Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 |
21. How's going the war mechanics changes? it's been debated? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
None ofthe Above wrote: You seriously think my proposal is a themepark ride? Or you just like to bash everything new and different. Yes, it moves clearly in that direction. ..and No, I advocate lots of new things and changes to EVE on these ...
- by Xorv - at 2012.04.18 06:11:00
|
22. How's going the war mechanics changes? it's been debated? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Scrapyard Bob wrote: So what do you fight over in hi-sec? [...] None ofthe Above wrote: Actually what he is searching for is a victory condition for the defenders. Also a way to encourage the aggressors to actually log in on the accou...
- by Xorv - at 2012.04.18 00:54:00
|
23. How's going the war mechanics changes? it's been debated? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
roboto212 wrote: shameless plea for people to read my thread about modifications to the new war dec system Unfortunately I already did that.
- by Xorv - at 2012.04.17 06:18:00
|
24. How's going the war mechanics changes? it's been debated? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: make wardecs next to free and completely unavoidable by getting rid of decshields and npc corps, noob stomping will go away while the highsec wardec corps go after the real isk pinatas. problem solved Yup it's all ...
- by Xorv - at 2012.04.17 04:25:00
|
25. How's going the war mechanics changes? it's been debated? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: I am more in the line of finding you and breaking your knees. Is that an endorsement of non consensual PvP in any future WiS expansion?
- by Xorv - at 2012.04.12 20:52:00
|
26. A conversation I wish I had a long time ago.... - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I'm not sure how you went from someone I thought would represent Malcanis' High Sec Manifesto on the CSM to someone defending Incursions, but I sure am glad I didn't vote for you now.
- by Xorv - at 2012.03.19 19:57:00
|
27. Alekseyev Karrde for CSM7: War and Sov that Works for Everyone - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
You don't hate ponies? How do I retract my vote?
- by Xorv - at 2012.03.17 08:09:00
|
28. Alekseyev Karrde for CSM7: War and Sov that Works for Everyone - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
You'll be an expert on internet radio interviews by the end of this Alekseyev, How many have you done now? Big contrast to some other candidates that hardly communicate at all, at least not in any meaningful way... I couldn't even tell you the pla...
- by Xorv - at 2012.03.08 09:07:00
|
29. CSM7 Vote Match! is now live! - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Skye I'm not sure the value of such data, as candidates positions are not clearly defined by how they respond in terms of agree or disagree. For example take a question on an issue like Local Chat Intel. It was worded to mean removal from the enti...
- by Xorv - at 2012.03.05 09:56:00
|
30. CSM7 Vote Match! is now live! - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I took a look at this and have to agree with others the questions were in many cases very poor and in some cases clearly biased. This is not a good tool to use to figure out who you should vote for in the next CSM election. Fortunately, many of t...
- by Xorv - at 2012.03.04 21:52:00
|
31. Alekseyev Karrde for CSM7: War and Sov that Works for Everyone - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Alekseyev Karrde wrote: What I will say is that any change needs to be careful not to overreach and break guerrilla warfare, solo play, or just make it way too damn easy for cloaks to be found. I think a slight change can be made to balance the...
- by Xorv - at 2012.03.03 22:07:00
|
32. Alekseyev Karrde for CSM7: War and Sov that Works for Everyone - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: The fact that piracy takes place in high sec is not the fault of the pirates GÇô it is the fault of broken risk / reward balancing. By moving more of the lucrative activity into low sec we can continue to support a heal...
- by Xorv - at 2012.02.19 02:02:00
|
33. Alekseyev Karrde for CSM7: War and Sov that Works for Everyone - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: Wait, what?? I was hoping you could elaborate on what you mean by this. I've never said PvP should be opt-in or consensual in any way, shape or form. I've argued for giving players more tools to enact their own justi...
- by Xorv - at 2012.02.18 06:55:00
|
34. Alekseyev Karrde for CSM7: War and Sov that Works for Everyone - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Anyone that had your support Endeavour would be by default a terrible candidate IMO, so that's another plus for Alekseyev. Endeavour Starfleet wrote: Incursions are FINALLY the real counter to nullsec CTAs and of course because of that the ca...
- by Xorv - at 2012.02.18 04:13:00
|
35. Alekseyev Karrde for CSM7: War and Sov that Works for Everyone - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I hope your contacting every Pirate, Merc, and High Sec PvP corp to vote for you, because none of the other remaining High and Low Sec candidates are going to be good representatives for them on the CSM, and you're going to need a lot of support t...
- by Xorv - at 2012.02.17 10:30:00
|
36. Alekseyev Karrde for CSM7: War and Sov that Works for Everyone - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Couple of broad questions for you Alekseyev: What are your thoughts on Incursions, particularly in High Sec? What are your thoughts on Player interactions with NPCs, such as making player standings more meaningful, relating to docking rights, Po...
- by Xorv - at 2012.02.16 08:48:00
|
37. Iam Widdershins - CSM7 candidacy - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Iam Widdershins wrote: They should go back and revisit it, making it less safe again, but making sure that everyone knows how and why things can happen. Ah I see what you mean, yes that makes sense.
- by Xorv - at 2012.02.14 20:29:00
|
38. Iam Widdershins - CSM7 candidacy - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Pinky Feldman wrote: The last thing you want is people losing their blinged out Incursion ships for months due to unwanted game mechanics from a war dec change. Actually, it's not the first thing I want, but it's definitely up there. One t...
- by Xorv - at 2012.02.14 07:46:00
|
39. Iam Widdershins - CSM7 candidacy - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Thanks for the answers. I was a little surprised by some. Just to clarify.. Other than some adjustment to lower the payout on Vanguards, you're largely supportive of High Sec Incursions as they are now? You wouldn't support removal of Incursions...
- by Xorv - at 2012.02.13 00:41:00
|
40. Iam Widdershins - CSM7 candidacy - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Thoughts on High Sec Incursions? Local chat Intel/cloak detection? Use of off grid booster alts? NPC corps as a means of avoiding Wardecs? Have you read Malcanis's High Sec Manifesto? What are your opinions?
- by Xorv - at 2012.02.12 22:16:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |