Pages: 1 2 3 [4] |
61. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Phunnestyle wrote: I assumed you would have nothing that held water to say back, was correct ofc,but it surprised me that you tried to respond anyway. Yes some of what you had to say was legit,but an aweful lot & I mean soo much of what Goo...
- by Weaselior - at 2011.11.19 16:21:00
|
62. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Phunnestyle wrote: This would be a signifficant change, Goons actually saying something constructive & not nonscence WOW FACTOR. People whine for a reason,Goons whined for ages & ages that Supers where OP & they couldn't effectivel...
- by Weaselior - at 2011.11.18 21:18:00
|
63. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Venustas Blue wrote: Not intended to be offensive to you Goony,but CCP you cannot expect to calm peoples anger by eventually making room for a few more Fighters/fighter Bombers when you know your in the wrong,every Super Pilot out there knows ...
- by Weaselior - at 2011.11.18 20:47:00
|
64. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Charles Edisson wrote: Weaselior wrote: an ME2 nyx bpo couldn't be sold for NPC cost well before this was announced Possibly but were they going for 2/3 NPC price ? Probably. They were hideously overbought to satisfy a temporary surge...
- by Weaselior - at 2011.11.18 20:34:00
|
65. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
SC bpos have been glutted for ages ever since nyx bpcs were going for 2b+ and EVERYONE bought a bpo
- by Weaselior - at 2011.11.18 20:18:00
|
66. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
an ME2 nyx bpo couldn't be sold for NPC cost well before this was announced
- by Weaselior - at 2011.11.18 20:18:00
|
67. Feedback on Sansha Supercarrier - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Weaselior on 03/12/2010 22:33:52 Originally by: Kesper North Originally by: Mike deVoid Originally by: MotherMoon Edited by: MotherMoon on 03/12/2010 04:04:23 The other SCs can field 20 FBs (+1 for each D...
- by Weaselior - at 2010.12.03 22:34:00
|
68. Feedback on Sansha Supercarrier - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
All the bonuses of this ship (effective DCU bonus, fighter speed bonus) make this ideal for botting sanctums. I like it.
- by Weaselior - at 2010.12.03 22:25:00
|
69. Feedback on Sansha Supercarrier - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Douchie McNitpick Balance will surely improve by introducing another overpowered pile of ***** into the game. No matter how bad the stats are for this turd, it's still an overpowered ship without a counter. Congratulations ...
- by Weaselior - at 2010.11.12 00:16:00
|
70. Feedback on Sansha Supercarrier - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The best way to fix this is give it a 3-5% bonus per level to the effectiveness of all warfare links.
- by Weaselior - at 2010.11.11 19:46:00
|
71. Feedback on Sansha Supercarrier - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Weaselior on 11/11/2010 19:38:01 Edited by: Weaselior on 11/11/2010 19:37:15 Originally by: Khalia Nestune Seriously? This is high on fail. Like everyone above said, make this more useful. Otherwise, this will be the mo...
- by Weaselior - at 2010.11.11 19:37:00
|
72. Feedback on Sansha Supercarrier - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Reasons this is terrible: 1)Jump range bonus is useless because you go in alone 2)It splits the standard SC skills between two carrier skills, but adds nothing else: you must train up double the skills for no benefit 3)The extra dcu is a stupid b...
- by Weaselior - at 2010.11.11 17:11:00
|
73. Feedback on Sansha Supercarrier - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
This is a terrible ship and you should be ashamed of yourself for making it.
- by Weaselior - at 2010.11.11 17:04:00
|
74. Dominion Titan Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Abathur To clarify, nothing that was posted here ever made it to SiSi or will be going there. Further changes to capital weapons and ships based upon feedback from the forums, the CSM and FanFest round tables are stil...
- by Weaselior - at 2009.10.08 22:21:00
|
75. Dominion Titan Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Deva Blackfire Afaik there are also sov markers and sov marker jammers (the thingies to start breaking sov). And i guess those too will have decent HP. Otherwise spam + quick mop with battleships would happen every day. ...
- by Weaselior - at 2009.10.06 22:36:00
|
76. Dominion Titan Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Pringlescan Now what is unacceptable is the nerf this is giving to dreadnaughts. You already are replacing their role as capital damage dealers with the new changes Most cost-effective capital damage dealer, especially o...
- by Weaselior - at 2009.10.06 16:49:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |