| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
VolatileVoid wrote: X Gallentius wrote: Would you guys all please unsub now and get it over with so CCP can move forward and away from "Sov Rent Online"? If you would have provided content instead of "blue donut online" none of this would ha...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.10 15:17:15
|
2. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Nyphur I've read your stuff over the years about making the game less artificial and more immersive. I thought you would suggest something different. Suggestion 1: Instead of random anomalies appearing in space, CCP should allow 0.0 XXX structur...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.10 15:04:34
|
3. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Would you guys all please unsub now and get it over with so CCP can move forward and away from "Sov Rent Online"? If you would have provided content instead of "blue donut online" none of this would have happened. Your bad I guess.
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.10 14:35:25
|
4. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Emmy Mnemonic wrote: CCP wants to generate conflicts and they think that ratting in nullsec is the "driver" for conflicts. I think they are severly misstaken! CCP should tie in the R64 moons in the sov-equation, because they represent the leas...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.08 16:30:33
|
5. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
1 bil/month, 700 bill in losses for entire alliance, 700 billion/ 700 active pvp'ers / 11k man alliance = 1 bil. What's the problem again?
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.08 01:56:58
|
6. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alp Khan wrote: X Gallentius wrote: Alp Khan wrote: [So, could you tell me how 51M ISK per hour on an account through anomaly bounties is an extravagant amount of income? One can make almost two times this figure running L4 missions in hi...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.08 01:32:50
|
7. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alp Khan wrote: [So, could you tell me how 51M ISK per hour on an account through anomaly bounties is an extravagant amount of income? One can make almost two times this figure running L4 missions in high-sec! Such poverty out there in 0.0. H...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.07 20:30:15
|
8. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Eli Apol wrote: It's very limited annoyance for the defender if he's locally based in the first place. No one can base locally. That's the part everyone seems to be forgetting. You're not maximizing income and ...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.05 19:41:40
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
In the end, the defenders will assign the boring tasks of Sov defense to their alts - like always.
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.05 16:41:07
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Shorten range of module to 75 km so that a reasonably spec'd anti-interceptor Destroyer can engage. Interceptor immunity gone. No T2 module in game increases performance by a factor of 10. This module shouldn't be the first. I have a feeling the ...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.05 16:09:53
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: You don't have to. Eventually they will just not appear, so you take the sov without a fight, just a bunch of interceptors and a can-do attitude. (Numbers helps with both of these) Whaaa!!!??? You mean people will give...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.04 22:49:28
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ereilian wrote: Ultimately this is a griefers system, small groups of disaffected or bitter-vet(tm) can mess around with sov in unused systems but when it comes down to it they will not have the stamina or numbers to plex their way to victory. ...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.04 21:56:13
|
13. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Torsnk wrote: Just some ideas to make Sov a -real thing- that actually has some significance. The ideas are limitless.... The UN doesn't collect revenue nor enforce laws, the sovereign entity does.
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.04 21:48:13
|
14. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Off TZ members can still attack/defend POS/POCOs, and they can harass farmers - maybe to the point where holding a station no longer has value.
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.04 20:15:55
|
15. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rain6637 wrote: Renters are paying for the stability and protection. And like Arrendis said, there's an element of value at play. 10 billion ISK a month is worth different things to different people. And here I thought 0.0 was full of risk....
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.04 16:11:11
|
16. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jacus Noir wrote: hmm "Prime Time" goes a bit like this, Alliance mail goes out reading: CTA Everyone! Structures are going vulnerable in 1 hour, drop what you are doing, come hug the station and defend the system from attack...btw we get to d...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.03 20:50:00
|
17. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lena Lazair wrote: Even if they get it completely wrong the first time around, it will shake things up and ..... lead to more pew until they iterate on it. Change is good. Proven to lead to more pew until ruthless optimization takes hold.
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.03 18:21:59
|
18. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tiberian Deci wrote: Quote: How is this different than properly stronting a timer, or a POCO timer? Defender picks his advantageous time, and everybody adjusts accordingly. BECAUSE OMG IT'S DIFFERENT AND HARD AND CCP ARE KILLING MY PLAYS...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.03 18:16:31
|
19. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
xartin wrote: gment the nullsec playerbase as entire major regions of eve's active timezones will be excluded from participating in content. Think from the perspective of an attacker wanting to capture alliance held space that is only vulnerab...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.03 18:11:06
|
20. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
SilentAsTheGrave wrote: Tiberian Deci wrote: Will notifications go out like they do now? Will the entire alliance get a mail that something of theirs is under attack so they can dispatch a fleet to go defend it? Or will it get RF'd and then ...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.03 17:25:13
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |