| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
1. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
+1 to CCP for finally making all the useless frigates/cruisers and feroxes something applicable to the damned game. I (and many others) have been stating this for years in the F&I section.
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2012.03.07 00:16:00
|
2. Sticky:New dev blog: Backwards Then Forwards - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote: Tyme Xandr wrote: Tarryn Nightstorm wrote: Tyme Xandr wrote: [...] ...the exploration boat in the Echelon, the wormholes where u have safer nullsec ores and sleepers to kill and harvest for production. [.....
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2012.02.25 02:20:00
|
3. Sticky:New dev blog: Backwards Then Forwards - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Reyona wrote: Is Inferno the best name for the expansion? It doesn't fit the "war" theme all that well. Maybe it fits the theme of the forum being set ablaze by whiny complainy people who were mad over a insider newsletter that displayed two...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2012.02.23 02:15:00
|
4. Sticky:New dev blog: Backwards Then Forwards - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote: Tyme Xandr wrote: [...] ...the exploration boat in the Echelon, the wormholes where u have safer nullsec ores and sleepers to kill and harvest for production. [...] Wait, what??! [facepalm] Not sure if ...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2012.02.23 01:09:00
|
5. Sticky:New dev blog: Backwards Then Forwards - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alx Warlord wrote: Chiggy W wrote: Alx Warlord wrote: Guys, keep in mind that there are paths in eve that you may chose, the Military is just one of them, and most of the players that join eve don't goes to PVP area and end up stopping ...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2012.02.22 19:21:00
|
6. Sticky:New dev blog: Backwards Then Forwards - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Vrykolakasis wrote: Jowen Datloran wrote: words Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote: words. I understand the importance of industry, and I too would like to see some improvements in that area. What I don't understand is playing a space game w...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2012.02.22 18:41:00
|
7. Sticky:New dev blog: Backwards Then Forwards - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
All the threads concerning changing mining to a more active style of mining have always been swarmed by the mining masses who mine while watching TV and movies or whatever. CCP wont ever change mining as it would result in another ***** fest in ji...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2012.02.22 18:36:00
|
8. Sticky:New dev blog: Backwards Then Forwards - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote: So... CCP, Do you (will you ever) give a squat about not pew-pew players in EVE??? Industry and mining is on life support and you don't give a squat about players that like that part of game. How much more indy ppl nee...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2012.02.22 18:20:00
|
9. Sticky:New dev blog: Backwards Then Forwards - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I know I am the minority on this, and I hate to complain, but as much as a 'concentration in Space stuffs' is great for EVE Online (a spaceship oriented game) I was one of the (I suppose few?) players who were really excited for the WIS stuff. I f...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2012.02.22 18:11:00
|
10. MAKE TIER 2 T2 BATTLECRUISERS, pleas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jon Marburg wrote: If CCP is going to make more Tech 2 battlecruisers, they are going to need to fill a different role than the current ones that already exist. There is no reason just to add more ships just to have more ships. Find a new purpo...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.08 16:35:00
|
11. MAKE TIER 2 T2 BATTLECRUISERS, pleas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Fon Revedhort wrote: No anger, just sympathy for the ungifted ones. These pathetic threads pop up on a monthly basis. Gooooooooood. [ clasps hands together ]
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.07 17:14:00
|
12. PvP agents: PvP on demand for casuals and carebears - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote: I disagree, it's not convoluted; rather it's reasonably abuse-proof. Probably people would figure ways to abuse the mechanic, but the most blatant ones (jumping in, bringing in friends, building an uber-pwner, don't...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.06 00:12:00
|
13. PvP agents: PvP on demand for casuals and carebears - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nestara Aldent wrote: Ganking is part of PvP in this game. really, if you don't like it, and you want strictly consensual PvP, you'll be better served playing some other MMO. That's New Eden with pirates, player run corporations with greedy ...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.05 22:58:00
|
14. [Incarna] Don't abandon it! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ghost of Truth wrote: Just give us one simple emty room for us to meet for now.Or else CQ will stay forever there as a memorial of the disgrace that CCp and Eve suffered.I can already see a new guy asking; -Whats the use of the CQ?I cant do AN...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.05 05:54:00
|
15. PvP agents: PvP on demand for casuals and carebears - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nestara Aldent wrote: @Tyme You like CTF? Great! However, CTF and battlegrounds aren't for this game, so you'll have to play to that other game. And I'll now add, battlegrounds were invented because that other MMO couldn't handle large open...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.05 05:52:00
|
16. MAKE TIER 2 T2 BATTLECRUISERS, pleas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Fon Revedhort wrote: So much stupidity in this thread... I can't help smiling. Your fugly drake was introduced at least a year later after NH and the same for the rest. So GFY. And no, you can't get you already overpowered ships in tech2 hull...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.05 05:51:00
|
17. MAKE TIER 2 T2 BATTLECRUISERS, pleas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Markus Reese wrote: Tyme Xandr wrote: Markus Reese wrote: Playing the TL:DR card, so if it was said already, meh. Anyways, the T2 tier 2s essentially already exist, just with the T1 skins. Nighthawk is pretty much a drake. Sliep->Cane...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.05 00:08:00
|
18. [Incarna] Don't abandon it! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nestara Aldent wrote: Those who seek primarily to show their character and socialize have games tailored for them. EVE's universe goes way beyond a ship in space. Many of the great stories of EVE center around a character and his relationsh...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.04 20:44:00
|
19. [Incarna] Don't abandon it! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
They have been put on the backburner for now. Once CCP satiates the idiots of New Eden with some new ships and 'stuffz' they will continue working on Incarna, although probably at a slower pace. I expect they wont bring it out in rolling expansio...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.04 16:34:00
|
20. Tech 2 Battleships... a 3rd? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Maybe make them marauders and offer the races other weapon set bonuses. For instance: Caldari - Hybrid bonus. Gallente - Large drone bay with drone bonuses. Amarr - Missile bonuses (like the damnation, etc). Minmatar - Uhm ... missile ... bonuses...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.04 15:53:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |