Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
41. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Marcel Garsk wrote: baltec1 wrote: This is simply rage at money making machines getting a nerf, we have seen this **** before. Did CCP **** up? Yes. I have seen this coming from day one of the carrier changes which is why I didn't bother to ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.12 22:15:34
|
42. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: Bronson Hughes wrote: Dior Ambraelle wrote: Among the Caldari cruisers, only the Navy Caracal, Eagle and Onyx have no drone bays. The Zealot (Amarr), Phobos (Gallente) and Broadsword (Minmatar) also lacks drones. Int...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.12 22:10:51
|
43. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
singthegrief wrote: As i was one of the people who lost his **** over the changes, i do think this was a good call on your part to "nerf your nerf". That being said it doesn't change how i feel. I have spent years and tons or real money and isk...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.12 22:03:56
|
44. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Jed Airtech wrote: sabastyian wrote: [quote] Currently in June; 1749 Vnis have been lost for 191.66b 270 Carriers have been lost for 683.73b 34 supers have been lost for nearly 1.1T If you are going to focus on numbers why don't we focus on ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.12 21:50:46
|
45. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Akrasjel Lanate wrote: CCP Larrikin wrote: This is primarily due to NPC Bounties. This trend is unsustainable. Having such a large ISK faucet is bad for the economy, and this ISK faucet is concentrated to a relatively small number of play...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.12 14:48:06
|
46. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
RKJakTup wrote: not really, i see what your trying to say but they can do it where you cant use caps to do some type of end game just by adding gates. and they can drop supcap mods to bring up the value of subcaps in pve and isk gathering. wi...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.12 14:44:24
|
47. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Kaze Mester wrote: Well, this happens when you don't give new end content to players for years, more and more challenging stuff in every x period of time. (How other games do.) Giving more end content makes you fly more expensive ships, risk ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.12 09:54:20
|
48. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
M3tamorph wrote: Is CCP really ignoring all this posts and will not give a flying "panda" about the players and their opinions? It's obvious that this will be worst change CCP already forced their paying customers... are we still going forward...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.12 09:23:13
|
49. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Bromum Atom wrote: Carriers ans supercarriers war greatly boosted during last year. This update with increased sig and mass of t3 and next increasement cost of pirate BS will boost carriers to. And now you told about t3 should be nerfed greatl...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.09 10:39:46
|
50. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
zbaaca wrote: jump freights . Probably a fair argument, citadels have made getting them around virtually risk free. zbaaca wrote: ceptors to ignore 95% of camps . To do so they have to be incredibly fragile which balances it out. ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.09 09:50:05
|
51. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Frostys Virpio wrote: Jeremiah Saken wrote: T3C are and will be special (like overpriced, and SP loss) that's why they get special abilities. They aren't that expensive if you consider what you get out of them. See this is why I wan...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.08 14:54:50
|
52. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Bromum Atom wrote: baltec1 wrote: So you should be able to just ignore someones defences? Sounds like you wan't an I win button. I told that. Dont know what you hear. You want camp gate killing t3 with you "win" button, but carriels still...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.08 14:54:02
|
53. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Bromum Atom wrote: Why they should get free killmail? Its only free if you let them win. Bromum Atom wrote: Or why I should logoff at camped system? You don't, you have a cov ops cloak, use it. Bromum Atom wrote: Why carrie...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.08 13:37:56
|
54. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Bromum Atom wrote: Why gate campers should be boosted? Ususally they dont want to pvp, they can only camp the gate and run when you start pew-pew with them. Why should you be able to ignore them?
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.08 12:18:34
|
55. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Omnathious Deninard wrote: With the expected nerfs to align time and sig resolution, nullification without cloak is probably a 100% chance of getting caught at a bubble camp. Sig increase isn't going to do much for catching them. You can clo...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.08 09:09:45
|
56. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Jeremiah Saken wrote: Bronson Hughes wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: In the current iteration of the subsystems the nullified sub has one less slot, and the covert ops sub has less raw hp. In order to maintain exploration viability they...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.07 21:31:40
|
57. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
zbaaca wrote: baltec1 wrote: Few things in my book that need addressing.. so you want to bring down ehp of t3 to t2 , meaning wh dudes will suffer , meaning to increasing cost , meaning basically removal of t3 from the field If you want...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.07 12:12:27
|
58. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Few things in my book that need addressing. Powergrid is way too high for a cruiser, for example. Proteus 1820 Thorax 1025 Exequror Navy Isuue 1038 Deimos 1313 Vigilant 1313 Talos 1375 Astarte 1688 A lot of the issues around T3C come from thi...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.07 10:48:25
|
59. Sticky:[June] Nullsec Asteroid Cluster and Excavator Drone changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Minty Aroma wrote: This is a horrible change - EU TZ players will just mine out everything so US TZ players won't be able to mine... That's what you get for being a 3rd world nation.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.02 17:46:57
|
60. Sticky:Forming the Strategic Cruiser Focus Group - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I'd like to sign up to toss my pennies around on these ships. I have experience with T3C from the dark days of the super drake (tengu from drakefleet days) right up to today's AHAC fleets. Flown with them in both large and small fleets and in a r...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.23 17:53:44
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |