Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Thoughts on GOON Manipulation of T2 BPOs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Otti Ottig wrote: oh and how does "value will go down" and "we won't take them away, and screw you" make u think that they will be removed? -value of something not existent can't go down IRRC they won't just be deleted, they'll get some...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.13 00:17:00
|
2. Thoughts on GOON Manipulation of T2 BPOs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
here you all go: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTTyMhSKY9E skip to 22:20 "i think we've been fairly consistently, publically of the opinion that we need to do something with t2 bpos for some time, I hope that's being taken into account in m...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.12 20:45:00
|
3. Thoughts on GOON Manipulation of T2 BPOs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Agata Matahari wrote: Wow, very qualified comment and such profound arguments. Seems you are pretty butthurt that 10 people seem to have t2 bpos and you don't. :D people who own t2 bpos are to be pitied for their low intellect not envied ev...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.12 17:18:00
|
4. Thoughts on GOON Manipulation of T2 BPOs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Otti Ottig wrote: 3) going into personal hangars of only a certain group of ppl is something CCP should never do imho, at least not in this scale(number of ppl, and value in isk) as everyone who is playing eve to grind might think "w/e im grin...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.09 14:42:00
|
5. What is the point of beeing in an industry corp now? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
you will want an industry corp to do higher-level manufacturing like teams and such however that would require actual gameplay besides fuel pos and entail more interaction with other players in this massively multiplayer online game and on that b...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.08 16:59:00
|
6. Thoughts on GOON Manipulation of T2 BPOs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
full disclosure: at some point i may get bored and buy a cheap t2 bpo just to have one i will then probably trash it just to show i can
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.08 16:55:00
|
7. Thoughts on GOON Manipulation of T2 BPOs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
and most goons started after the bpo lottery and i don't think any of our finance directors owns a single t2 bpo, we've had people advocate we get some as an alliance before and all those people quickly decided that was a bad idea once we showed t...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.08 16:18:00
|
8. Thoughts on GOON Manipulation of T2 BPOs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Nevyn Auscent wrote: Of course, you had made a bundle off them, then used that bundle to gain dominance of all the R64's instead when Tech got nerfed, giving you even greater dominance over EVE & the Tech 2 markets resource supply. So the ...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.08 16:13:00
|
9. Dev Blog: Researching, the Future: Stupidity - in Science and Industry [original thread]
DireNecessity wrote: As always, the devil is in the details . . . Weaselior, care to toss out a purely speculative number of what a sane Titan BPO research to perfect time would be? 6 months? 2 years? The idea being that we start with the top...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.06 22:16:00
|
10. Dev Blog: Researching, the Future: Stupidity - in Science and Industry [original thread]
LHA Tarawa wrote: The stated goal was to remove unnecessary complexity.... Well, they could have done the EXACT SAME THING by changing ME from int to float, and hiding it behind the UI. thats stupid and adds additional complexity while mak...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.06 22:14:00
|
11. Dev Blog: Researching, the Future: Stupidity - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Shoogie wrote: mynnna, you really need to learn reading comprehension. virtually anytime some pubbie says this it's because their argument has been blown out of the water and so their only response left is to stick their fingers in their ea...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.06 22:08:00
|
12. Dev Blog: Researching, the Future: Stupidity - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Shoogie wrote: Look at a titan blueprint. There are probably a few ME5 titan blueprints out there. There are certainly a few ME4 blueprints out there, and quite a few at ME3. On patch day, everyone with an ME5 blueprint automagically gets an M...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.02 20:31:00
|
13. Rorqual - I missed the fanfest stream. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Velicitia wrote: Weaselior wrote: 350125GO wrote: Weaselior wrote: the buffs that would make it worth putting a rorqual in a belt would need to be insane They'd be more likely to change it's role than to give it buffs. tell me th...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.02 20:28:00
|
14. Rorqual - I missed the fanfest stream. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
350125GO wrote: Weaselior wrote: the buffs that would make it worth putting a rorqual in a belt would need to be insane They'd be more likely to change it's role than to give it buffs. tell me the role that involves putting a 2b capita...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.02 19:43:00
|
15. Losses on simple reactions - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Tia Hibra wrote: Sid Uitra wrote: Simple reaction can be done on a medium tower. Yes this does reduce, but still, the majority of simple reactions lose millions. As for sov bonuses, a lot of the reactions *used* to be done in low sec, a...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.02 17:15:00
|
16. Rorqual - I missed the fanfest stream. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
the buffs that would make it worth putting a rorqual in a belt would need to be insane
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.02 17:13:00
|
17. Dev Blog: Researching, the Future: Stupidity - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Jack Mayhem wrote: I agree with Shoogie on all accounts. This is badly thought idea regarding long-term BPOs. It also removes choice and makes ALL BPOs the same. Before when entering new area of production, there was some excitement, check th...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.02 12:39:00
|
18. Dev Blog: Researching, the Future: Stupidity - in Science and Industry [original thread]
TigerXtrm wrote: You know what's stupid? How researching the first level is equal to researching all levels after that. That, and your post.
- by Weaselior - at 2014.04.29 14:52:00
|
19. Null sec industry changes - has anyone told the alliances? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
you only need industrial corps once you run out of pvpers who do industry as a hobby in pvp corps we'll see if we ever hit that point
- by Weaselior - at 2014.04.24 20:34:00
|
20. Summer Expansion Question - no one has bothered to even ask yet. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Milla Goodpussy wrote: Tau Cabalander wrote: Nothing. Job submission is when fees are charged, skills checked, etc. then wouldn't that pose a workaround of paying tax after patch day? despite "slots" going away could this be exploited...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.04.21 16:48:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |