Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 |
61. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Tippia Why? Not why, but with whom?! --
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.31 10:25:00
|
62. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Pottsey We do not have this perfectionism now. As I have been saying for a while the perfectionism in short simple definitions is impossible. Perfectionism is only possible in the longer complex definitions that are not prac...
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.31 10:16:00
|
63. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Tippia I've already answered this. So I ask again ... With you? --
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.31 10:06:00
|
64. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Whitehound on 31/05/2010 09:47:04 Originally by: Tippia The ones offering them perhaps? Perhaps with you? --
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.31 09:44:00
|
65. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Tippia So how about actually discussing the definitions offered? With whom? --
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.31 09:29:00
|
66. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Whitehound on 31/05/2010 08:28:51 Originally by: Pottsey Defining what the word tank is, is not something that is needed. It's a simple thing that current definitions work for. Like Tippia said "It's a way to increase how m...
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.31 08:24:00
|
67. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Tippia ... Tippia, I do not care at this point what you have to say. --
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.30 23:44:00
|
68. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Whitehound on 30/05/2010 23:15:54 Originally by: Pottsey ... When someone asks you "What is a tank?" you do not answer "Oh, it is complicated!" or "I show you one." You answer "It is a ship's ability to sustain damage." -...
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.30 23:11:00
|
69. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Pottsey That's a pretty poor why of defining tanking. You just defined it so 100% of original passive tanks are not classed as passive tanks but active tanks yet there is massive distinction between the tanks. Look there is ...
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.30 22:19:00
|
70. What level implants to purchase? - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Noh Hotaru The reason I'm continuing with the military line is that I have managed to pick up a single +1 perception implant... dunno if this is any kind of guarantee of what's to come though... They are random. And, yes,...
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.30 22:07:00
|
71. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Whitehound on 30/05/2010 20:47:15 Originally by: Tippia Disagreeing with you and demonstrating the gaps in your suggestion is not trolling. No, you did not demonstrate anything. One has to ask you. The point of a definiti...
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.30 20:45:00
|
72. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Tippia Why do you try to dismiss me rather than my suggested definition? I dismissed you together with your suggestion, because you are mostly trolling. I define an unfitted ship to have a tank, because I define a tank...
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.30 19:20:00
|
73. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Tippia Seeing as how your suggested definition cannot distinguish between the two, and is thus quite useless: no. No, you wrote an unfitted ship is tanked. Quote: It doesn't change my suggestion in the slightest. ...
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.30 17:41:00
|
74. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Tippia No. You can be fitted and still untanked; you can be unfitted and still tanked. So you agree. Quote: àwhich is why it's not a good distinguishing feature to build the definition of "tank" on. Thanks for t...
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.30 17:06:00
|
75. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Tippia Because the two states exist and have their uses, and as such need to be defined. Like fitted and unfitted, perhaps? Quote: HP, which certainly is a pre-requisite knowledge to be able to talk about tanking, ...
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.30 15:46:00
|
76. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Whitehound on 30/05/2010 14:44:16 Originally by: Tippia It is based on the assumption that all ships have a tank and therefore does not provide a distinction between tanked and untanked. Yes, all ships do have a tank, or ...
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.30 14:42:00
|
77. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Whitehound on 30/05/2010 13:10:12 Originally by: Tippia A very bad definition of what sets a "tank" apart from other attributes the ship has. Proposition 1.1 and its proof are false. Why? Quote: Incorrect use of th...
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.30 13:08:00
|
78. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Korlissa You're really reaching for stuff to argue about now aren't you? No, I am feeding you! You like being fed? Because there is no one but trolls around to discuss a sound definition for active and passive tankin...
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.30 11:53:00
|
79. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Korlissa They define well enough in context, but if you want to replace the word with something else, be my guest, it doesn't weaken my argument in the slightest. Your argument was made redundant by the creation of this t...
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.30 10:54:00
|
80. Active vs Passive - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Tippia they define them just fine, albeit in an abbreviated form. --
- by Whitehound - at 2010.05.30 09:09:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |