Pages: [1] 2 |
1. wtf is wrong with the test server... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Apart from that, you're better off copying the whole live client to the test server folder every time they do a major patch/change, and THEN patch it. That keeps any issues at bay most of the time. Self-proclaimed idiot
- by Tzar'rim - at 2009.07.07 08:54:00
|
2. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Recloak delay is now 30 seconds... and the range is still crap so uhm, you uncloak, get to fire 1-2 volleys tops and then provide fine lewt to your target? Self-proclaimed idiot
- by Tzar'rim - at 2009.04.13 09:22:00
|
3. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Zostera One point that escaped me so far. If the new bomber is not a solo ship, if it runs in packs at close range.... How are we all going to avoid decloaking each other on the way in? Zos As covops have been doing s...
- by Tzar'rim - at 2009.04.04 09:41:00
|
4. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
You're backpedaling. IF you want to comment on changes like you do and somehow 'in your mind' change other stats to complement/offset your own changes, then you should have probably mentioned those. Rather than pointing at others for not being abl...
- by Tzar'rim - at 2009.04.03 09:22:00
|
5. Idea for a change to QR tackling, especially to help blaster/AC boats - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Having to make choices is good having cookiecutter ships/modules/setups is bad So no. Self-proclaimed idiot
- by Tzar'rim - at 2009.04.03 09:02:00
|
6. covert ops cloaking device 2 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Overbrain It has always been there , you can also drop it down to 6 second delay with cloaking skill V . There's also rigs for it, so recons that want to go 'wabbit hunting' can do so. Self-proclaimed idiot
- by Tzar'rim - at 2009.04.03 08:38:00
|
7. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Overbrain Some of my friends asked me "The widow can warp cloaked right ?" And i said -No Then they said "Woow, then it must suck ! , i would never train for one" Common sense indicates that Black ops cloaking should be no ...
- by Tzar'rim - at 2009.04.03 08:23:00
|
8. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Blackops should never ever be allowed to use covert cloaks, OR they can have the cloak but have a 15-20 second targeting delay after decloaking. If they don't and get a cloak they will become uber recons, which is far too powerful. Giving them a ...
- by Tzar'rim - at 2009.04.03 08:03:00
|
9. ECM Ships - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
In a 0.0/fleet environment you might be correct but for small gangs or solo work it doesn't really make a difference. In fact if you look at recon wolfpacks you lose absolutely nothing and gain some dps, it's not like falcons actually had any good...
- by Tzar'rim - at 2009.03.27 13:19:00
|
10. ECM Ships - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Uhm, it might be me (not at all having read the whole thread) but how is this a nerf? Self-proclaimed idiot
- by Tzar'rim - at 2009.03.27 12:52:00
|
11. Fix the Noobkiller: "Prefer shorter -- ignore security status" - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It's just not logical for the initial AP setting to allow for low sec routes, especially so when the AP will not stop before entering low sec. Never was, never will be. Self-proclaimed idiot
- by Tzar'rim - at 2009.02.27 18:41:00
|
12. So that new fitting screen eh? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Looks over usefulness, don't like it.
- by Tzar'rim - at 2009.02.16 12:33:00
|
13. Define "rediculous amount of time" - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Traveling Salesman Problem
- by Tzar'rim - at 2009.02.03 21:10:00
|
14. Grouping smartbombs - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Tzar''rim on 24/11/2008 17:57:36 Well, there is ofcourse a reason to not fire them at the same time but isn't that up to the user? If he wants to group his SB's then that would be his choice. Don't see the problem tbh.
- by Tzar'rim - at 2008.11.24 17:57:00
|
15. Zulupark, in regards to the tempest. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I rather like my 2 heavy neuts so personally I don't see how adding a turretslot would solve anything. The problem is more with the ammo itself and the fact that Minnie's tactics (speed&agility) are mostly lost on BSes. They lack sturdyness and D...
- by Tzar'rim - at 2008.11.15 10:40:00
|
16. Why the changes to BPO lockdown? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Mephysto This is correcting a bug that could potentially leave a bpo in a situation where no-one can access it after a vote timeout. While that may be true, have a look at this thread.
- by Tzar'rim - at 2008.11.09 20:55:00
|
17. The Orca and Industrial Cores - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The Orca seems to be meant as a buffer between miners and hauler, no more, no less. Due to the buffer there's less spikes in supply/demand and your ore is more secure. It's not an uberwtfpwnminingmonstah.
- by Tzar'rim - at 2008.11.09 20:52:00
|
18. Please move repair office on the test server on a first statition - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quite annoying to not have a repair facility, so instead I just buy/make new ships which is more time consuming and puts more strain on the database. It's just not logical right now. I can understand that you can't easily switch the station servic...
- by Tzar'rim - at 2008.11.08 13:46:00
|
19. If you thought it was bad before..... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Allen Ramses Originally by: Murina While im sure this means a lot to you il be honest and say im not much of a stat junkie and if i wanna test summat i hop on sissi find somebody with the appropriate skills and setup...
- by Tzar'rim - at 2008.11.07 09:49:00
|
20. Zulupark, in regards to the tempest. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Tzar''rim on 06/11/2008 22:25:53 It's lower on armor than other tier 2 BS (that includes the Raven) and has less kinetic resists, in favour of EM. Kinetic is a lot more used than EM and with most tanking setups EM will already be hi...
- by Tzar'rim - at 2008.11.06 22:23:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |