| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
61. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: Yes, there is. The track you are running on, the finishing line you are crossing, the clock and the rules defining the victor are all part of the environment. GǪbut they're not the competition. Have you ev...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 16:00:44
|
62. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: You mean the ISKs that I got in exchange? No, I mean the wealth you lost. The ISKs make me wealthy. It is exactly what I wanted and what I got. You did not succeed in making me lose anything. So where do w...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 15:57:10
|
63. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: No. For example: We are both running the 100m race. There is absolutely zero PvE effect in this scenario. Yes, there is. The track you are running on, the finishing line you are crossing, the clock and the rules definin...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 15:46:22
|
64. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: Then, please, make me lose something. I do have market orders up. Then you are already competing with other players, and you've most likely lost something in the last 5 minutes. You mean the ISKs that I got...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 15:37:24
|
65. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Whitehound wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: "Losing stuff" is not a condition of PvP. Then what is? Player interacting against other players interests, competetively. No, because that is just as much the definition ...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 15:30:26
|
66. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: "Losing stuff" is not a condition of PvP. Then what is?
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 15:26:48
|
67. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: No. Another player can simply not make you lose items in trading. Sure they can. Then, please, make me lose something. I do have market orders up. Show me how you are going to make me lose my stuff.
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 15:22:34
|
68. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: Better explain to me how one can lose something that one never had to begin with. So your argument that it's not PvP is that if you don't compete, you can't lose what you're not committing to the competition?...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 15:08:19
|
69. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malt Zedong wrote: Ralph King-Griffin wrote: Hahaha, competitive PvE, that's cute. I'm pretty sure the hound is being deliberately obtuse and beligerantly misinformed to rile tippia up. At least I hope so because he's an idiot if I take th...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 14:55:23
|
70. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: No. You cannot make me lose a thing. Sure I can. I can make your buy orders fail, and your sales to either never happen or be done at a loss. Quote: You are suffering from the illusion that competing on t...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 14:42:53
|
71. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: This only describes competitive PvE. No it does not, for the simple reason that there is no GǣEGǥ in that interaction, and definitely not one that fills any kind of competitive function. You pay your fe...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 14:26:07
|
72. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: You do not cause anyone a loss by buying or selling items over the market. Yes you can. ... No. You cannot make me lose a thing. I dare you, if you disagree then please make me lose my space ship. You are...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 14:19:00
|
73. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: Whitehound wrote: ...Well, it is not. It is pep talk. CCP may only not want the traders to feel left out of the PvP game.... Semantics again. Player versus Player - means two players working against each other. S...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 14:12:31
|
74. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Market McSelling Alt wrote: HERE @19:45 CCP itself calls the healthy markets a "TRUE PVP COMPETITION" Just because you want to call it something else doesn't mean it isn't PVP. Well, it is not. It is pep talk. CCP may only not want the tr...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 12:42:23
|
75. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malt Zedong wrote: Tippia wrote: Malt Zedong wrote: There is no sandbox pve and pvp, sandbox is sandbox. Sure there is. The distinction you're actually making here is whether or not it is a multiplayer sandbox. Lets get semantic aga...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 12:05:38
|
76. Why even bother trying to fight anymore. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Eugene Kerner wrote: You are patheitc. So is your spelling!
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 09:35:46
|
77. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Then why has PLEX price risen, if there are now less accounts (multiplied per player) using isk to PLEX? One reason is of course that PLEX has always risen in value regardless of the number of active players, but with the...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.30 22:02:25
|
78. Should EVE Online be reset? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No. Doing the same thing again and expecting a different outcome would be insane. The game is a living, changing thing. If you are having regrets then do something different.
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.30 18:49:49
|
79. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rain6637 wrote: There are so many better things to do with ISK than sitting on high value per unit items like PLEX. Even if it goes to 2.2 Bil that's a 100% return but EVE will also be dead. We all try to kill EVE by what we do. And owning so...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.30 18:21:12
|
80. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Whitehound wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: It also doesnt need an economics degree, to understand that if isk PLEX buyers left the game, that supply and demand would dictate a reduction in PLEX price, as a factor of reduc...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.30 17:25:17
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |