| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
41. Dear Tuxford, Re: T2 Ammo Changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 24/10/2006 12:29:15 Originally by: LUKEC Yes, you will get armor hp penalty on hail. If they remove the speed penalty, I could live with it. But you are most likely k...
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.24 13:16:00
|
42. The ECM Blog Thread - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Blind Man Originally by: Shin Ra I have officially lost faith in Tuxford. Bring back TomB. agreed TomB never went anywhere. He's the lead game designer and every single change I make is sanctioned by him...
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.23 15:44:00
|
43. Hitpoint boost and artilleries - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Testy Mctest I'm not 100% sure what your graphs are showing/against, but from ours, the numbers we came out with were that artillery needed roughly a 7% boost for us to be happy. Given that your graphs are probably more accu...
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.23 12:20:00
|
44. Hitpoint boost and artilleries - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk Edited by: Tyrrax Thorrk on 23/10/2006 12:06:41 "Artilleries have the advantage of not using cap but imo that is not really that great advantage but an advantage nonetheless." Not that great an advanta...
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.23 12:19:00
|
45. Hitpoint boost and artilleries - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Lets start this by taking a look at this image . There are number of things that are odd about it. Turrets have bonuses applied, like range and damage for 425mm, rate of fire for artilliers and nothing for Amarr I'm comparing these guns by us...
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.23 11:57:00
|
46. Dear Tuxford, Re: ECM Blog - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Old Geeza Originally by: Tuxford ZOMG BLOG LOST!!!! We've found it though. Think Kieron is just about to post it. \o/ <3 * shakes fist angrily at Kieron Not Kieron's fault _______________
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.23 10:50:00
|
47. Dear Tuxford, Re: ECM Blog - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
ZOMG BLOG LOST!!!! We've found it though. Think Kieron is just about to post it. _______________
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.23 10:31:00
|
48. A bit more changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: DeadDuck Looks great, especially the wcs nerf and I would be excited to hear about the ecm changes. No news regarding the Nosferatus... Are they gonna contnue with the same stats ? Thanks No changes to nosferatu in Kal...
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.19 11:51:00
|
49. A bit more changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Kamikaaazi tux, is hull allso going to te increased by 50%? I really hope its just shield and armor. All hitpoints, including hull _______________
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.19 11:51:00
|
50. A bit more changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Narusegawa Naru What exactly does that mean for shields? Better or worse? More shields, same peak recharge rate. _______________
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.19 11:34:00
|
51. A bit more changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Donmadefy Originally by: Tuxford You do realize that I meant recharge time by 50%. That means that the peak rate does not change at all. Ah. Your first post said recharge rate, and above you said recharge time. ...
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.19 10:52:00
|
52. A bit more changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Deva Blackfire Originally by: Tuxford Like I said in the Khanid MK2 thread I've gotten some very postive feedback on the change but its not gonna happen in Kali 1. Havent checked it for quite a while OMG OMG O...
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.19 10:48:00
|
53. A bit more changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Deva Blackfire Edited by: Deva Blackfire on 19/10/2006 10:41:01 Still disappointed by lack of Khanid changes, but OMG WCS NERF - me love :) Like I said in the Khanid MK2 thread I've gotten some very postive feedback o...
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.19 10:45:00
|
54. A bit more changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Donmadefy > I didn't really check it but I'll probably increase shield recharge > rate by about 50% as well just to be on the safe side On all ships? Pottsey's gonna love you :) You do realize that I meant recharg...
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.19 10:44:00
|
55. A bit more changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Gwennec Edited by: Gwennec on 19/10/2006 10:30:55 Quote: Ship hitpoint increase, about 50% for tech 1 and about 25% on tech 2. A bit more on battlecruises/command ships and destroyers/interdictors Does that aff...
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.19 10:43:00
|
56. A bit more changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I've been replying to the forums today. I'm just gonna list some of the smaller tweaks and changes here. Ships Powergrid of Sacrilege, Deimos and Muninn increased to 1100MW, 950MW and 1100MW respectively CPU of Sacrilege and Deimos increased...
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.19 10:19:00
|
57. Some Minor changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Idara Edited by: Idara on 11/10/2006 17:43:53 Originally by: Tuxford To be totally clear then its the target navigation prediction bonus, that is the one that reduces explosion velocity of the missile that is bei...
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.11 17:46:00
|
58. Deimos: The Ugly Duckling - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Dragy Originally by: Tuxford anything hehe to be exact : Are you fixing deimos ? if yes, what is going to be boosted ? grid and cpu _______________
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.11 17:34:00
|
59. Deimos: The Ugly Duckling - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
anything _______________
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.11 17:28:00
|
60. Some Minor changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
To be totally clear then its the target navigation prediction bonus, that is the one that reduces explosion velocity of the missile that is being replaced by launcher rate of fire bonus on the nighthawk. _______________
- by Tuxford - at 2006.10.11 17:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |