| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
1. MAKE TIER 2 T2 BATTLECRUISERS, pleas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jon Marburg wrote: If CCP is going to make more Tech 2 battlecruisers, they are going to need to fill a different role than the current ones that already exist. There is no reason just to add more ships just to have more ships. Find a new purpo...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.08 16:35:00
|
2. MAKE TIER 2 T2 BATTLECRUISERS, pleas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Fon Revedhort wrote: No anger, just sympathy for the ungifted ones. These pathetic threads pop up on a monthly basis. Gooooooooood. [ clasps hands together ]
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.07 17:14:00
|
3. PvP agents: PvP on demand for casuals and carebears - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote: I disagree, it's not convoluted; rather it's reasonably abuse-proof. Probably people would figure ways to abuse the mechanic, but the most blatant ones (jumping in, bringing in friends, building an uber-pwner, don't...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.06 00:12:00
|
4. PvP agents: PvP on demand for casuals and carebears - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nestara Aldent wrote: Ganking is part of PvP in this game. really, if you don't like it, and you want strictly consensual PvP, you'll be better served playing some other MMO. That's New Eden with pirates, player run corporations with greedy ...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.05 22:58:00
|
5. [Incarna] Don't abandon it! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ghost of Truth wrote: Just give us one simple emty room for us to meet for now.Or else CQ will stay forever there as a memorial of the disgrace that CCp and Eve suffered.I can already see a new guy asking; -Whats the use of the CQ?I cant do AN...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.05 05:54:00
|
6. PvP agents: PvP on demand for casuals and carebears - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nestara Aldent wrote: @Tyme You like CTF? Great! However, CTF and battlegrounds aren't for this game, so you'll have to play to that other game. And I'll now add, battlegrounds were invented because that other MMO couldn't handle large open...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.05 05:52:00
|
7. MAKE TIER 2 T2 BATTLECRUISERS, pleas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Fon Revedhort wrote: So much stupidity in this thread... I can't help smiling. Your fugly drake was introduced at least a year later after NH and the same for the rest. So GFY. And no, you can't get you already overpowered ships in tech2 hull...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.05 05:51:00
|
8. MAKE TIER 2 T2 BATTLECRUISERS, pleas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Markus Reese wrote: Tyme Xandr wrote: Markus Reese wrote: Playing the TL:DR card, so if it was said already, meh. Anyways, the T2 tier 2s essentially already exist, just with the T1 skins. Nighthawk is pretty much a drake. Sliep->Cane...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.05 00:08:00
|
9. [Incarna] Don't abandon it! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nestara Aldent wrote: Those who seek primarily to show their character and socialize have games tailored for them. EVE's universe goes way beyond a ship in space. Many of the great stories of EVE center around a character and his relationsh...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.04 20:44:00
|
10. [Incarna] Don't abandon it! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
They have been put on the backburner for now. Once CCP satiates the idiots of New Eden with some new ships and 'stuffz' they will continue working on Incarna, although probably at a slower pace. I expect they wont bring it out in rolling expansio...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.04 16:34:00
|
11. Tech 2 Battleships... a 3rd? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Maybe make them marauders and offer the races other weapon set bonuses. For instance: Caldari - Hybrid bonus. Gallente - Large drone bay with drone bonuses. Amarr - Missile bonuses (like the damnation, etc). Minmatar - Uhm ... missile ... bonuses...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.04 15:53:00
|
12. Hi-sec Jihad ganking isk penalties - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
These fines will mean absolutely nothing. These guys would make sub-alts to their accounts or PLEX for Buddy Invite accounts (essentially a free 51 day trial alongside ur now paid one month). After these are made they can be trained for a few hou...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.04 07:56:00
|
13. Android client? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Isnt android programming essentially java? Shouldnt be too difficult to make a condensed program for the things OP requested especially since CCP can access their own servers. These mobile devices are surprisingly simple to code.
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.04 07:48:00
|
14. PvP agents: PvP on demand for casuals and carebears - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nestara Aldent wrote: BTW I never played CTF - not even in Quake III. I played FFA only because CTF is silly. It's mechanics is silly. You capture the flag to return it to home base? Ridiculous. I like CTF in FPSes.
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.04 07:43:00
|
15. [DEMAND] MAKE DRONE CONTROL UNITS A PASSIVE MOD! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jazz Styles wrote: It always kinda bugged me to have to keep switching the damn things on, so I support this - there's no downside to making them passive modules, and the upside is less tedium. Where would EVE be without tedium? I suggest th...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.04 07:41:00
|
16. MAKE TIER 2 T2 BATTLECRUISERS, pleas - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Markus Reese wrote: Playing the TL:DR card, so if it was said already, meh. Anyways, the T2 tier 2s essentially already exist, just with the T1 skins. Nighthawk is pretty much a drake. Sliep->Cane Absolution->harbinger, simply in their p...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.04 07:34:00
|
17. Blaster, Gallente and its issues. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
u57I wrote: Tyme Xandr wrote: I dont remember reading anything about damage for rails though. . http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=3012 read again Ah that came out while my region of America had no power, thanks ...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.01 15:51:00
|
18. Blaster, Gallente and its issues. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gallente have drone boats and turret boats. They have two weapon types Hybrid and Drone. This is much like Caldari has Missile boats and turret boats as their race is split Hybrid/Missile. With the new hybrid fixes coming out they are making hyb...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.11.01 15:31:00
|
19. CQ/NeX immersion changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gael Itrus wrote: So your reasoning is that if it doesn't have an effect on gameplay and you have to purchase it, it shouldn't be destructible There are countless items in this game that fit the bill, or is there some arbitrary cost to an i...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.10.29 16:48:00
|
20. An Honest Proposal: Standings, Reverse the Nerf! Racial Capitals, And The Gunner... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I suppose, but it takes a while to ruin ur standings with another faction. I've learned a lot of stuff early on in EVE through Corp members. your best bet to survive and learn in EVE is one of two ways: 1. Make mistakes and learn. 2. Make some f...
- by Tyme Xandr - at 2011.10.29 04:54:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |