Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 |
21. [Proposal] To make accusations of EULA violations a violation of its own - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: Whitehound wrote: what will happen when Goons make it a method to accuse players of EULA violations is that we then have a means to stop you. Or what would be the purpose of Goons going around and threatening to get playe...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.01.24 01:35:00
|
22. [Proposal] To make accusations of EULA violations a violation of its own - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Lykouleon wrote: Besides what Shah has already pointed out, consider the following: If we already troll with fake threats of EULA violation reports, what's going to happen when you make EULA violation threats petitionable? People are immediate...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.01.24 00:34:00
|
23. [Proposal] To make accusations of EULA violations a violation of its own - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: I reject your argument for the new rule based on your premise (that such a change is necessary to 'protect people's dignity'). No such protection is necessary because if someone has not done nothing wrong, they have nothing ...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.01.23 23:46:00
|
24. [Proposal] To make accusations of EULA violations a violation of its own - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: Oh. You're one of 'those' people. Yeah... discussion can't really progress beyond this point because you are clearly attempting to apply your own values to a game. Understand... you're on the internet sir. Take nothing...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.01.23 23:26:00
|
25. [Proposal] To make accusations of EULA violations a violation of its own - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: I highly doubt that CCP would ever find enough GMs to scrub and enforce what people say outside of the very worst examples. Like De'Veldrin said, it is a losing battle. ... Dignity is overrated. It makes you concerned about...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.01.23 22:42:00
|
26. [Proposal] To make accusations of EULA violations a violation of its own - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
De'Veldrin wrote: For the record I think you're fighting a losing battle. Why?
- by Whitehound - at 2013.01.23 18:20:00
|
27. [Proposal] To make accusations of EULA violations a violation of its own - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
De'Veldrin wrote: Is that an accurate summary of the problem you are proposing to solve with this thread? By no means. It s about protecting the dignity of the players further than before by forbidding accusations of EULA violations. Players ...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.01.23 18:04:00
|
28. [Proposal] To make accusations of EULA violations a violation of its own - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
De'Veldrin wrote: Is that about the size of your issue? Not sure what to respond here since my previous response was removed for being off topic by CCP Eterne, when I wrote "There is no size involved here." I still cannot see what size it is...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.01.23 17:16:00
|
29. [Proposal] To make accusations of EULA violations a violation of its own - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Alekseyev Karrde wrote: Sounds like a personal problem. In all fairness, know that I have reported you for off topic posting. I do this because I can and because the forum has got rules. See if you want to continue with it and what it then ge...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.01.23 16:40:00
|
30. [Proposal] To make accusations of EULA violations a violation of its own - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
De'Veldrin wrote: Is that about the size of your issue? There is no size involved here.
- by Whitehound - at 2013.01.23 14:38:00
|
31. [Proposal] To make accusations of EULA violations a violation of its own - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I am sure this proposal will not go down easily, but I believe it needs to be made and implemented at some point in the future. CCP seems to be getting better and better at chasing down botters and RMT. If we find any, and we have good reasons to...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.01.23 12:58:00
|
32. [CROWD SOUCRE] Who wants Micro Transactions removed from the game? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Bump. --
- by Whitehound - at 2011.06.29 11:30:00
|
33. [CROWD SOUCRE] Who wants Micro Transactions removed from the game? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Ninevite You're just mad you don't have a monocle No, I am not. --
- by Whitehound - at 2011.06.26 19:13:00
|
34. [CROWD SOUCRE] Who wants Micro Transactions removed from the game? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Whitehound on 26/06/2011 19:13:57 T'Amber has left out the option to remove it all together. So here you can vote if you want Micro Transactions removed altogether, and if the existing vanity items should be turned into actual game ...
- by Whitehound - at 2011.06.26 19:06:00
|
35. [CROWD SOURCE] Increase subscription fee as an alternative to MT - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
No. I pay enough as it is. If CCP wants more money then they shall cut down on their alcohol consumption. From what I always hear about Fanfest does there seem to be a lot of alcohol involved, which is supposedly very expensive in Iceland. So, h...
- by Whitehound - at 2011.06.24 19:18:00
|
36. [CROWD SOURCE] Microtransactions - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
No. --
- by Whitehound - at 2011.06.24 16:36:00
|
37. [issue] faction towers/POS modules - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Since you have mentioned it ... these are some extra big cookies. --
- by Whitehound - at 2011.06.07 20:06:00
|
38. [Proposal] Add new map filters to support miners - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Hello, the map knows many filters, all of which have a use to some if not all players. Mission runners can see where their next available agent is, PvPers can look for kills and cloning facilities, traders can look for player hot spots - only to ...
- by Whitehound - at 2011.04.07 19:33:00
|
39. [Proposal] Add a map filter to support miners, show the state of belts - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Bump for more support. --
- by Whitehound - at 2011.02.12 15:12:00
|
40. [Proposal] Moving stations closer to planets - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I support it only under the condition that some of the stations that are currently close to the lava planets are actually getting moved further away from them. Some of the stations are so close to lava planets that I doubt anyone would want to li...
- by Whitehound - at 2011.02.12 15:06:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |