Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. How would you define a "carebear"? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Carebears are cartoon teddy bears from the 80s with rainbows on their chest, known for caring about others. As such it's actually a terribly inaccurate term to describe those generally labeled as such in MMOs. Those being as Tippia most closely id...
- by Xorv - at 2012.08.13 20:41:00
|
2. Two more accounts unsubbed. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jupiter's ****! reading some of the replies in this thread, what a bunch of petty lamers some of you are! .. was going to type more on EVE, but really it isn't even worth it.. I just think " Inferno " and Mors Sanctitatis see you in Planetside...
- by Xorv - at 2012.08.07 09:51:00
|
3. why give mining barges a ridiculous boost and not tighten restrictions on -10s i... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
clamslayer wrote: wtf CCP, why make ships ungankable when the real issue is freedom of -10s in high sec? Miners are being ganked indiscriminately because: -10 can fly around high sec in destroyers with out being stopped at gates. -10s should...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.30 23:24:00
|
4. Off Gride Command Bonuses Please don't nerf them. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
MotherMoon wrote: Just introduce off grid boosters. The catch being to.boost off grid, you have to enter a Seige type mode. That would be a reasonable alternative to on-grid only boosting. I would add that near unprobability should also go....
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.29 01:23:00
|
5. Off Gride Command Bonuses Please don't nerf them. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Whar Target wrote: I can't imagine the number of lost subscriptions any on-grid booster nerf would result in. Go ahead, whine and troll me for saying it, but it's the truth and CCP knows it. It would also be another buff to blob warfare and a...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.28 19:59:00
|
6. Fake wardecs / Griefing wars - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What's the TL:DR of the OP? Nerf solo PvPers so that players in a "1000 man alliance" that are unable to defend themselves against a single player can make hordes of risk free ISK running Highsec Incursions? Wow, that's a whole new level of lame...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.26 00:26:00
|
7. Self-destructing your ship should not give you insurance money - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Another +1 for removing Insurance entirely, but especially in the case of Self Destruct. Further more regarding Self Destruct, make it a means for people to potentially capture ships. * As soon as you activate SD, your pod is ejected from the s...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.25 20:04:00
|
8. Grows some balls. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Corina Jarr wrote: You don't understand. You won't ever get carebears, or partial carebears, to enter a free PvP zone. They will learn that they can be probed down and killed without knowing anyone is there, and they will either leave the gam...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.22 04:40:00
|
9. Grows some balls. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
FireT wrote: Just my opinion: but if you force almost everyone out of high sec you would kill Eve. The sandbox idea DOES include casual game play in high sec where you can chat with your friends and corpmates. It's not about forcing everyon...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.21 08:58:00
|
10. Is CrimeWatch vaporware? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Herr Wilkus wrote: TLDR; Crimewatch = more suicide ganking, as 'suspect' players take the path of least resistance. Isn't there plans for mining ships with bigger buffer tanks in exchange for lower yields? And it's not like mission ships et...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.19 01:50:00
|
11. Is CrimeWatch vaporware? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
War Kitten wrote: If there are no absolute right and wrong actions, then there should be no hisec at all, nor any Concord. Instead, CCP chose to implement laws in hisec to protect law abiding citizens, and defined certain absolute wrong acti...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.18 19:43:00
|
12. Grows some balls. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
FireT wrote: Edit: on a serious note. Why can't people think beyond their nose? Seriously, EVERY MMO has sa[f]e spots. Unlike most MMOs you can lose everything in Eve. So some people do not wish for that and simply enjoy the game their way and...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.18 19:20:00
|
13. Pay to win - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mallak Azaria wrote: General comment directed at multiple people, but here you go: Xorv wrote: * The DAoC example someone else used is a good one. 'Buff bots' became prevalent in that game for exactly the same reason they are becoming so h...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.17 20:56:00
|
14. Pay to win - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Xorv wrote: Is putting gold ammo on the NEX store that can be placed on the in game market by the player that purchased it with real money 'pay to win' or not? It is, but for a rather complicated reason. [...] What I really...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.17 20:39:00
|
15. Pay to win - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Xorv wrote: So, essentially what you're saying is that CCP can put gold ammo in the NEX store, and so long as there's an option for players that buy it that allows them to sell the gold ammo for ISK in game it would not be 'pay...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.17 19:40:00
|
16. Pay to win - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Khanh'rhh wrote: EpicFailTroll wrote: So, as facts would have it, it's P2W, since, just like gold ammo, it increases your chances to win Except, gold ammo can only be acquired by paying money for it, and in EvE everything can be acquired f...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.17 19:31:00
|
17. Is CrimeWatch vaporware? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tysinger wrote: Everyone, go play DayZ where there is no pve and the person that developed it says **** YOU to pve'rs. [...] CCP wise up or you will lose the rest of all your old player base, hope you can fill it with more WoW players to make u...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.17 08:24:00
|
18. Pay to win - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mallak Azaria wrote: A boosting alt is an advantage, but it's not an advantage that guarantees a win most of the time. Therefore it is not pay to win, it's pay to have a second account. I wasn't aware that guaranteed win was required for so...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.17 08:06:00
|
19. Pay to win - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Corina Jarr wrote: Everything I said was 100% correct. ISK provides only indirect advantages. All PLEX does is provide a mild shortcut to ISK (I was not counting its use as game time because that in and of itself is not an advantage, as regul...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.17 01:24:00
|
20. Pay to win - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Corina Jarr wrote: Multiple accounts are not pay to win because those accounts can be free . End of arguments. Corina Jarr wrote: I understand PLEX perfectly fine. PLEX is not pay to win because ISK itself provides no direct advantag...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.16 20:59:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |