Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
101. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Whitehound wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: "Losing stuff" is not a condition of PvP. Then what is? Player interacting against other players interests, competetively. No, because that is just as much the definition ...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 15:30:26
|
102. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: "Losing stuff" is not a condition of PvP. Then what is?
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 15:26:48
|
103. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: No. Another player can simply not make you lose items in trading. Sure they can. Then, please, make me lose something. I do have market orders up. Show me how you are going to make me lose my stuff.
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 15:22:34
|
104. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: Better explain to me how one can lose something that one never had to begin with. So your argument that it's not PvP is that if you don't compete, you can't lose what you're not committing to the competition?...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 15:08:19
|
105. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malt Zedong wrote: Ralph King-Griffin wrote: Hahaha, competitive PvE, that's cute. I'm pretty sure the hound is being deliberately obtuse and beligerantly misinformed to rile tippia up. At least I hope so because he's an idiot if I take th...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 14:55:23
|
106. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: No. You cannot make me lose a thing. Sure I can. I can make your buy orders fail, and your sales to either never happen or be done at a loss. Quote: You are suffering from the illusion that competing on t...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 14:42:53
|
107. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: This only describes competitive PvE. No it does not, for the simple reason that there is no GǣEGǥ in that interaction, and definitely not one that fills any kind of competitive function. You pay your fe...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 14:26:07
|
108. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Whitehound wrote: You do not cause anyone a loss by buying or selling items over the market. Yes you can. ... No. You cannot make me lose a thing. I dare you, if you disagree then please make me lose my space ship. You are...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 14:19:00
|
109. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: Whitehound wrote: ...Well, it is not. It is pep talk. CCP may only not want the traders to feel left out of the PvP game.... Semantics again. Player versus Player - means two players working against each other. S...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 14:12:31
|
110. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Market McSelling Alt wrote: HERE @19:45 CCP itself calls the healthy markets a "TRUE PVP COMPETITION" Just because you want to call it something else doesn't mean it isn't PVP. Well, it is not. It is pep talk. CCP may only not want the tr...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 12:42:23
|
111. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malt Zedong wrote: Tippia wrote: Malt Zedong wrote: There is no sandbox pve and pvp, sandbox is sandbox. Sure there is. The distinction you're actually making here is whether or not it is a multiplayer sandbox. Lets get semantic aga...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 12:05:38
|
112. Why even bother trying to fight anymore. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Eugene Kerner wrote: You are patheitc. So is your spelling!
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.31 09:35:46
|
113. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Then why has PLEX price risen, if there are now less accounts (multiplied per player) using isk to PLEX? One reason is of course that PLEX has always risen in value regardless of the number of active players, but with the...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.30 22:02:25
|
114. Should EVE Online be reset? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No. Doing the same thing again and expecting a different outcome would be insane. The game is a living, changing thing. If you are having regrets then do something different.
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.30 18:49:49
|
115. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rain6637 wrote: There are so many better things to do with ISK than sitting on high value per unit items like PLEX. Even if it goes to 2.2 Bil that's a 100% return but EVE will also be dead. We all try to kill EVE by what we do. And owning so...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.30 18:21:12
|
116. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Whitehound wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: It also doesnt need an economics degree, to understand that if isk PLEX buyers left the game, that supply and demand would dictate a reduction in PLEX price, as a factor of reduc...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.30 17:25:17
|
117. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Whitehound wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Whitehound wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: ... Explain to me, how a reduction in alts/training, (powered by isk PLEX), due to passing 1bil, would not systemically result in a ...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.30 16:44:07
|
118. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Whitehound wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: ... Explain to me, how a reduction in alts/training, (powered by isk PLEX), due to passing 1bil, would not systemically result in a huge reduction in PLEX demand? ... I just h...
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.30 15:44:03
|
119. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: ... Explain to me, how a reduction in alts/training, (powered by isk PLEX), due to passing 1bil, would not systemically result in a huge reduction in PLEX demand? ... I just have.
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.30 13:12:57
|
120. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: It also doesnt need an economics degree, to understand that if isk PLEX buyers left the game, that supply and demand would dictate a reduction in PLEX price, as a factor of reduced demand, rather than an increase as now. .....
- by Whitehound - at 2015.08.30 12:36:41
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |