Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 [100] |
1981. I want my SP refunded - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lapine Davion wrote: Why would the OP need her SP refunded when her game literally hasn't changed and she still has all the same functionality that she had before? The only thing I can think of is that she was trying to contract scam with thos...
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 23:28:00
|
1982. I want my SP refunded - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: CCP reimbursed us with SPs after they had removed the learning skills. GǪbecause it represented training time lost to functionality that was no longer in the game. Nonsense. You could have easily lived wit...
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 23:23:00
|
1983. I want my SP refunded - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lapine Davion wrote: Haha, what. We got those SP refunded because they removed the Learning Skills. Why else would we have gotten them? "Haha what," exactly. You are dumb as a tree. The questions is why would you need these SPs or why would y...
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 23:18:00
|
1984. I want my SP refunded - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lapine Davion wrote: [Was the contracting system removed? Is the OP no longer able to make contracts? Are those people who bought titans still able to fly titans? The ships themselves haven't been removed have they? Then you don't get any SP re...
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 23:12:00
|
1985. I want my SP refunded - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: So why should they give you any SP back when nothing has been lost or removed? CCP reimbursed us with SPs after they had removed the learning skills. They did not have to do this back then either, because we did all get our attr...
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 23:05:00
|
1986. I want my SP refunded - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Your name worries me more than your problem.
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 22:40:00
|
1987. Forum lag - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The forum is trolling you back, Miilla. What goes round comes around.
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 20:44:00
|
1988. Proof Positive most players don't use the forms. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Serene Repose wrote: You mean beside the fact there's generally 25 to 30 thousand players on, and twenty to thirty regular forum posters? I am at least twice as smart as the average poster, so you can count me double.
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 19:00:00
|
1989. Another Hulkageddon Thread: Mining Safely - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What happened to staying docked and watching the prices climb?
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 18:58:00
|
1990. Proof Positive most players don't use the forms. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
MotherMoon wrote: Leeroy McJenkins wrote: Our squads have reported that the vast majority of those killed were exhibiting behavior to indicate that they were indeed bots. this really, thanks goons <3 Which in Goon terms means as much ...
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 18:39:00
|
1991. Proof Positive most players don't use the forms. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Whitehound wrote: What if ... What if miners simply stop caring about Hulkageddon and do not mind getting their ships blown up? This would be a massive and unthinkable blow to the egos of all gankers. Could this be pos...
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 18:06:00
|
1992. Proof Positive most players don't use the forms. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What if ... What if miners simply stop caring about Hulkageddon and do not mind getting their ships blown up? This would be a massive and unthinkable blow to the egos of all gankers. Could this be possible? No, it cannot be ...
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 17:50:00
|
1993. Forum signatures - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sable Moran wrote: There's a even lower limit to the visual crap eyes can tolerate. I would like to test this.
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 16:40:00
|
1994. Inferno And Datacores - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Has anyone yet said that having one, single and lazy form of farming might not be a bad idea? Having one form of lazy ISK-farming is good, because it adds diversity to a game. It is still only a game. It allows to have a single ISK-farming featur...
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 16:32:00
|
1995. How long does it take to - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Guns make a full cycle after they fired a shot, not before they fire.
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 16:02:00
|
1996. In high-sec space, you are never safe. Unless you have a -2.0 to 0 sec. standing. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Singulis Pacifica wrote: ... But the biggest complaint of the victims is that high-sec, the area that is introduced as the safest space in the game, is not really that safe at all. ... Another empty rant by an empty head and his empty view of...
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 15:47:00
|
1997. Forum signatures - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sable Moran wrote: What's the problem with text sigs? There is a limit to the crap one can read.
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 11:25:00
|
1998. lolock - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Biatch in bathrobe detected.
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 10:28:00
|
1999. Forum signatures - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The only good use signatures have is to distract from all the ship toasts. And that is not a bad use.
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 10:20:00
|
2000. Hulkageddon V: Unholy Union. 1000 dead miners. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: ... And i have one of my glorious hunches about Hulkageddon V: It's going to be the very reason why there will not be a Hulkageddon VI. It's too long, Helicity is too uninvolved, the Goons are overtaking it for one...
- by Whitehound - at 2012.05.07 08:35:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 [100] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |