| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
581. Nano's aren't the problem, Stasis webifiers ARE! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The post has been reported. - Support fixing the UI | Suggest Jita fixes | Compact logs
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.24 20:03:00
|
582. The EVE universe is getting a reset!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The post has been reported. - Support fixing the UI | Suggest Jita fixes | Compact logs
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.24 20:02:00
|
583. 45Bill lost in war against lag! Who says traders are care bears! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The best part is, the user interface could have easily saved your ass. But it didn't. When you're modifying a market order, it's just a text box with a string of numbers. No formatting to make it obvious at a glance the scale of the number. Most ...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.24 19:59:00
|
584. Why nano everything? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Hastur DragonTooth You haven't been paying attention. Nobody is saying people want nano boats to be as slow as an AF. We are saying, that if you nurf nanos then HAC/Recon will be as rare and as useful as an AF. Precisely. ...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.24 15:39:00
|
585. Why nano everything? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Alpha Prime I don't care how you setup your ship, how many bilions in implants you've got in your head. No ship not specifically build for speed should NOT got past 5km/s. Interceptors, yes. No cruiser, not even****abon...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.24 15:29:00
|
586. Most popular cap ship - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Felix Dzerzhinsky The reason the Thanatos is popular is because it has both a remote armor and remote shield transfer range bonus while sporting a decent tank of its own. The fighter bonus is nice too if you are in a situati...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.24 03:51:00
|
587. Why nano everything? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Gypsio III Originally by: Xaenoob Quite astonishingly stupid stuff pure flames TL;DR - Support fixing the UI | Suggest Jita fixes | Compact logs
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.24 03:38:00
|
588. Why nano everything? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: *****zilla By the time the pilot learns (experience) to fly a ceptor well they'll probably be ready for the hac. So you say it doesn't take many skills to go from one to the other, then when I prove that you're wrong, you ...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.23 22:14:00
|
589. Why nano everything? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Tenuo Edited by: Tenuo on 23/06/2008 21:33:26 Garmon instructed me to post because he thinks you guys suck for not being able to kill nano ships. here goes: http://killboard.heretic-nation.com/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=239...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.23 21:41:00
|
590. Why nano everything? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: *****zilla Originally by: Xaen You argue that nanos aren't guerrilla warfare and thus are somehow invalid, but imply that it would be cool if they were, I point out that they are and so you change your point comple...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.23 21:37:00
|
591. Why nano everything? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Bronson Hughes Just train up Cruiser V and medium T2 weapons and you should be able to hop straight into a nano-HAC skill-wise. Mind you, that's not exactly a short train, but if all of the support skills are there already f...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.23 21:14:00
|
592. Vagabond vs Inty... Not overpowered? yeah right. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: NoNah So you take the interceptor that's supposed to be slow but deal good damage, put 33% propulsion modules on it, four times more on the vaga that's supposed to be fast and live by it...? In a way it's like saying Amarr ...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.23 21:11:00
|
593. Vagabond vs Inty... Not overpowered? yeah right. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Boz Well Conclusion: NERF NANO RAVENS! lmfao - Support fixing the UI | Suggest Jita fixes | Compact logs
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.23 21:09:00
|
594. Vagabond vs Inty... Not overpowered? yeah right. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: FORD ESC0RT garbage lol @ putting the slowest interceptor up against the fastest (speed bonused!) HAC, fitting the HAC for speed, the interceptor for tank, and then comparing their speed. Way to shoot yourself in the fo...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.23 21:07:00
|
595. Why nano everything? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Lord WarATron Warp Core stabaliser, Jump Drive, Logging off etc etc. People can come up with anything to avoid defeat and call it a "Counter". A ECM is no more a counter than a WCS. A dampner is no more a counter than a Jum...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.23 21:00:00
|
596. Why nano everything? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: *****zilla stupidity You argue that nanos aren't guerrilla warfare and thus are somehow invalid, but imply that it would be cool if they were, I point out that they are and so you change your point completely. ...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.23 20:55:00
|
597. Why nano everything? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Gypsio III Originally by: Xaen It's that every change the propose completely destroys all usefulness of heavy assault ships utterly. It's this kind of stupidity that wrecks any chance of any sensible discussion o...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.23 20:45:00
|
598. Why nano everything? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Originally by: Xaen Originally by: Italian Wedding I urge you to give me the name of an interceptor (I will train every skill to 5 and spend 20bil isk for this said ceptor) that can mwd into a...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.23 20:37:00
|
599. Why nano everything? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: *****zilla Edited by: *****zilla on 23/06/2008 19:23:12 Originally by: Xaen Get a covops to give you a warp-in on the nano gang. Drop your whole god damn 50 man battleship fleet right in their laps. Last I ch...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.23 20:33:00
|
600. Why nano everything? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: *****zilla Originally by: Bronson Hughes If you strike where the enemy is not, you have nothing to strike at. Guerilla warefare is about striking where the enemy cannot strike back so you maximize your inflicted dama...
- by Xaen - at 2008.06.23 20:13:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |