Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
61. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: Please explain this in more detail. I would like to know more. I'm going to show you a neat trick GÇö one you should learn because it will help you in the future. It's called linking. https://forums.eveonl...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 15:52:44
|
62. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: So tell me, what is relevant to you and how do you proof it? What the active agents are. Please explain this in more detail. I would like to know more.
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 15:40:14
|
63. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dersen Lowery wrote: Assuming that I was a freighter pilot (I'm not) ... This puts you right into a space ship and you can certainly be targeted by others and suffer a great loss. Not only a loss over your ship but in case of courier contract...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 15:37:56
|
64. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: So winning and losing is irrelevant to yo, you see no point in having a competition and with that you concede the argument. Nope, nope, and nope. In that order. That's just some nonsensical strawman you've co...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 15:22:22
|
65. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: Then how do you prove that you have won? Again, repeating the question does not change the answer. So winning and losing is irrelevant to you, you see no point in having a competition and with that you conc...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 15:07:16
|
66. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Whitehound wrote: Meaningless marketing buzzwords All of the "PvE" activities in Eve are designed to pit you against other players, or to pit other players against each other. They are conflict drivers; ergo PvE a...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 15:03:43
|
67. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: And did you not just say that it was irrelevant? Nope. Then how do you prove that you have won?
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 14:45:27
|
68. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: When risks, losses and gains are irrelevant then what is the point of having a competition? To see who wins and who can then brag about being the best. Who is winning and who is losing? And did you not jus...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 14:35:53
|
69. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Irrelevant. Risk is no more a prerequisite than a loss is (unsurprisingly, when considering what GÇ£riskGÇ¥ is), and there most definitely can be a loser without loss. When risks, losses and gains are irrelevant then what is the...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 14:29:00
|
70. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: [Trading is primarily a PvP activity as you buy from or sell to players. This is where I actually disagree and say that it is still competitive PvE. You do give your items to a broker, and you do pay the broker and the stat...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 14:21:58
|
71. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: So you have no proof and claim proof is irrelevant? No. I'm saying that what you're trying to prove is irrelevant. ... So you have no proof, or are you saying loss is irrelevant? In any case, if you have ...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 13:59:11
|
72. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: Let us try a different approach: Is there any proof you could show me that your losses are real, not speculative and have been afflicted to you by another player? Still not different; still irrelevant. So y...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 12:21:47
|
73. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: Have you yet considered that your understanding of the market is perhaps only a derivation of the PvP around it and that the competitive PvE is a tool within a PvP game? No, because that would require me to ...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 12:10:03
|
74. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jill Xelitras wrote: Whitehound wrote: So who attacked my orders? And what is my loss? Can you tell? Let's assume you put a sell order. Whatever you're selling has a market value: the price that somebody else is willing to pay to get ...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 11:26:31
|
75. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: I still do not see an attack happening. I do not know who or if anyone is attacking me and I do not see any loss either. That's because, as you and others have satisfactorily demonstrated, you don't understan...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 10:48:53
|
76. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Whitehound wrote: --- Define the following three concisely: 1) PvE: 2) PvP: 3) Competetive PvE: This is not a rhetorical request. I expect actual answers. This is your final chance. Please do not spam. I alread...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 10:40:36
|
77. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Estevan Valladares wrote: Quote: You dont know because you never experienced it. That is so famous as a fallacy that it has a latin name: Ad verecundiam Edit: It was time to change the profile. That one had reached 100 posts. Oh pl...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 10:38:21
|
78. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Quote: But why is it now no longer relevant It never was. All that ever mattered was that it was another player, which it always is. So your own argument is irrelevant?!? I still do not see an attack happening. I do not kno...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 10:29:44
|
79. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: Sure loss is a factor. Nope. it's just a very common result since the competition is commonly a zero-sum game. Quote: So who attacked my orders? And what is my loss? Can you tell? Irrelevant. It's inhere...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 10:13:08
|
80. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Cancel Align NOW wrote: Tippia you are destroying Whitehound in this forum pvp. Yes, but that's because he doesn't understand words. He never did. It's a bit unfair, reallyGǪ I am sorry if you are having a fictional fight ...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.09.01 10:10:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |