argument of "shoot the -5 pilot" turn into "Vel is a newb-ganking n00b"? Because you suggested that someone shoot something, and that level of unrepentant savagery obviously indicates that you do nothing but fea...
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 12:00:00
|
13984. CCP - Just remove low sec and highsec!- this whole topic is becoming tedious - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
evereplicant wrote: The boundaries seems to be getting more and more blurred. You are allowing any one and everyone to go anywhere and everywhere and do whatever they like without consequence. GǪbecause it's up to the players to provide said ...
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 11:58:00
|
13985. CCP needs to ban -5 or lower players from hi-sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
evereplicant wrote: Oh dear another noob, yes but the people you are ganking are usually NOOBS and NOT fitted for pvp! Irrelevant. Those -5s are still free for all to shoot, and it's still up to the players to GÇ£banGÇ£ them from highsec GÇö w...
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 11:52:00
|
13986. CCP needs to ban -5 or lower players from hi-sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
evereplicant wrote: Tippia I have yet to see you agree with anything that anyone posts, its becoming tedious. You haven't been paying attention then. Maybe if the OP had provided even the slightest bit of reason or argument, he would have stoo...
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 11:47:00
|
13987. Hi-sec ganking IS griefing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Klandi wrote: NO lexmana - other players CREATED the situation in the sandbox and I am dealing with it - just let me get on with it without ganking me!! It rather sounds like you're not dealing with it. Why shouldn't they gank you?
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 11:42:00
|
13988. CCP needs to ban -5 or lower players from hi-sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No, they really don't.
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 11:25:00
|
13989. Sony Supports Hulkageddon and Mittani's Blog - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mina Hiragi wrote: ITT: People confuse Smedley with Sony. With reason .
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 02:19:00
|
13990. LoL, somebody learnt a new word today - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Spy 21 wrote: Maybe forever but a month ago nobody was using it. RightGǪ
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 02:06:00
|
13991. Dust has Walking in stations.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
EVE Roy Mustang wrote: So then shouldnt the NDA redacted stuff be unredacted? Yes. Quote: As its not, still doesnt look like they agree Doesn't particularly matter. The poor ISD is just plain wrong anyway. The NDA covers stuff that happe...
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 01:03:00
|
13992. Does the 'PvPers are Sociopaths' argument bother anyone else? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sisohiv wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy Mittens was banned for 30 days for just that. GÇ£psychopathy refers not only to specific behavioral patterns but measurable cognitive, emotional, and neuropsychological differences.GÇ¥...
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 00:45:00
|
13993. R-E-S-P-E-C-T - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Grumpymunky wrote: How does one monkey texts by the way? I must know! Two words: banana ink.
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 00:41:00
|
13994. Hi-sec ganking IS griefing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Klandi wrote: What conclusion did I arrive at - I was only aware of asking questions GǣHi-sec ganking IS griefingGǥ GǪyou know, the title of your OP? An OP punctuated by GǣThat is griefing...Gǥ
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 00:24:00
|
13995. Hi-sec ganking IS griefing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Klandi wrote: I only gave the POS example as a factual scenario and expected you to look at the entire picture. I then applied an unpleasant interaction (ganking) and asked, within the state of the environment we created, why are you doing this...
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 00:15:00
|
13996. Dust has Walking in stations.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
EVE Roy Mustang wrote: I think they disagree Hence the removed posts I think that neither the person reporting the post, nor the ISD, has read the Dust EULA or seen Dust in person (to say nothing of the public source of the OP's information)....
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 00:14:00
|
13997. Dust has Walking in stations.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
EVE Roy Mustang wrote: BUSTED Nice... NDA violation... great way to lose yer account lol Too bad nothing of what he said was covered by the NDA.
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.07 00:06:00
|
13998. Does the 'PvPers are Sociopaths' argument bother anyone else? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Velicitia wrote: Actually Tippia, I think he's talking about the tank in Halada's guide. It's not that bad ... BUT it's only good in the place it was designed to be used, and for the purpose it was designed for (i.e. tanking nullsec rat DPS). ...
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.06 22:57:00
|
13999. Does the 'PvPers are Sociopaths' argument bother anyone else? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Horus Ernaga wrote: The real question is why are these players specifically targeting those that do with wish to be targeted. Because they're valid targets and because wishing not to be targeted isn't reason enough not to target them GÇö they ...
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.06 22:35:00
|
14000. R-E-S-P-E-C-T - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gonada wrote: Your just reiterating what I said, I agree, totally What you said and what I said differs on a few critical points. You might have meant the same, but it didn't quite come out that way. Also, the OP isn't quite telling it like...
- by Tippia - at 2012.06.06 22:22:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 [700] 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |