Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
61. Bring back L5 missions to high-sec, please! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Baron Deathicon wrote: As a player, I should be able to run any mission level (1-5), in the security band (high/low/null-sec) of my choice. No, you should not be able to. Risk vs Reward
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.02 19:28:00
|
62. [Proposal] New form of Delayed Local for Known Space. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Sarah Schneider wrote: Regardless, i'm not fully against the idea. The purpose of it, is nice, the solution offered however, imo might need another alternative. While it seemed balanced, people might view it as a complete nerf of local while n...
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.02 19:25:00
|
63. [Proposal] Remove Local Channel - Iteration #999999 - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
What exactly are your ideas for DScan, assuming Local Chat lost it's Intel function?
- by Xorv - at 2012.07.02 18:53:00
|
64. [Proposal] Remove T3 Strategic Crusiers From High Sec - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
No, just remove CONCORD from most of High Sec.
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.29 00:11:00
|
65. THE ARENA - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Colonel Xaven wrote: Tyranis Marcus wrote: Yes, people go apeshit about ideas like this, because they see it as somehow being a threat to their own playstyle. Screw 'em. An arena would be pretty awesome. It's not a threat to any playstly...
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.28 09:45:00
|
66. Just say no to Arenas! - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Gevlin wrote: remember a sandbox is all about OPTIONS you can make your own game. No. Your understanding of what a sandox is in relation to MMORPGs is fundamentally wrong. It is not about presenting players with loads of set options they ca...
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.27 06:33:00
|
67. Cloaking (Mechanics) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Solution to AFK cloaking is removing Local Chat Intel.
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.27 00:32:00
|
68. So, whats next? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: There will be some things in the minutes that touch upon your questions. R Well tell everyone to hurry up and finish the minutes! Personally I hope those ship skins (the various faction ones) come with a standings re...
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.26 21:42:00
|
69. Just say no to Arenas! - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
mxzf wrote: Xorv wrote: Or they could actually provide an honest service and end up as a Chribba meets Batiatus mix and gain lots of ISK and EVE fame. Of course, that would be the best solution. I was just pointing out that a player cr...
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.26 06:12:00
|
70. Just say no to Arenas! - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
mxzf wrote: Kaelie Onren wrote: But they can't agree on Prizes for the winner, costs for the loser, rules of engagement, modules allowed, etc. This would be a good improvement. Then a player should step up and offer to be a third-party j...
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.26 05:25:00
|
71. [Proposal] - Blood Raider Incursions & Deadlier Incursions - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Terranid Meester wrote: Why should Sansha have all the fun? Sansha have fun being farmed constantly? If CCP can transform Incursions into events with uncertain outcomes, meaningful consequences, where the Pirates can actually win, and where...
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.24 19:34:00
|
72. Blood Raider Incursions & Deadlier Incursions - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'm all for Pirate Incursions so long as unbeatable CONCORD isn't involved, players can side with the Pirates, and if there's something real to be lost should the Pirates win.. permanent security drop for the system for example. But no more terr...
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.24 19:25:00
|
73. You really want to "revitalize null", "boost low"... then ba... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I agree that gates are a crappy game mechanic. In terms of changes I would like to see without having to rely on CCP having to do too much work... Increase the point at which a ship jump into a new system from a gate from ~15K to randomly 15-150K...
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.23 21:08:00
|
74. Just say no to Arenas! - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I was listening to a podcast with CSM Selene talking about his recent trip to Iceland and one of the things he mentioned was CCP having the tools to create PvP arenas in EVE, and this being something CCP was considering for the future. Such conte...
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.23 19:47:00
|
75. CSM 8: Xenuria Rising - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Xenuria is "rising" and making videos, that doesn't sound good. There's a reason there's a warning on external links ladies and gents, what has been seen cannot be unseen. Be wary!
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.23 19:37:00
|
76. Goons 4x4ing through the Sandbox - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I don't really get the claims that it's Goons vs the Sandbox. It's really CCP themselves that are biggest threat to EVE as a Sandbox. Goons just like to **** in other's sand pits and knock over their sandcastles, but I've never seen Goons as anti ...
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.22 23:45:00
|
77. This is a forum, I wish to use it as such. Debate away.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Captain Fandango wrote: Either ccp have to get involved and attempt to, frantically, appease opposing factions wants, needs and demands, or they have to maintain distance and let players shape content, we can't all cry out to them for help and ...
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.21 23:31:00
|
78. Are we safe in bad ways? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Whole thing just seems needlessly complicated. Just do the following instead: 1) Move all non newbie PvE out of the protection of CONCORD. 2) Make Bounties a physical item that must be transported to the relevant NPC Faction to be traded in for...
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.21 23:17:00
|
79. Go ahead CCP, listen to the people in the "make null virbant again" th... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Edit: some examples of engineered content: make incursion communities get "badges" of some kind for their outstanding effort defending the empire[...] Badges? Seriously? Incursions have never been about defending Empir...
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.21 08:47:00
|
80. Making nullsec vibrant again - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Flex Carter wrote: A really good post lost on deaf ears.... Such a shame really... (but I would like to reserve the right to quote you m8...) Why would you want to quote something born of ignorance. It reeks of someone who's mind is stuck...
- by Xorv - at 2012.06.21 07:42:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |