Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
381. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: They're not pocket battleships. As I've demonstrated they are in line with HP of battle cruisers , interdiction cruisers and some of the heavy assault cruisers and command ships which are also cruisers . You'd have to nerf...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.13 09:22:11
|
382. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: The reason nobody is flying them is because there is no T3C emergency and there is no need to have 150k ehp cruisers to counter your fantasy of the T3C emergency. We dont want 130k ehp cruisers to counter T3C we want T3C to...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.12 23:09:01
|
383. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: 600 dps. It fields 5 med drones. That get left behind with the first tactical warp. Steffles wrote: Heres 3 more for you. Damnation - 190k ehp (more than both your Prot and Battleship), 240k ehp if you add a links ...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.12 21:12:58
|
384. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: 575 Prot vs 609 Brutix - It has more dps. 480 for the brutix. Steffles wrote: Brutix can fit both rails AND blasters. There is a reason why nobody used med blasters in large fleet actions. Steffles wrote: The Pr...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.12 19:19:18
|
385. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: Has more dps. 100 less DPS. Steffles wrote: Its slightly slower but given the web twice as fast in web range. With a tracking disruptor in close your Proteus is hitting for half the damage its hitting for, at mid ra...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.12 17:12:42
|
386. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: So cheaper than the T3, more dps, twice as much cargo, 30k less tank but 224 armor reps x number of ships in fleet, discounting any logi. Has utiliity for web (fitted) or tracking disruptor, damps etc etc, better range, slight...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.11 10:42:13
|
387. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lan Wang wrote: its not really cheaper though, if you die you're adding an injector on top of that. Who bothers with that? You generally have the time between these fights to get that skill back. We still have a cruiser that thinks its a ...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.10 11:14:47
|
388. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: Show me a T3C that doesn't use oversized modules that is overpowered. I'd be interested to see one. [Megathron, Baltec Fleet] Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Damage Control II Imperial Navy 1600mm Steel Plates Imperial Navy 1...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.10 11:01:46
|
389. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lan Wang wrote: im seeing less and less t3c fleets going around these days... The breakup of the old empires means a lot have moved around and money has been more tight. Now that people are getting settled expect them to come back. They ha...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.09 09:42:38
|
390. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Spoken like someone who doesn't fly battleships. Now lets look at the meta out there. If you want a battleship fleet you turn to T3C because they are faster, tank more, get better tracking and a so forth. People are not using battleships not bec...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.09 09:35:58
|
391. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: Except it is balanced without oversized mods. I didn't use any and still got more tank, a bit more firepower, better tracking, half the sig, 3x the speed and cap stability.
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.08 19:52:32
|
392. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: As for the T3C = too stronk, its rubbish. They're fine, as stated earlier with evidence which you failed to respond to, its the oversized modules that shouldn't be fit to smaller ships that are being fit to smaller ships, causi...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.08 17:13:42
|
393. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cara Forelli wrote: Lan Wang wrote: Memphis Baas wrote: Wanda Fayne wrote: Pick a battleship. I will fit and fly that battleship. Meet me in space with ANYTHING you choose to fly. This scenario hides one of the major reasons why...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.08 17:00:03
|
394. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Memphis Baas wrote: I don't disagree about T3C's, but this is a battleships thread. They are the reason so many complain about battleships. The ideas always wind up being to buff battleships to ever higher levels to beat the T3C, power cr...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.07 19:37:47
|
395. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Memphis Baas wrote: Just want to point out that if we feel the need to nerf a whole bunch of other ships just to make battleships viable, then it's probably easier and better to just buff the battleships. People like their ships, and nerfing T...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.07 17:10:11
|
396. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Those are not the fleet comp T3C we are talking about here.
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.07 10:05:07
|
397. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: Beast of Revelations wrote: baltec1 wrote: There is a lot of misinformation here from people who seem to think battleships should be some sort of I win card. Just because someone doesn't think battleships are in the rig...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.07 09:30:41
|
398. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Avaelica Kuershin wrote: Beast of Revelations wrote: If not that, then I see no reason to keep the name 'battleship' if it doesn't match up with anything in a historical context, so the other option could be to change the name to something ...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.07 07:33:18
|
399. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
There is a lot of misinformation here from people who seem to think battleships should be some sort of I win card. As someone who has spent great deal of time in these hulls I can safely say that battleships are more than able to get around quickl...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.07 07:18:50
|
400. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Only problem with battleships is the pilots trying to fly them.
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.06 17:00:06
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |