| Pages: [1] |
1. Large Micro Jump Drive - poor UI limits its usage - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Add a requirement of consuming an 800 cap booster per activation and make it a straight reload cycle .. an emergency micro-warp jump (however limited in range) such as provided by it could/should/would mandate an exorbitant energy consumption any ...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2012.12.20 15:11:00
|
2. [Winter] Market changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
What is the plan for the contract system? I ask because you are rapidly approaching a point where anything worthwhile is in the main database (market), thus obsoleting contracts in their entirety. Please tell me that the plan is to use it for tre...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2012.10.17 08:22:00
|
3. Sticky:Testing ASB adjustments on Duality - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Liang Nuren wrote: This seems like it doesn't address any of the really critical failings of the ASB. But, I'll test it out. /shrug -Liang Seconded. Seems to be odd changes considering.
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2012.09.20 07:06:00
|
4. Self-destruct changes on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Tyrrax Thorrk wrote: Veshta you obviously don't like blobbing and yet you want people to be able to "scuttle" their ship if their opponent doesn't blob enough ? (i can only assume you mean blobbing when you say griefs and ganks) You'll get more...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2012.07.31 20:08:00
|
5. Self-destruct changes on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
TheGunslinger42 wrote: Roime wrote: Veshta Yoshida wrote: Why? Why in hell do you cater so overtly to the very small (but insanely loud(mouthed)) group of players called griefers/gankers? What makes you think that this has anything ...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2012.07.31 13:11:00
|
6. Self-destruct changes on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Why? Why in hell do you cater so overtly to the very small (but insanely loud(mouthed)) group of players called griefers/gankers? I would/could be fine with mails being generated or loot dropping, but not both. If this is implemented then there ...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2012.07.31 07:36:00
|
7. Faction Warfare Complexes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
You mean to say that CCP are planning on ruining FW under the guise of providing a fix? Why I never!!! Adding any sort of incentives or consequences without first addressing the glaring oversights, bugs and imbalances present in FW, will go so fa...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2012.05.06 16:33:00
|
8. Sticky:Feedback thread: Launcher on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Appreciate the launcher, but: CCP Cascade wrote: ...Q: What about Manual patches? A: Manual patches will also go away, but for those of you who have multiple computers and only wish to download the data once from the internet, there is an optio...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2012.04.28 05:50:00
|
9. Why your Titan fix will fail horribly - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: ...This is a quick, surgical adjustment to solve a specific issue we have identified. It's not a general titan balance pass, and we don't consider titans "done" after this change. Titans will require significant further cha...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2012.03.18 11:43:00
|
10. Account expired although it hasnt (Singularity) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Wrong place to put it. Contact customer support. Remember to ask mods to delete/lock this thread.
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2011.06.13 17:10:00
|
11. Pirate ship changes for Dominion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Mkiaki I see much tears The tears will be "PvP'ers" flying ships that are so far ahead of everything else that nothing will ever engage them. Faction ships SHOULD be better than T1 and ensure a win against T1 when flow...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2009.09.12 10:43:00
|
12. Pirate ship changes for Dominion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Frigate with web strength bonus AND equivalent of 6 blasters with enough speed to never having to use a MWD? And how do you expect the Serpentis frig to be beaten by anything? Good that you started toying around with other factors, but please ke...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2009.09.12 09:12:00
|
13. TITAN CHANGES - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: VoiceInTheDesert Yes, they are ridiculously powerful with these changes, but they cost 40billion and 15 billion respectively...for just the hull. They SHOULD be omgwtf machines, but at a cost high enough to where they are no...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2009.09.12 07:56:00
|
14. CCP's plan for POS Fuel Pellets - streamlining the fuelling experience - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
If all goes well POS/Sovereignty mechanics will change so dramatically that fuel will be the least of our problems. Fuel Pellets made sense as a band-aid for status quo. Now that they are looking at the whole she-bang it doesn't make much sense t...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2009.07.06 22:47:00
|
15. FW complexes and DT - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Veshta Yoshida on 13/11/2008 09:27:59 Originally by: KillJoy Tseng ...If you're being militarily outclassed 19 hours a day, every day, as you seem to be saying you are... I never said that, I said outnumbered. There is a ...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2008.11.13 09:25:00
|
16. FW complexes and DT - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Kourmonen was the last of the systems the Minmatar managed to capture under the massively faulty system in place immediately after FW was released. Amarr has not 'won' anything, merely completed the reset that CCP quite honestly should have done ...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2008.11.12 23:43:00
|
17. Extensive AF testing on Sisi - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I have done a couple of AF runs with a fellow Amarrian faithful, using a Vengeance+Retribution combo. Vengeance provides the tackle and drone defence (rockets eat even lights in a volley or two) and Retribution dealing the damage. We have take...
- by Veshta Yoshida - at 2008.07.29 15:45:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |