Pages: 1 2 3 [4] |
61. Module Delay Since Returning after F2P - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm aware how cloaking works, as I said I've been flying cloaked ships since 2012. This is not a question of simply being moving first. Where there was previously a smooth, reliable rhythm to move-then-cloak, every system, every time; there is now...
- by Uthgaard - at 2017.05.23 23:12:04
|
62. Advanced Audio Settings Changes - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Antiquarian wrote: Audio has looked over the feedback and has decided to hold off on additional changes for the continuing rework of settings. After today's (16/05/2017) patch, there will be no further alterations to the Advanced Audio Set...
- by Uthgaard - at 2017.05.23 22:56:07
|
63. Module Delay Since Returning after F2P - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Right, I didn't say it only happened to cloaking modules, I simply used those as an example. It applies to anything you click after coming out of a gate cloak. Almost all of the ships I fly are cloaked ships, so the rhythm of align-cloak was very...
- by Uthgaard - at 2017.05.23 20:12:47
|
64. Module Delay Since Returning after F2P - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I've noticed much worse module delay since returning, that wasn't present when I the game played before it went F2P. This is mostly a problem when this occurs after a gate cloak. Previously, I could tap align, then tap cloak, and I could rely on ...
- by Uthgaard - at 2017.05.23 17:33:03
|
65. Announcement:EVE Online: Ascension - General feedback (PC) - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I'm glad it's free to play, so I didn't have to drop a subscription fee to learn the game had gone to ****. Wound up here while looking for a way to get the old Aura voice back (which I've learned you can't). Found a lot of other people who also ...
- by Uthgaard - at 2017.05.07 08:16:18
|
66. Sticky:Dev blog: CSM meeting minutes are out - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Two step wrote: The CSM will also be doing another town hall meeting to talk about the minutes in the next few weeks or so. CCP opens with some productive discussion of direction, trying to involve you all, and you all turn it into 50 pages ...
- by Uthgaard - at 2013.01.25 17:17:00
|
67. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Now the question is when? Because this makes it sound like they're due very soon, and all previous posts have assured everyone that they would not be coming in with the Dec 4 patch.
- by Uthgaard - at 2012.11.10 19:16:00
|
68. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
That statement about receiving multiple racial bc/dest to V. It was missing from his explanation. You have to make a pretty heavy assumption to get there from the two examples he gave: the two examples make it look like you would only get one.
- by Uthgaard - at 2012.11.10 19:11:00
|
69. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kim Blackstone wrote: Uthgaard wrote: Quote: Reimbursement details: Let us repeat again: if you could fly it before, you will be able to do so after the change. Technically it means if you are able to fly an Oracle by having Amarr Crui...
- by Uthgaard - at 2012.11.10 18:24:00
|
70. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quote: Reimbursement details: Let us repeat again: if you could fly it before, you will be able to do so after the change. Technically it means if you are able to fly an Oracle by having Amarr Cruisers 3 and Battlecruisers 3, we will remove ...
- by Uthgaard - at 2012.11.10 10:53:00
|
71. AFK Stealth Pilots in 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It appears that perhaps pvp happened on your face. I can understand your fear of the pvpness. But you shouldn't let one cocky gentleman ruin your love for null sec. Embrace the pvpness. It might shoot you, it might penetrate your hull. But those...
- by Uthgaard - at 2012.10.28 06:19:00
|
72. AFK Stealth Pilots in 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It seems you're suffering from mood swings. One should not go from extreme sadness to extreme joys so rapidly. I'm afraid it appears you have a psychiatric disorder to go with your inability to logic. Sadly; because badly.
- by Uthgaard - at 2012.10.28 05:01:00
|
73. AFK Stealth Pilots in 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What I said can clearly be read. If it confused you, you may read it again. You can even do it sadly.
- by Uthgaard - at 2012.10.28 04:56:00
|
74. AFK Stealth Pilots in 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Simetraz wrote: Welcome to the saddest tactic in the game. ... Sadly CCP and the vast majority of he players don't want to change it so nothing will ever happen. Sound the alarm!! Bring the WHAAAAMBULANCE!! SOMEONE IS AFK ON THE INT...
- by Uthgaard - at 2012.10.28 04:29:00
|
75. AFK Stealth Pilots in 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No one is forcing you to stay docked. You're choosing to, because you're afraid of pvp happening, in null sec. If you're afraid of pvp happening, you shouldn't be in null sec. The problem isn't that you see someone in local, it's that you expect s...
- by Uthgaard - at 2012.10.28 03:13:00
|
76. Sticky:New dev blog: Ship Balancing: Mining Barges - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The issue is that while in theory, it sounds good to make the hulk dependent on a group, and not a solo mining option, in practice, it doesn't work out that way. What happened was the hulk was turned into a quarter of a billion isk ship that can ...
- by Uthgaard - at 2012.08.13 16:52:00
|
77. Sticky:New dev blog: Ship Balancing: Mining Barges - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Perhaps you noticed the mention of ivory towers. Thank you for illustrating my point flawlessly. Attempt to stop bleating your 'shoulds' long enough to consider the difference between the intent and the impact. One would not expect to take down a...
- by Uthgaard - at 2012.08.09 00:57:00
|
78. Sticky:New dev blog: Ship Balancing: Mining Barges - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
One needs to consider the point at which a change goes from tuning and balance, and crosses over into the realm of different design. The amount of tank on a barge has typically been an irrelevant factor in the decision to steal a ship's ore. In pa...
- by Uthgaard - at 2012.08.09 00:51:00
|
79. Mission Difficulty Not in Line with Mission Level (Cut-Throat Competition) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Thanks for replying. In the future, take the time to ensure you read everything correctly. It will prevent your embarrassment. This mission does not state bring friends. This mission does not state that there is anything remotely more challenging...
- by Uthgaard - at 2012.07.22 01:22:00
|
80. Mission Difficulty Not in Line with Mission Level (Cut-Throat Competition) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The Level 3 Mission Cut-Throat Competition has a difficulty level that is extremely disproportionate to all other Level 3 Missions. Even level 3 missions that provide a warning that there will be additional difficulty due to various factors,do not...
- by Uthgaard - at 2012.07.22 01:01:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |