Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
101. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
d0cTeR9 wrote: They are quite weak. People are easily killing them left and right, without even trying hard. That's because the owners aren't defending them.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.03 00:54:49
|
102. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Shayla Etherodyne wrote: Someone still remember how it was possible to put a criminal flag on a miner grabbing the ore in a jetcan but not moving it to your bay. It become "owned" by the player grabbing it, but he didn't received a flag as he ...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 23:48:32
|
103. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: I recall the days of "Aggro Fu", when an alliance called TEARS was active. On the surface it just plain looked bad. It was a gotcha game, "Oh you don't know this one loophole to the addendum of the agro rule that was ...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 19:51:32
|
104. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: I have seen people getting upset because the old mechanics which often resulted in a confused carebear being shootable for no explainable reason were replaced by crimewatch 2.0. I saw a lot of people completely bemused how they...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 18:33:26
|
105. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: CCP made a gross error in making these Medium Citadels useless. The failure of CCP to provide either content driving objects and resources in highsec or mechanics that enable content creation is pretty legendary at this point....
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 15:46:41
|
106. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I saw you explode it was the funny.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 14:13:23
|
107. VERY Poor support - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I feel like the quality of GM responses has actually improved over time, even if response time got worse. Time was people in my alliance routinely got warns and/or bans over things that literally didn't happen because GMs didn't actually investig...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 14:12:32
|
108. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I am always right about war decs. SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 13:59:13
|
109. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: There is another problem in that there is absolutely no value in putting a Medium up period, unless you want it as a a force multiplier. I mean I would do it for that if all my corp mates were active that is... They're pretty ...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 13:51:13
|
110. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: For me a Citadel should be a force multiplier for a defending fleet and my initial feeling was that it was about right, people gave the impression it was easy which is why I called it chickenshit level, but if it requires 5 BS a...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 13:34:38
|
111. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
They aren't weak , though. They're actually pretty powerful, their EWAR is very effective, they neut a ton, are completely immune to electronic and capacitor warfare, do more dps than any sub capital ship that exists and they don't require any sk...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 13:10:47
|
112. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
In the time scale we're talking about you'd have to suicide on it over and over again for hours to "bump" the repair timer. That would be a frankly vomit inducing abuse of the mechanic and I'm not even 100% certain it would actually work (citadel ...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 12:34:58
|
113. Please let us reenact the Citadel Trailer... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
possibly this is what the smartbombing Rohk was trying to do in perimeter yesterday
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 11:47:21
|
114. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Also broken in regard to citadels in that the anchoring timer is the same length as the timer for wars becoming active, making it basically impossible for anyone to attack a citadel when it enters its first vulnerability window when it finishes an...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 11:35:29
|
115. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: They had some ships in space which died, three Navy Domi's. EDIT: The defences look chickenshit to me which is rather sad, what's wrong in having a challenge in this game, must everything be easy? inaccurate, they lost 2 navy...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 11:18:10
|
116. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Large citadels will probably be an entirely different affair.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 06:24:19
|
117. Perimeter Citadel Battle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pearl Necklace Badasaz wrote: I didnt see the fight, did the defending station have weapons or did it get taken down too fast for subcap launchers, rigs, and whatnot They just tanked it. The defenders didn't put out a fleet of any kind and a...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 05:04:34
|
118. why does it seem like CCP is castrating high sec content creators - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Brokk Witgenstein wrote: Perhaps CCP plans on toning down highsec rewards and replacing a lot of highsec space with lowsec? Like less or equal than .7 would do the trick. Hahahahahahahahahahahaha.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.02 04:58:47
|
119. why does it seem like CCP is castrating high sec content creators - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Issler Dainze wrote: Ganking is not content, it is standard game play in the sandbox. Nothing is "created". I'm not saying don't gank, just don't claim you created anything when you did, all you did was play Eve as intended. This is demonstra...
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.05.01 22:55:30
|
120. Remembering? Why? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
We have a corp hanger division for corpses. I look through it and am reminded of the good times, back when wars were cheap, trade hub camping alliances had like 70 people in them and the carebears tried to shoot back at you.
- by Vimsy Vortis - at 2016.04.19 19:28:01
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |