Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
101. Wardecs Redux - Letting the defender win - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Daichi Yamato wrote: (stuff) I like this... like it a lot. What about from the attacker side though? I mean otherwise, they can permadec their WTs (not that it's a bad thing, but they should get a victory condition too).
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 19:10:04
|
102. War on Gankers - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Velicitia wrote: While true, you have to look at the population that was doing this. It wasn't some 2 month old scrubs, but the vets who've been here practically forever (some HAVE been here forever). CCP wasn't looking ...
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 17:40:11
|
103. Wardecs Redux - Letting the defender win - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Toriessian wrote: Blobbing style tactics are perfectly legitimate I never said they weren't ... however, I was trying to avoid situations of "one BS and 45 noobships" . I mean, sure you COULD do that, but at a reduced "adjusted value" for the...
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 17:31:55
|
104. Concord system broken? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Cheese Crackers wrote: There is a reason why cows dont have claws or sharp viscous teeth :> ...op cows Because they're female, and rely on the protection of the bulls. Kinda like how miners rely on the protection of their corpmates ...
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 14:59:50
|
105. War on Gankers - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Lady Areola Fappington wrote: In fact, CCP has made it pretty clear that if it came down to losing subs vs. changing their own visions for Eve, they'll sacrifice the subs. Bull! They did a 180 on their vision for EVE when...
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 14:47:50
|
106. Tired of Pointless Wars... - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Anatoly Arji wrote: (stuff) This guy gets EVE.
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 14:17:39
|
107. Wardecs Redux - Letting the defender win - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Was reading one of the recent "wars are broken" threads in War & Tactics, and one of the people had a decent idea of letting the defenders win by simply winning the ISK War, then at the end of the week, "winning" gets the defender the ISK that...
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 14:15:07
|
108. Tired of Pointless Wars... - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Kagura Nikon wrote: A carrot you say? Sure we coudl ahve better carrots. I still think high sec POCOs and PI should make more money and minimum taxes shoudl be higher. Also The war tax should be GIVEN to the war target is they manage to win th...
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 12:47:47
|
109. Better solution to the bumping problem - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Artassaut wrote: Colette Kassia wrote: Get further through a second bump-warp would require another ship to be involved. CCP could set it up so that any time you intentionally try to warp to a fleet member or bookmark that is an improper ...
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 10:30:40
|
110. Got Concorded after shooting someone with suspect flag - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Sabriz Adoudel wrote: Velicitia wrote: Meh, red safety best safety. If you live in highsec, permanent red safety is one of the silliest things you can do, up there with autopiloting a freighter through Uedama or mining without a permit i...
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 04:32:56
|
111. Announcement From Scott Bacon - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Sabriz Adoudel wrote: More common than the use of real-life slurs was the banning of people from the channel for providing legitimate good advice to avoid ganking. Suggesting to people that, if they want to haul and avoid being ganked themsel...
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 04:27:38
|
112. Local - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yep, see post above
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 02:19:15
|
113. Got Concorded after shooting someone with suspect flag - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Meh, red safety best safety.
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 00:39:23
|
114. War on Gankers - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Market McSelling Alt wrote: Hiasa Kite wrote: Market McSelling Alt wrote: They are doing it to grief, that is all. Or returning risk-reward back to HiSec mining, or helping players learn the game, or encouraging players to do something ...
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 00:20:35
|
115. Concord system broken? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Tengu Grib wrote: Roonia wrote: Umm yes. More EHP than battleships, but no offensive ability. I have a Skiff fit that'd I'd love to fight you with. Seeing as you're all PVP and not really a miner despite this post, and that it has zero o...
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.07 00:10:39
|
116. Got Concorded after shooting someone with suspect flag - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Downside of red safety settings ;) you sure you ONLY have it "yellow AND flashy" for suspects, and didn't also turn it on for "below zero" sec status?
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.06 17:25:14
|
117. Concord system broken? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Chainsaw Plankton wrote: ... blissfully unaware orca pilot. So ... pretty much all of them then @ Mag's -- Falcon's Fatality (edit -- yeah, yeah totally wrong game ... but I couldn't come up with something snarky & eve-sounding)
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.06 14:08:41
|
118. Can't rely on basic ship navigation? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
McChicken Combo HalfMayo wrote: Velicitia wrote: For standard warping, you will land on a sphere of r=2500 meters from the "0-point" of your warp destination (be it a bookmark, station, POS, gate, whatever). It will be anywhere on the sphere...
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.04 16:00:58
|
119. Can't rely on basic ship navigation? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Primary This Rifter wrote: Velicitia wrote: Alec Arbosa wrote: Velicitia wrote: Alec Arbosa wrote: Its not a margin of error I can control, then what's the point of it existing except to be some random distance from 0 you will land?...
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.04 03:55:18
|
120. Astecus, a response to something i read somewhere - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Veers Belvar wrote: Max Deveron wrote: Then why dont you do so? all you have to do is impose some security. 1.) Hire miners looking for a corp and have ways for them to get decent profits while assisting the corp 2,.) Hire missioners 3.) S...
- by Velicitia - at 2015.01.04 01:50:07
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |