Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
41. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Cade Windstalker wrote: Snip 1) SP loss: The SP loss itself is the same for everyone. Replacing it with injectors is currently less efficient for older players, than newer. If SP loss is removed, this disparity is a...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.09 08:56:40
|
42. PI clickfest is physically dangerous - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nicolai Serkanner wrote: guigui lechat wrote: Julanna Egnald wrote: Just as an aside, I was thinking that if the PI UI is painful, then DOTAs and RTS's must be out of the question, at least any kind of serious gameplay I dont click on ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.08 18:50:51
|
43. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Continued... ^ TLDR: -SP loss is a core mechanic on T3Cs that offsets the practical value of versatility from refitting subsystems. SP loss was put in to try to justify T3C power. Remove that power and you have no exc...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.08 13:58:03
|
44. PI clickfest is physically dangerous - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You click more in any FPS or RTS game.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.08 10:57:18
|
45. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: Once again restricting their use of BS sized modules removes around 30% of their total HP. In the case of your friends super tanked legion it removes more than 100k ehp. There is absolutely no reason to complete remake th...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.08 10:29:39
|
46. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: They don't have 50% more HP than other ships that's a lie. Our AHAC proteus with just subsystems fitted. 23,2k EHP Deimos, 13.2k EHP Ishtar 11.9k EHP Twice the base tank of an ishtar, close to twice the tank of a ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.07 11:45:14
|
47. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: Large ship modules cannot be fit to T3 cruisers. End of story. Yep its totally the oversized mods and not the fact that the proteus we use is getting 500 more powergrid than its nearest cruiser rival (several hund...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.06 11:23:31
|
48. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jeremiah Saken wrote: Cade Windstalker wrote: Also CCP have flatly stated, repeatedly, that T3 ships are supposed to be roughly equivalent to Navy Faction in terms of performance but more flexible. Quote that, because from fanfest presenta...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.03 22:34:54
|
49. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: Currently T3 are not OP but hey if they must be changed they should be changed to something worthwhile to fly. The only thing OP about T3 (and all the other OP ships like Orthrus etc) is the fitting of BS sized mods whic...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.03 19:09:54
|
50. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Egsise wrote: how about the amount of bling T3 cruisers are used with. Hull+subs+rigs is 300mil, then we use on average 500mil for the modules. It's the only way because there's no alternative. Battleship dps and ehp with 800mil but no insuran...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.02 23:27:11
|
51. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Egsise wrote: But they can't travel, it's a bit of a drawback They can travel, that's how invasions happen.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.01 21:03:19
|
52. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Egsise wrote: Correct, I threw some ridiculous ideas to the air. But as you pointed out the conditions don't forget that if you nerf the T3 cruisers you nerf the best ship in wormholes. T3 cruisers are our battleships capitals supers and ti...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.01 20:44:08
|
53. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: 1) If they dont have super carriers, that is their own issue for lack of isk/sp to field them. It has nothing to do with super carrier balance. How wealthy someone is, or how much SP they have, is not relevant to balance...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.01 17:17:04
|
54. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Beast of Revelations wrote: So the question you should be asking him is, why does he not want to INCREASE SP loss instead of doing away with it altogether? I think his answer is, it's a bad mechanic for numerous reasons, and if the ship gets ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.01 09:45:52
|
55. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: 1) Wrong. SP loss and cost as is, has demonstrably not locked anyone out of T3Cs. Larger/experienced alliances benefit from Keepstars and Titans too. You are missapplying Malcanis Law. The SP loss/cost is the same for ev...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.01 09:35:38
|
56. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: 1) Its not Malcanis Law. That NS entities have the isk/SP to build and field Keepstar/Titans does not make them unfair to less wealthy/experienced players. How much money you or I have is not relevant to balance. Neither...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.01 08:58:06
|
57. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: 1) How much money you or I have is not relevant to balance. The cost is the same for everyone. How much SP you have, or how rarely you use T3Cs, is again not relevant to balance. The loss and duration of recouping the loss...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.01 08:17:08
|
58. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: 1) SP loss matters. Removing it just makes T3Cs more attractive, not less. All it does is punish the less well off and low skilled. Most of the people who use these have the means to pay their way past it. We also on a...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.01 07:43:35
|
59. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: baltec1 wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: The answer to that is in the quote. It isn't. Under your plan there would be no point in using a T2 cruiser because it would be less capable than a t3c at its specialised role...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.01 07:02:39
|
60. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: The answer to that is in the quote. It isn't. Under your plan there would be no point in using a T2 cruiser because it would be less capable than a t3c at its specialised role.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.30 17:02:22
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |