Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
781. EVE IPH Version 2.0 - Now with less Access DB and More Mining! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Agi Ronuken wrote: I'm testing the beta 3.0 and, apart occasional crashes not very frequent, i also see the base tab resetting to Branch / 1IX-C0 when i hit calculate. For Base tab i mean the one in the center of the manifacturing window, wher...
- by Zifrian - at 2014.11.09 12:54:16
|
782. Phoebe 1.0 SDE is out. - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Anyone looking into all the ids after ID: 34267 issue? They all have different blueprintTypeIDs as Desmond M reported.
- by Zifrian - at 2014.11.09 01:20:07
|
783. New book from xkcd comic creator - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Thought some fellow players would enjoy this. Looks like a fun read, especially if you like physics. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/04/science/randall-munroe-the-creator-of-xkcd-explains-complexity-through-absurdity.html
- by Zifrian - at 2014.11.05 13:06:44
|
784. EVE IPH Version 2.0 - Now with less Access DB and More Mining! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Cyrus Ildemar wrote: Been playing with version 3.0 -- so far awesome job!!!! love it as much as i loved the old one one question though: can tengus be produced in advanced medium ship assembly arrays?? All my reading has told me the answer is...
- by Zifrian - at 2014.11.05 12:54:18
|
785. EVE IPH Version 2.0 - Now with less Access DB and More Mining! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Oxide Ammar wrote: I'm having difficulty to adjust the window size IPH and it is affecting the manufacturing list window especially the section that you adjust the facility type and its region and system. I can't see the bottom row of the butto...
- by Zifrian - at 2014.11.03 12:08:05
|
786. Sticky:Dev blog: Invention updates in Phoebe - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Good stuff. Thank you for the update.
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.31 00:42:25
|
787. EVE IPH Version 2.0 - Now with less Access DB and More Mining! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Seraphina Amaranth wrote: Zifrian Where I am now is that I'm working through all the posts here and evemails I get. I consolidate that and put it in this file: [url=http://pastebin.com/cHDi63yC wrote: http://pastebin.com/cHDi63yC[/url] to tr...
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.30 14:45:54
|
788. EVE IPH Version 2.0 - Now with less Access DB and More Mining! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Elena Thiesant wrote: Zifrian wrote: I consolidate that and put it in this file: http://pastebin.com/edit.php?i=cHDi63yC to track issues and to allow people to see what bugs I've said I've fixed and those outstanding. Hi Zifrian That ...
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.30 10:09:58
|
789. EVE IPH Version 2.0 - Now with less Access DB and More Mining! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quick update: Thanks everyone for their input and bug reports. I didn't really plan this update out too well (actually I had not intended on providing a test version when I did - people just found it lol) so there are still a lot of things that I ...
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.30 02:17:55
|
790. EVE IPH Version 2.0 - Now with less Access DB and More Mining! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Kahawa Oban wrote: Under reactions the raw material requirements for Terahertz Metamaterials and Photonic Metamaterials is partially incorrect. For each one component is listed as 1 unit instead of 100. Also a question, when looking at T2 ship...
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.23 02:53:01
|
791. EVE IPH Version 2.0 - Now with less Access DB and More Mining! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Vexed Nova wrote: Zifrian wrote: Based on what you posted, this is probably the issue. Statin facilities is a table I create after loading all the data from crest. All those errors you got at the beginning are probably crest related (they l...
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.22 18:04:25
|
792. EVE IPH Version 2.0 - Now with less Access DB and More Mining! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Biomass MeNOW wrote: Naoko Kobayashi wrote: Just run the new test version 3.0. Already very stable and reliable from what I can tell. Will start using it for my T1 production planning again :) Latest I can find is 2.3.5269.31895 - where c...
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.22 17:23:19
|
793. Sticky:Dev blog: Upcoming Forum changes - Phase 1 of 2 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Nice work. Really like the changes. One thing I miss though is the box for dev blogs. I would always hit that when looking at the forums. Am I missing its new location? There were some other links there I also liked that are gone.
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.21 23:31:48
|
794. Sticky:Dev blog: Industry Changes for Phoebe - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
CCP Nullarbor wrote: probag Bear wrote: Echoing the question(s) about Phoebe's "Adding multiple outcomes to Invention" I assume the multiple outcome probabilities will be reflected in the SDE, or will happen according to some general for...
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.20 10:41:21
|
795. EVE IPH Version 2.0 - Now with less Access DB and More Mining! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Clifton Oksaras wrote: Didn't want to let this thread go abadoned for two weeks, so I'll just ask, how is everything coming? Majority of the stuff is done but a few things left to do. I'll get a test versioning out soon so people can double c...
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.16 16:47:23
|
796. Sticky:Dev blog: Lighting the invention bulb - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Apparently this so going live. Any info on suggested changes in this thread?
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.10 22:42:00
|
797. Sticky:Dev blog: Coming to EVE Online in the Phoebe release on November... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Are the invention changes going in as explained in the dev blog? There were a bit of suggestions to change a few things there that we never heard back on.
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.10 22:38:00
|
798. Sticky:[Phoebe] Long Distance Travel Changes - updates! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: Zifrian wrote: Can someone explain to me why jump freighters and rorquals jump ranges limit "force projection"? I just don't get why they are part of these changes at all. We've specifically avoided using the term "f...
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.10 16:21:00
|
799. Thread about cloaky threads - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Daichi Yamato wrote: No they post with more rationale. Rather than the people who open these threads who think its unfair for a player to do little more than sit in local. No one was ever killed by a cloaked afk player. Sitting afk in space is...
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.10 16:10:00
|
800. When is it worth it to move to null? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I'm in null ands yeah, no bubbles and no sov fees are much more attractive. Null industry is mainly capital production in my experience.
- by Zifrian - at 2014.10.10 15:49:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |