Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
41. Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM 9 Results! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Xenuria wrote: I guess that makes sense. The CFC ballot had me right after Riverini. I am not saying that PTP was better than the current STV, I am just saying that being able to nuke a candidate by having your bloc put them in last place on ...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.10 17:59:00
|
42. Sticky:Dev blog: The Price of Change - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sigras wrote: Has any additional thought been put to a bonus for multiple starbase arrays? the issue is not one of thought, but what can be done with the god-awful pos code
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.10 15:55:00
|
43. Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM 9 Results! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
i'm going to start a Draft Dinsdale campaign for next year's csm
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.10 15:06:00
|
44. Sticky:Dev blog: Researching, the Future - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Darin Vanar wrote: Quoting posts also assumes you have read through enough of the thread to know what we were talking about. The math is there. Doesn't need me to drudge up what we went through 5 pages ago. Unless you're not just here to trol...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.10 14:36:00
|
45. Sticky:Dev blog: Researching, the Future - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quintessen wrote: I'm all for partial progress. I'm not sure I'm for that partial progress affecting gains. Really though, if they eliminate the major increases in research times doesn't a lot of this go away? If you could get there in 6 month...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.10 14:32:00
|
46. Sticky:Dev blog: Researching, the Future - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
LHA Tarawa wrote: Did you read my post on carrier construction, where the move to always round up means you have top produce billion ISK ships in bulk and to get a pretty goob BPO will take 5 years instead of 3 months? Move to 100 steps only ta...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.10 14:30:00
|
47. Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM 9 Results! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Xenuria wrote: I just want to know one thing, how many votes did I get? Excel can't seem to open this document. I dream of a CSM that is not built up almost entirely of CFC candidates and their pets. you came in third to last the only peop...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.10 14:18:00
|
48. Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM 9 Results! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Darin Vanar wrote: Dinsdale for CSM! i would vote for dinsdale for csm as long as someone promised me video of the summits
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.09 22:34:00
|
49. Sticky:Dev blog: Researching, the Future - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Darin Vanar wrote: Math doesn't lie. It cannot be embellished with grandiose statements of importance. This patch is broken on arrival. That's just a fact from even a casual look at the numbers. the numbers show nothing of the sort, and stop...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.09 22:23:00
|
50. Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM 9 Results! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Mike Azariah wrote: Choosing candidates to vote for was easier. But some of the voters did not bother to choose at all, they voted as their bloc had predetermined. It is in THEIR best interest that other lesser blocs or other voters believe th...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.09 22:17:00
|
51. Sticky:Dev blog: Researching, the Future - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
how could anyone NOT think that was intutive, my gosh now, under this new system, I pay only 94% of each material, the bpo calls for 10 so that's 9.4 but i have to round that *goes crosseyed, falls over* god how could anyone have been expected ...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.09 22:09:00
|
52. Sticky:Dev blog: Researching, the Future - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
well lets see *pulls out paper, pencil* now lets set X = ME50 and Y=100 we are looking for better where Y =X*better so X = 10% * 1 / (1+50) Y = 10% * 1/(1+100) so 10% * 1/(1+100) = 10% * 1 / (1+50)*better so (1/51)*(10% * 1/(1+100))=10%*bet...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.09 22:08:00
|
53. Sticky:Dev blog: Researching, the Future - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
LHA Tarawa wrote: 1) Was waste = 10% * 1 / (1+ME) where ME is 0+ so complicated that it needed to be reworked into whole %s of waste? how much better is a ME100 bpo than a ME 50 BPO please give me an exact answer without reaching for a cal...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.09 22:03:00
|
54. Sticky:Dev blog: Researching, the Future - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
LHA Tarawa wrote: And we're back to a simple difference of opinion. All the material adjustments they are making in this release seem highly ill advised to me. the "opinion" that fire is hot and burns and the "opinion" that fire is wet and...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.09 21:52:00
|
55. Sticky:Dev blog: Researching, the Future - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
ElectronHerd Askulf wrote: Additionally, turning the crank on a naive implementation of this stuff leads me to the improbable situation of requiring 2 rifters to build 1 jaguar. This is based on Nullarbor's comments regarding having a 'ceil' p...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.09 21:29:00
|
56. Sticky:[Summer 2014] Calling for feedback on Assembly Line Settings - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Captain StringfellowHawk wrote: So what is happening with the skills that we got to Do Remote Research? i continue to train them so i can adjust jobs in our research station while i'm sitting in our factory station
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.09 21:27:00
|
57. Sticky:Dev blog: Researching, the Future - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Darin Vanar wrote: Weaselior wrote: that has exactly 7 states: if it's ME0, ME1, ME2, ME3, ME4, ME5-9, ME10+ I rest my case. I think you know enough to mis-represent my post, that the issue with "once the scripts run" is not in the d...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.09 21:23:00
|
58. Sticky:Dev blog: Researching, the Future - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
LHA Tarawa wrote: As for you point, my argument has always been to NOT go forward with the research changes. Therefore, in that case, waste will still exist, and can be calculated as waste = 10% / waste_divider, where waste_divider = old ME + ...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.09 21:21:00
|
59. Sticky:Dev Blog: CSM 9 Results! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Leeloo wrote: Freelancer117 wrote: Eligible voters have cast 31,294 votes for the CSM9, for CSM8 this number was 49,702 votes cast by eligible voters, and for CSM7 that was 59,109 votes cast by eligible voters...... CSM8 was by far th...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.09 21:15:00
|
60. Sticky:Dev blog: Researching, the Future - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Darin Vanar wrote: CCP, what is going on with the new ME? It seems you are scrambling to fix something but you are incorporating more issues. You are clearly running out of time and this isn't ready for release. If you run DB scripts in the cu...
- by Weaselior - at 2014.05.09 21:05:00
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |