Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 |
41. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Well, you're still stuck hoping they actually do anything instead of issue a wardec and then just ignore the corp.
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 21:25:00
|
42. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Mechael wrote: I'm curious, why was it determined that only defenders could bring in mercs, sorry, "allies" (don't we already have alliances?) in the first place? Why not allow anyone, attacker or aggressor, to bring in as many mercs as they ca...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 21:19:00
|
43. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
jade needs everyone he can get because he is terrified its as simple as that any amount of goons will beat him so he needs as much cannon fodder and chaff as he can find
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 21:05:00
|
44. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Seleene wrote: Weaselior wrote: You are not familiar with Jade, I see. Not a customer, back in the day? OFC I am. I'm just mad posting a bit. I thought that's what this thread was about? Did I make error?! you were a customer? not su...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 20:27:00
|
45. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Seleene wrote: It's just too dumb; I refuse to believe that you believe this stuff, Jade. The more you rabble about it along those lines, the less attention anyone is going to pay to you. Stick to talking about the actual mechanics and stop th...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 20:14:00
|
46. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: what exactly does goonswarm have to lose by being in a highsec war with anyone answer: nothing, because we've been using neutral alts in empire since 2006 dont give away our secrets!
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 19:29:00
|
47. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Tithi wrote: What doesn't make sense about this argument? "The Goonswarm CSM plants have no idea what their constituents want and they are using their influence to change game mechanics in ways that their alliance players won't actually like,...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 19:25:00
|
48. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Despite the general forum hurly-burly the reality is that the goonswarm rank and file is not the goonswarm leadership. I can quite imagine the common goons quite enjoying the wardecs - but the planners and leadership se...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 19:22:00
|
49. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: i cannot believe how much stock people are seriously putting into highsec wars this is amazing it's like you're playing a completely separate, sh ittier game than the rest of us Don't w...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 18:52:00
|
50. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Khanh'rhh wrote: The CFC's casus beli is your bad posting, and they should be free to wardec you forever and a day at whatever cost it incurs on them, if they wish to. Right, of course you also believe they should...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 18:43:00
|
51. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Lord Helghast wrote: no new mods :( was so looking forward to seeing the extreme rigs for frigates, or the micro jump drive get introduced, 1.1 seems a bit lackluster :(, i mean the v3 is pretty but :( still a sad panda Well, we're still wait...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 17:28:00
|
52. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
As a highsec coward who wants to hire as many useless corporations as i can find to swell my ranks and is completely unaware the ally system is intended to promote skilled mercs who you hire rather than just being used to evade the wardec cost at ...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 16:35:00
|
53. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Salpun wrote: Weaselior wrote: When you say "re-designed caldari drake" do you mean the model, or you're going to be tweaking ship stats? lol the old missle launchers are gone. Come join us on Sisi and see for your self that's sort of h...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 16:11:00
|
54. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
When you say "re-designed caldari drake" do you mean the model, or you're going to be tweaking ship stats?
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 16:04:00
|
55. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Goliath wrote: GÇó Adding some new items to FW LP stores GÇó Removing EWAR from all FW NPCs Isn't speedtanking FW complexes a huge issue? Shouldn't you be adding webs or something else to fix that inbalance (this is, apparently, complete...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 15:48:00
|
56. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: CCP Goliath wrote: Guys, before this goes on any further, kindly take off the hats and get real - we do not develop with one corp or alliance in mind... Seriously Goliath. This does look exactly like a change to s...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 15:37:00
|
57. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
aww man now we won't be at war with every highsec shitlord in eve
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 15:35:00
|
58. Are you kidding me....? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Is this all-or-nothing: i.e. if 100 people are targeting me, do I either break 0- locks or 100 locks, or do I break 95% or something like that?
- by Weaselior - at 2012.05.10 19:36:00
|
59. Why your Titan fix will fail horribly - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I agree with CynoNet Two's suggestions.
- by Weaselior - at 2012.03.19 23:41:00
|
60. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
the people demand more incoherent and self-entitled rants for supercap supremacy
- by Weaselior - at 2011.11.19 16:22:00
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |