Pages: [1] |
1. Adhocracy statement on new POSes - in Wormholes [original thread]
TheGunslinger42 wrote: As for limiting pos size/mods in smaller class wormholes: It's just a stupid, stupid idea. I agree. Such arbitrary measures are almost always bad. Instead of trying to restrict C-1 to C-3 fortification itself, much b...
- by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.21 09:10:00
|
2. Adhocracy statement on new POSes - in Wormholes [original thread]
Improving life in WH is a two-edged sword. Yes it will make life in WH easier, but at the same time, these days it's mostly the inconvenience of living in a WH what keeps it 'hardcore'. For instance better corp hangar management will result in le...
- by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.21 09:04:00
|
3. If the following changes were made to WH Mass Mechanics, would WH's be ruine... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Derath Ellecon wrote: None of that seems like it would make things any "better". Just more annoying and tedious. Leaving the door open for example in your post sounds cool. But since that open door is critical, a potentially invading fleet wou...
- by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.20 15:03:00
|
4. The sad state of WH PvP - in Wormholes [original thread]
Jack Miton wrote: Finally, everyone now knows how effective dreads are against subcaps so even the large players almost never engage each other in the enemy's home system due to blap dreads. Big ships being effective against smaller ships i...
- by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.16 09:46:00
|
5. WH Thiefs/Griefers - in Wormholes [original thread]
Risk of corp-theft keeps the more 'casual' corporations out of W-space. Not necessarily a bad thing.
- by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.15 13:52:00
|
6. Wormhole POS Security - Lessons learned - in Wormholes [original thread]
People DO realize, I hope, that reducing the chance of corp-theft just makes WH a lot less 'hardcore'. Horrendous corp asset management certainly is one of the factors keeping a lot of WH-corps small and focused.
- by Tobiaz - at 2012.05.29 21:43:00
|
7. 3 weeks in a C5...no grav sites. - in Wormholes [original thread]
Killer Claw wrote: Wormholes essentially have a shelf-life, yours just could be all farmed out. That's basically how CCP explained it. But the exact workings of the site respawn mechanics tell a different tale.
- by Tobiaz - at 2012.05.29 21:11:00
|
8. so... more wormhole systems? - in Wormholes [original thread]
Practiced scanners could do the dragging of the probes before the 'alt' update much faster then untrained scanners. Just because someone thinks stuff is too tedious doesn't automatically make it better for the game to 'fix' that. Convenience can b...
- by Tobiaz - at 2012.05.11 21:16:00
|
9. so... more wormhole systems? - in Wormholes [original thread]
Terrorfrodo wrote: Sleepers killing POSes is a ridiculous idea. EVE is not a game where you fight your wars against npcs. Killing a POS is the players' job. And scanning did not get easier with recent changes, it's exactly the same as before...
- by Tobiaz - at 2012.05.11 14:15:00
|
10. so... more wormhole systems? - in Wormholes [original thread]
Nathan Jameson wrote: Coolsmoke wrote: Why on earth would I go to a C4? I think some delicate balancing needs doing there, to improve the rate of migration. I agree. Having lived in a C4 for two years before my current system, C4s need a ...
- by Tobiaz - at 2012.05.11 14:06:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |