Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 200 300 |
1781. Wardec v.s. Bot Miner Corp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: Whitehound wrote: You will not achieve any of your goals either by the corp not disbanding, but only staying docked and waiting for the war to run out. That's fine. In that event, it costs something to deny your attacker ...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 19:43:00
|
1782. War Dodge Clarification Needed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vin King wrote: What's a wardec? Better ask what's a war cry as this seems to have a new definition.
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 19:26:00
|
1783. War Dodge Clarification Needed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Adaahh Gee wrote: EI Digin wrote: Takseen wrote: If you could bypass CONCORD for a measly wardec fee there'd be precious little point to having them at all. CONCORD tries to protect you from everyone else who doesn't pay to wardec you....
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 14:51:00
|
1784. War Dodge Clarification Needed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Karle Tabot wrote: I respectfully suggest that those sincerely interested in truly fun and rewarding pvp in this game begin focusing on how that might be so implimented, promoted and encouraged, as to appeal to more than merely those seeking to...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 14:45:00
|
1785. War should follow players. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Another missed opportunity for a thread in Features and Ideas Discussion . On the topic: Corporations leaving alliances will take the war with them. 0Lona 0ltor wrote: Why is dodging concord bannable but dodging a war is deemed acceptable? ...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 13:39:00
|
1786. Wardec v.s. Bot Miner Corp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natsett Amuinn wrote: Whitehound wrote: Natsett Amuinn wrote: The problem is one industrial corporations ability to use a wardec in the place where the bulk of all industry occurs, to limit the ability of another industrial corporation to...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 12:54:00
|
1787. Wardec v.s. Bot Miner Corp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natsett Amuinn wrote: The problem is one industrial corporations ability to use a wardec in the place where the bulk of all industry occurs, to limit the ability of another industrial corporation to outperform them. Please, tell me what is it...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 12:47:00
|
1788. Wardec v.s. Bot Miner Corp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natsett Amuinn wrote: Whitehound appears to be a member of a small group of people who think that the only pvp in high sec should be ganking. Instead of people going to war with each other and having reasons to fight, he'd rather the only peo...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 12:22:00
|
1789. CCP stands for... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Causes Childish Problems
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 09:59:00
|
1790. Pansy Alert - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frankly, Araknen seems to enjoy the game more than OP does.
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 09:44:00
|
1791. Wardec v.s. Bot Miner Corp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Aren Madigan wrote: Couldn't really tell you if there's an EVE example, haven't seen enough, but the point still stands. Anyways, you may not have said its full proof evidence, but this whole conversation started because someone else did, which...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 09:24:00
|
1792. Wardec v.s. Bot Miner Corp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
TheGunslinger42 wrote: Except the corp instantly dropping and reforming isn't a "win" for the aggressor. There are no goals I can think of that an aggressor may have in which that would be considered a "win". If they want gudfites? Not a win, a...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 09:14:00
|
1793. Wardec v.s. Bot Miner Corp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Aren Madigan wrote: It used to be popular to believe the world was flat. They were wrong. They could not accept the idea of the Earth being a ball, just like you cannot accept popularity as a measure.
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 05:17:00
|
1794. Wardec v.s. Bot Miner Corp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Aren Madigan wrote: What... in the holy ****... ok... you're just trolling, blocked. Hey, this is unfair!! I paid CONCORD. You should not be able to block me. Bla bla bla. Amidoinitrite?
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 05:07:00
|
1795. Wardec v.s. Bot Miner Corp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Aren Madigan wrote: Its not absolute evidence though. For example. Say a corp of 1000 joined and all on a whim decided, "hey, we're going to be a Gallente only corporation" and they start off ONLY flying Gallente ships. That's a population shif...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 05:00:00
|
1796. Wardec v.s. Bot Miner Corp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Aren Madigan wrote: ...It wasn't one of the most popular classes. In fact, far from it. However it had an ability that was so powerful, so ridiculous, despite not seeming as such at a glance, that when people started discovering it, it was rapi...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 04:20:00
|
1797. Wardec v.s. Bot Miner Corp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Aren Madigan wrote: Not how it works at all. You called it is a sign. I call it evidence. Is your sign suddenly gone or why are you giving me nonsense?
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 04:12:00
|
1798. Wardec v.s. Bot Miner Corp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Aren Madigan wrote: Because generally its a sign ... You mean it is the evidence of the problem and without it would you not have a problem. Welcome to my world! In EVE is almost everything designed to be unfair and gives an advantage or a d...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 03:23:00
|
1799. Wardec v.s. Bot Miner Corp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Benny Ohu wrote: Lin Suizei wrote: Whitehound wrote: In case you have not read it, James 315 uses it himself. Check his corp history. You will love supporting him! Have you ever considered that this is, perhaps, for comedic value, and ...
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 02:42:00
|
1800. Wardec v.s. Bot Miner Corp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lin Suizei wrote: Let's modify that scenario a little, ... No, I was not asking you. It was meant for Aren Madigan, who has got a strong belief in fairness. I do not think you posses such a belief.
- by Whitehound - at 2013.03.01 01:29:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 200 300 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |