Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
21. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
JC Mieyli wrote: Uriam Khanid wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: These look like they will out tank and out DPS even CSs . a small correction seems more of a problem with hacs than t3s and cses balancing to the lowest denominator just...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.20 10:33:53
|
22. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Chan'aar wrote: Loki Core systems seem to have a missmatch. The PG one (Augmented Nuclear Reactor) has a 20% role bonus to PG output. The CPU one (Dissolution Sequencer) has NO bonus to cpu output ? This does not seem right to me and makes...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.19 11:35:34
|
23. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I'm worried recons are going to be obsolete.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.19 10:48:43
|
24. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Mhari Dson wrote: Would also need a reduction in depot space cost and something added for about half a fit worth of modules, plus ammo 450m3 with the current depot should be enough room assuming the subsystems are 10m3.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.14 01:42:19
|
25. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Noxisia Arkana wrote: Dior Ambraelle wrote: The last one is actually a good point, T3Cs should be able to refit themselves for a completely different role. Not including the option where you have a DST following you with everything you may n...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.13 18:33:06
|
26. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cpt WhiteEye wrote: So what did actually change: I lost 1500 dps on my Hel Before patch it took me around 4 minutes to finish a Combat site. After path it takes me 4 minutes to finish the same site. CCP NEVER USED A SUPER FOR RATTING AND THEY ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.13 17:31:55
|
27. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Mary Timeshift Jane wrote: baltec1 wrote: You can very easily operate 2-3 supers/carriers using this system. OK, proven. You don't have supercarrier and have no clue what you're talking about. You just made a fool of yourself in front of...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.13 11:58:43
|
28. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Destriouth Hollow wrote: Such tools will get your account banned however (: CCP banned input broadcasting, they did not ban multiple clients on one screen.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.13 11:56:19
|
29. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Destriouth Hollow wrote: 1) That guy is using stratioses and not carriers Doesn't matter, its the tool he is using we are looking at not the ships. Destriouth Hollow wrote: 2) Microing 3 squads of fighters is the same work as microing...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.13 10:34:26
|
30. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Axhind wrote: baltec1 wrote: Axhind wrote: Show us this multiboxing of carriers then (no input broadcasting obviously) and just how long can you keep it up manually. Here you go. Granted its incursions but the same tactic will wor...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.13 10:29:44
|
31. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Axhind wrote: Destriouth Hollow wrote: [quote=baltec1] Nope the statics will be much more evenly for all the reasons I listed. The average capital-ratter rats more per month . I expect FAR more than 6,2% of all nullsec-ano-ticks be generated...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.13 10:07:30
|
32. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Destriouth Hollow wrote: Nope the statics will be much more evenly for all the reasons I listed. The average capital-ratter rats more per month . I expect FAR more than 6,2% of all nullsec-ano-ticks be generated by caps. FAR MORE. Disgusti...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.13 10:05:59
|
33. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Destriouth Hollow wrote: Destriouth Hollow wrote: CCP Larrikin wrote: The Data: LetGÇÖs set the stage for the decision by taking sample of 5 days in June. During that timeframe 10.6 Trillion ISK was rewarded in bounties. Of that: 22...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.13 09:58:12
|
34. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Mhari Dson wrote: With the state of medium missile weaponry bieng poor at best over the last five years, this really shouldn't even be an argument. They are reworking all mods this summer.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.13 08:50:13
|
35. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Analius Glover wrote: I'm still not satisfied with this changes because it has nothing to do with rebalancing but rather penalyzing. The best solution that was mentioned before would be introducing fatigue like timer/counter which will reduce b...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.13 08:40:33
|
36. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
ottomans proud wrote: Instead of nerf the fighter nerf the player who rat all day. It is not fait for those player who has only 1-2 hour for ratting. You can think about the limitation for each player for ratting a day for example first 2 ho...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.13 08:23:24
|
37. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Johnathan Hubble wrote: they didn't say that here they should have and honestly they want us to see their side they need to show all the facts not just part. i mean rough figures is this going to get them their desired changes or will it help...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.12 23:19:35
|
38. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Stevo patriot wrote: so i know im late to the party but heres my two cents. ive seen your concorde battleship gets a bounty & payout bonus based on sec status... if as the data suggests supers are taking a disproportionate part of the b...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.12 23:14:28
|
39. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Johnathan Hubble wrote: Could you show all data for the mots popular ratting ships including the rattle the machariel ishtar etc? also clarify what they mean by T1cruiser are VNIs included? this data set doesn't tell us enough to make a real o...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.12 23:03:39
|
40. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Beast of Revelations wrote: I don't get the mentality and sentiment. You want big fat multi-billion ISK super-ships which are only good for, and only used for, PvE? That's exactly what is happening now. Beast of Revelations wrote: If...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.12 22:33:20
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |