Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 |
381. Remove Learning Skills! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
My experience started the first day with learning skills. www.eve-players.com
- by ViolenTUK - at 2008.01.19 19:07:00
|
382. Remove Learning Skills! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Khudo + i bet that i we could make some polls against learning... i bet the "against" will win. I have been in 2 alliances and met hundreds of people playing eve. There are many viewpoints and conflicting ideas but i h...
- by ViolenTUK - at 2008.01.19 16:31:00
|
383. Remove Learning Skills! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Khudo Put an universal 2000 sp/hour Or more or less and the problem is solved. This implies there is a problem. There isnĘt. Originally by: Xavia Cameron Tbh, Learning skills are one of the best things in the...
- by ViolenTUK - at 2008.01.19 14:15:00
|
384. Possible capital adjustment - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
A pointless and pathetic idea. Please remember it cost around 400 million to insure a Dreadnought and the insurance like other ships only lasts 3 months. A typical Capital ship would cost in excess of 200 million to fit. Capital ships need to have...
- by ViolenTUK - at 2008.01.19 11:56:00
|
385. Remove Learning Skills! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The Learning skills system is fine as it is. You dont have to train them its your choice. www.eve-players.com
- by ViolenTUK - at 2008.01.19 11:54:00
|
386. Capital ships are not eve. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Ive seen a megathron tank a carrier and take its shield out and into its armour before it had to warp off. Capitals can be countered. Deal with it. www.eve-players.com
- by ViolenTUK - at 2008.01.19 11:25:00
|
387. New Systems? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Should alliances that hold Sovereignty have the option to increase the security status of their systems and sign a treaty with concord to keep the security that way? www.eve-players.com
- by ViolenTUK - at 2008.01.18 19:17:00
|
388. Someone Stole My Carrier!!! - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Originally by: Shel0b it had a chimera hanging out inside that looked desperately in need of a pilot. Thats just great. www.eve-players.com
- by ViolenTUK - at 2008.01.12 12:55:00
|
389. Genius idea to end ISK farming (CCP, I demand a 5% cut as consultance) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malcanis CCP can cancel your account because they think your mom should wear her hair differently if they want. They don't need to play legal games to justify denying access to THEIR server. No. They cant cancel your...
- by ViolenTUK - at 2008.01.11 13:41:00
|
390. Questions for the more experienced player base.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ki An If it were me that had killed you, I'd have found the kill worth while just because of this post. This is like food for starved pirates. The more you smack and threaten and call names, the more pleasure the pirate deri...
- by ViolenTUK - at 2008.01.09 22:11:00
|
391. Questions for the more experienced player base.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What you describe is a risk in low sec. You need to be expecting it. You may find it beneficial to stay in high sec in your early days. You can run missions from level 1 right through to level 5 in high sec space. www.eve-players.com
- by ViolenTUK - at 2008.01.09 21:01:00
|
392. Bring back PvP for profit. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
We all know that there is a bounty system in place but there could be a statutory bounty for player ships. This neednĘt be a great deal it could be the lowest insurance pay off or something similar. This would be a way of returning some revenue fo...
- by ViolenTUK - at 2008.01.09 15:40:00
|
393. Is EVE about PvP? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ItĘs not central but it is important. EVE is whatever you want it to be. www.eve-players.com
- by ViolenTUK - at 2008.01.07 16:24:00
|
394. Self Destruct should void Insurance! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I think you should keep your insurance if you self destruct. If we were were to stop payouts in this manner then this would discourage pvp due to the consequences. www.eve-players.com
- by ViolenTUK - at 2008.01.03 21:50:00
|
395. Free War Removal Service - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
I think this is a great idea. All the best to the iMune Empire. www.eve-players.com
- by ViolenTUK - at 2007.12.31 17:40:00
|
396. Nerf can flipping - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
It isnt an exploit. As much as i dislike the idea. There are other ways this could be addresses but for now can flipping is here. www.eve-players.com
- by ViolenTUK - at 2007.12.31 00:56:00
|
397. Nerf can flipping - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Occasionally when this type of argument is presented someone will have the idea of changing the bounty system or kill right contracts. Instead of can flipping to initiate a pvp bout you would have rationed bounty/contract system. I cant decide if...
- by ViolenTUK - at 2007.12.30 12:45:00
|
398. The mother of all fixes! Let the flames begin! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kransthow No one would be forced to do anything, it's just if they wanted to continue to grind level 4s, a little risk would be thrown in the mix. High sec would still have level 3s for those with irrational fears of pvp ...
- by ViolenTUK - at 2007.12.29 14:01:00
|
399. Macro mining - Discuss here! (And not anywhere else!) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: ViolenTUK on 29/12/2007 13:20:58 It would help if CCP would clarify what they feel isk farming is. Surely players dont have a problem with ratting in low sec? Surely? www.eve-players.com
- by ViolenTUK - at 2007.12.29 13:19:00
|
400. Macro mining - Discuss here! (And not anywhere else!) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Macro miners are a problem theres no dispute in that. As for threads about macro miners on the forums we have to bear in mind at least one factor. For every 1 person that feels they need to post about it being a problem there are 100 that dont and...
- by ViolenTUK - at 2007.12.29 13:09:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |