Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
41. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
ergherhdfgh wrote: Andrea Keuvo wrote: Please tell me that once the Entosis link is activated on a structure it will not be dependent on maintaining a target lock on the structure. If it does, I'm certain that some entities known for blobbin...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.03.04 07:56:12
|
42. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
okay so after some thought, cool down and think time I have some questions which I think would be good to know the answer to and are pertinent to the sov system at play. So for each structure TCU, IHUB, Station, the entosis module initially reinf...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.03.04 07:48:38
|
43. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Wrote a few responses earlier today and came to a realization. Every time they do a major dev blgo in the last 2 years basically I find myself liking the game less and less. I also know im one of many who feel this way. You would think that somet...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.03.04 01:07:24
|
44. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
M1k3y Koontz wrote: Vigilanta wrote: also, did it not occur to you that sov war is now basically a giant frigate fleet, with little or no reason to use anything larger, due to guns playing no part in it, just mobility? You have to sit aro...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.03.03 18:14:59
|
45. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
a small part of my wonders if CCP get liek ultra hard nipples when they release these major change blogs, rarely are they filled with OMG amazing, its 85% WTF and 15% lol i love the tears these guys are generating. CCP = the cable company in tha...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.03.03 17:38:30
|
46. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
also, did it not occur to you that sov war is now basically a giant frigate fleet, with little or no reason to use anything larger, due to guns playing no part in it, just mobility?
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.03.03 16:09:50
|
47. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
if you thought dominion was complicated, wait till you read this. Also, the entosis link gameplay is really really bad. The 4 hour vulnerable per day thing is also bad, your essentially making it so we have to run 4 hour long cta's which is lo...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.03.03 15:52:06
|
48. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Fighter assist removal = good, im all for it needed to be done Fighter and fighterbomber warp: Don't remove it, its a ncei uniqueness to the weapons system of a slow and hard to maneuver platform. I dont think fighters need to follow people into ...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.02.28 03:49:24
|
49. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gabriel Elarik wrote: Nothing should be 100% safe in eve make a safe cloak 100% safe thats wrong nothing else as long as he is cloaked he cant harm anyone I agree, cloaking should not be 100% safe (hint it is now), how people are not up i...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.01.20 19:10:48
|
50. Sticky:Dev blog: A Glimpse into the Future of Ship Skins - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Can you make it so i can pay for different colored pos forcefields, id really like my pos shield to be purple, or stripper hotpink
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.01.20 18:43:42
|
51. My intent to run for CSM X - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Are you happy with the current state of the jump fatigue mechanics? Actually I will go into more depth here, I don't think any rational indivdual will argue that having fatigue as a part of the game is bad, but as currently implemented the upper ...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.01.13 06:37:32
|
52. June Ting for CSM10 - newbies and independent PVPers - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
June Ting wrote: Sovnull: Making smaller, less sp-intensive groups viable in null requires more gradations in quality of space, fewer regions like the drone regions and period basis where you *have* to be blue to your neighbors to run logisti...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.01.13 06:30:23
|
53. My intent to run for CSM X - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
corbexx wrote: Sort Dragon wrote: corbexx wrote: whats your thoughts on fighter assign. both in small scale, 20 fighters assigned to a few interceptors and large scale where fighters are assigned in huge amounts (several hundred) The ...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.01.10 05:09:56
|
54. My intent to run for CSM X - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
I order to secure my vote i need to know your opinion of ishtars, and if you were a soup which soup would you be. He usually talks sense an generally has good idea, you have my support.
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.01.09 15:01:35
|
55. Any 03 players still here? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I ahve a coupel in my corp, i think there are more 03 players active than most would think, im 04' myself on my first char
- by Vigilanta - at 2014.12.23 23:42:04
|
56. Survey for Structures in EVE - Your opinion matters! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Poor questions, you force us to give misleading answers. You ask us in a number of places to rank gameplay elements. This jsut tells you we think something is better or worse than something else, which gives the illusion that we think X element is...
- by Vigilanta - at 2014.12.18 18:49:06
|
57. We want your corp little things! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Epikurus wrote: Close offices remotely please. Very little but very useful. you already can :). corporation tab, office list if you right click you can unrent them
- by Vigilanta - at 2014.12.18 11:12:21
|
58. We want your corp little things! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Okay Lets dig in shall we? with a mind towards little things, 1. Allow us to upload custom corp logos just like you do with alliance logos. The back end and process clearly exists, it would nice if we could differentiate our corps even more. 2....
- by Vigilanta - at 2014.12.18 08:52:56
|
59. Conflict. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement.... Sabriz for CSM10 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
may seem a bit silly but there are 2 sides to the coin of the position you put forth. I wonder if you could perhaps provide some clarification? You spend a lot of time talking about care bears and risk versus reward. While I do tend to agree with...
- by Vigilanta - at 2014.11.25 07:11:11
|
60. Sticky:Dev Blog - A new look for EVEGÇÖs UI GÇô feedback needed! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Nullarbor wrote: Vigilanta wrote: looks cool, but one question. If we prefer the old UI, will we be able to choose to use the old one instead? I remind you of like every other time we have been forced in to the mandatory upgrade and what...
- by Vigilanta - at 2014.11.07 15:25:38
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |