Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
181. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: baltec1 wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: Remiel Pollard wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: By CCPs ******** definition of PvP WoW, Everqueat and Hello Kitty are all PvP then, at least in non-instanced areas. Not ev...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.31 06:13:25
|
182. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: Remiel Pollard wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: By CCPs ******** definition of PvP WoW, Everqueat and Hello Kitty are all PvP then, at least in non-instanced areas. Not even close, because that's not CCP's definiti...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.31 05:49:09
|
183. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dom Arkaral wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Many pirates are ex-miners. Why do you think? And before you ask, no I don't mine... I'd rather punch myself in the balls repeatedly until they're numb or non-existent than to subject myself to tha...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.30 13:41:48
|
184. Burned Out, What Now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sonya Corvinus wrote: 52 hours in a week? What jobs do y'all have in real life where you can get away with that? I pull those hours at work
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.26 21:14:57
|
185. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
March rabbit wrote: Well, if you look at it this way.... Don't you think that balance risk (totally player controlled) and rewards (totally NPC controlled) is somehow complicated? For example give your value of change to high-sec rewards an...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.16 12:28:11
|
186. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: baltec1 wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: baltec1 wrote: This is pretty much the problem. Highsec has been buffed in terms of reward while the risks have been greatly reduced. Nerfs are needed to bring back some sort of ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.15 11:32:39
|
187. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: baltec1 wrote: This is pretty much the problem. Highsec has been buffed in terms of reward while the risks have been greatly reduced. Nerfs are needed to bring back some sort of balance simply because buffing everywhere ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.15 09:12:14
|
188. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
March rabbit wrote: baltec1 wrote: Simple fact here is most people in highsec have no reason to go to low sec because highsec gives them better rewards for near zero effort and risk. This is what is hurting the game as a whole. Moving highs...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.14 17:46:26
|
189. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
DeMichael Crimson wrote: Lan Wang wrote: Are you too scared to go to losec without concord?, it's about "fixing" lower, not turning it into highec, doesn't do anything for game apart from cater to higher carebears Despite the fact that you...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.14 09:48:43
|
190. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bringing back faction warfare raids into highsec would be nice. Problem with lowsec is the things it needs are mostly addressed with nerfs to highsec income Possibly making lowsec the only place you can get some minerals from, noticeable improve...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.10 11:03:41
|
191. Is transport too easy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: baltec1 argues this hurts new players. It does not, as the tax is applied only to delivery packages, not to moving your own stuff. The alliances will simply adapt already used out of game tools to get around this. Malc...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.10 10:05:24
|
192. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Veyreuth wrote: The majority of defenders won't attack a citadel, but there's a few that might under the right circumstances. The point is to expose the attacker more if they're camping an NPC station. There have been a lot of nerfs, buff...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.09 20:41:27
|
193. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Veyreuth wrote: Might blocking an aggressing corporation/alliance from docking at an NPC station for the duration of a war be part of a solution? That would increase their risk. That would give defending corporations/alliances a reason to fight...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.09 20:31:13
|
194. Is transport too easy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: baltec1 wrote: And most use a JF to bypass gates entirely when supplying null and low. You plan doesn't work on the big boys and the organised. Its nuts how you present that as a good thing, as somekind of justificatio...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.09 20:22:40
|
195. Is transport too easy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: It makes hauling of contracts, more expensive the further it reaches in HS. That doesn't make it harder, just more expensive Salvos Rhoska wrote: Its like you didnt read the thread. How close are you to Jita? How ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.09 19:19:05
|
196. Is transport too easy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Or entrust a hauler with your cargo directly, paid before or after. Before meaning you carry the risk, and after meanining the hauler carries the risk. So your change does nothing to make hauling harder and can be avoi...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.09 18:55:14
|
197. Is transport too easy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: OP, these posters are afraid of the obvious. They want to wreck this thread, rather than engage its topic. Pointing out problems with your plan isn't wrecking the topic. I'm game for talking about making hauling less e...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.09 18:51:02
|
198. Is transport too easy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: baltec1 wrote: Snip No. if its your own property, or given to you. it costs you nothing. It its someone else's packaged goods as a contract delivery in your hold it is cargo taxed as a % of the delivery packaged value...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.09 18:38:19
|
199. Is transport too easy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: So? These are the out of game tools you meant? Wtf does that have to do with a systemic 0.1-0.5% delivery cargo value tax per HS gate? So if I have this right, me moving my **** via gate will incur a charge based upo...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.09 17:42:33
|
200. Is transport too easy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Sounds a bit iffy, but if you dont break the rules or laws, go ahead. Can you be more specific? Internal alliance shipping can be done via a simple forum post listing prices, not much changes aside from people paying t...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.09 13:20:40
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |