Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
41. STOP CLOSING EVE WITH SISI PATCHES AUTOMATICALLY - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Yih This is a limitation on Windows Task Manager. The install script closes any process called ExeFile.exe. As it can not access any data from within that process (courtesy of windows process security), nor see the filesyst...
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.24 06:23:00
|
42. CCP, stop being stupid with the pirate detection array upgrade - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: ep1k I bet you they will be the exact same come patch day. Thats always a possibility. Fw mission started out to be even worse than a waste of time and now they are a lulz easy to farm cash cow so give ccp a chance to twea...
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.24 06:10:00
|
43. Factional Warfare missions changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Apparently fw missions have been removed from sisi sparking much panic and speculation from the players currently farming fw lp for as long as they can stay awake at the keyboard. Those of us who already have our lp reserves are interested in the ...
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.24 05:40:00
|
44. Change Hel's bonus ... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
They should change the rr bonus into a npc station docking bonus. Originally by: CCP Casqade The forum does not represent anywhere close to 90% of the users. In fact it represents a clear minority of them.
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.24 05:00:00
|
45. CCP, stop being stupid with the pirate detection array upgrade - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: ep1k Originally by: Zeba Something else to keep in mind about the current numbers on sisi is that ccp probably intentionally altered the rates to keep testers from getting to much of an upper hand in inside informati...
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.24 04:49:00
|
46. CCP, stop being stupid with the pirate detection array upgrade - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Something else to keep in mind about the current numbers on sisi is that ccp probably intentionally altered the rates to keep testers from getting to much of an upper hand in inside information much like they scramble all the good moon goo positio...
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.24 04:15:00
|
47. Why is the Naglfar being nerfed CCP? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: BanMeAgainPlz They've gone into full stealth "we don't give a **** mode" and are going to do whatever they want regardless of what the playerbase says. I'm not really aware of ccp ever operating in any other fashion. Yes t...
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.24 03:00:00
|
48. CCP, stop being stupid with the pirate detection array upgrade - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Moon Kitten I wouldn't want anyone to plan and prepare their move to 0.0 in vain. If you really think the groups that are going to try for a slice of nullsec are doing it for the potential income then I'm sorry to say thin...
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.24 02:50:00
|
49. CCP, stop being stupid with the pirate detection array upgrade - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Tbh I don't think ccp wants all of your alliance leaving empire yet as the servers won't be able to handle the strain so what we will get is a trickle of players hanging in nullsec running the new stuff building up the rates whilst the majority of...
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.24 02:19:00
|
50. What will ccp put in on patch day we dont know about - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Peryner Originally by: Overlord Anubis Edited by: Overlord Anubis on 23/11/2009 21:41:47 Originally by: CCP Casqade Here is where I think we went wrong. And I mean this in a respectful manner. You tried...
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.24 02:09:00
|
51. FW Missions Gone? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah We need to look at the big picture and not our personal interests. I agree that the missions in their old form are not worth it, hence I lobbied strongly for reducing the standing penalty and rake up the rew...
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.24 02:04:00
|
52. What will ccp put in on patch day we dont know about - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: MADDOGzors God why am I not surprised. Here I'll break it down for you. Tier 3: rokh, abaddon, hyperion, maelstrom Tier 3 navy bs: put the word navy in front of the ships listed above Tech 2 or 3 version of tier 3: raven=g...
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.23 19:26:00
|
53. What will ccp put in on patch day we dont know about - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Zeba on 23/11/2009 19:14:29 Originally by: CCP Casqade Since people seem to be missing the point of this thread. This is my last reply to it. Originally by: MADDOGzors Since you actually reply, when do we get tier 3...
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.23 19:14:00
|
54. Did they kill the CNR? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: HeliosGal surprised u would be How about nobody who wants to make better isk an hour than spamming level 2 missions uses a fof cruise cnr.
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.23 03:49:00
|
55. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Zeba on 21/11/2009 04:10:13 Originally by: Letifer Deus lol @ unsticky'ing this thread SC changes have been axed for this expansion so why further confuse the masses with it still being stickied?
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.21 04:10:00
|
56. Rapier / Huginn / Hyena need a bonus to webstrength! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Muthafreakin Signed. When a triple web mounted on a t2 specialized ewar ship with a webber based role bonus is still not enough to make your target slower than the ship with the webber based role bonus something is not quite right.
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.20 11:06:00
|
57. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD TURN OFF THOSE WARNING SOUNDS - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
In before the SC zerg.
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.20 08:58:00
|
58. Artillery vs Tachyons - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It will be interesting to see how the new arty works on an apoc. Alas none of my characters can use large t2 projectiles so I can't test it out on sisi.
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.19 06:27:00
|
59. EWAR Bombs in FD-MLJ - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Let's see. 100 isk bombs with no restrictions on use would mean noone would get a consistant lock at any ffa from all the bomber spam kiddies who currently use falcons to disrupt fights or get revenge on the rring bs blob sitting at zero.
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.18 22:57:00
|
60. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Even though I agree(!) with murderone's analysis about the new sc I'm still getting at least two maybe three if they can dock for my fw alts just so I'm not a victim when everyone else has one. Let the docking games of doom begin..
- by Zeba - at 2009.11.18 22:09:00
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |