Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 |
101. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: Do you even undock? Do you even have an argument? Rhetoric question GÇö you don't. That's why you have to rely on this constant use of fallacies. Quote: People have been complaining about DCU's being active modules since day 1...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 03:51:36
|
102. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: You've got a point there on the actived DCU thing. But I'm going to err on the side of "I'm really, REALLY sick of having to click it every single goddamn time I jump/bridge" That's not so much erring as just making **** up wholes...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 03:33:51
|
103. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: The primary beneficiary of the change are your general combat ships. No. The primary beneficiary from this are ships that couldn't or often wouldn't fit DCUs and that have huge amounts of hull HP. For everyone else, it's pretty ...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 03:18:40
|
104. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: I don't have to lie So why are you doing it then? Quote: this entire thread has been 90% gankers whining about having to undock a few more Talos. Demonstrably false. Quote: The people really suffering are those trying to ...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 03:08:04
|
105. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: Highsec is getting a little less risky for freighter pilots, a little more risky for gankers. No. Highsec is getting a lot less risky for freigther pilots (and it's already close to zero risk), and a fair bit more risky for gank...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 02:48:05
|
106. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: I understand risk fine.. No. If you did, you'd very easily spot the huge risks for the ganker(s) compared to the utterly minute risks for the freighter pilot, rather than incorrectly think the opposite is true based on ship ...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 02:27:51
|
107. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: Because if it dies the pilot is out 5b after insurance. If somebody is risking 5b in highsec, I expect their attackers to match that risk before they can reap any rewards. GǪbut again, that just demonstrates a fundamental misunde...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 02:20:04
|
108. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: So you won't do anything without a 1:7 edge? What GÇ£edgeGÇ¥? We're talking about ship costs here. You seem to be very confused about what that concept means. And could you answer the question? What's ridiculous about the ISK r...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 02:10:09
|
109. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: Its ridiculous because of the isk ratio. I'd trade 1b to kill 7b in a heartbeat. What's ridiculous about it? And you should be able to make that trade (well, actually, you'd have to make it 1:9 or so before it makes any sense)...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 02:04:35
|
110. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: If you have a problem with concord, come to nullsec! So you agree, then that ISK tanking is a profoundly stupid idea, seeing as how you can't think of any argument to support it. Good, that's settled then.
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 01:51:42
|
111. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: Why the time limit? Because we're talking about highsec ganking, numbnuts. Quote: If you spend 1b, and the target spends 7b, that's ALL the risk on their end. No. So we can conclude that, not only do you not understand what h...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 01:42:01
|
112. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: You can't do more than 10dps in a rifter? You have 20 seconds to chew through 32k EHP. Kindly show the Rifter fit that is capable of doing so. I can tell you right now, 10 DPS will not cut it.
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 01:30:35
|
113. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: As I said, a rifter can easily take a JF or any larger expensive ship if it has the time. GǪexcept that, as mentioned, it can't.
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 01:26:17
|
114. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: That's ********. Welcome to the fundamental flaw of ISK tanking as a concept. Quote: The entire point of CONCORD is to make killing random ships in highsec risk]. No. The point of CONCORD in its various forms is that it ensur...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 01:21:14
|
115. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: A rifter can solo a JF given enough time. GǪin the parts of space where ISK tanking has been properly shot in the face. But since we're talking about ganking in highsec, and about the mindblowingly idiotic notion that the cost...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 01:01:30
|
116. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Alexis Nightwish wrote: Lowest priced Anshar on EVE-Central is 7.5B (in Derelik) and a bit more in Jita. At least at the moment of this post. Nomad is 6.85 in jita Not that it matters; the underlying argument is hideous...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 00:50:06
|
117. [:!:]Warning - Skill injector Bug - Warning[:!:] - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kaivar Lancer wrote: Um, who cares? If it brings more newbies up to par with vets in order to PVP , I'm all for it. (and I say that as a PVPer and lowsec dweller). It doesn't. Not a single newbie will be made on par with vets in PvP through t...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 00:42:07
|
118. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Morrigan LeSante wrote: Any chance the ganking sperging can go back to GD where it belongs so we can actually talk about the mods and the eviscerating of the fits as a result? Why shouldn't the results of an ill-conceived changed be discussed...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 00:28:11
|
119. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
bigbud skunkafella wrote: to coin a phrase, color me surprised I colour you incomprehensible instead, since your comment made no sense in relation to what you quoted. No. I did not mean whatever you said; I meant what I said. If you don't ...
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 00:21:21
|
120. Sticky:[March] Damage Control Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
bigbud skunkafella wrote: you mean like warr akini suggested a wreck hp increase , thus nerfing ag effective counter against hisec freighter ganking perhaps? No.
- by Tippia - at 2016.02.12 00:16:26
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |