Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
81. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: 1) Is it even possible to reduce the cost of a T3C and subsystems to a 40-50mil cost? Wont that utterly wreck the market? Why punish manufacturers/material sourcers? Who would even buy the POS ships your changes make of T3...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 15:41:14
|
82. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: 6) So a post-change T3C, with tank/dps between T1 and specialised cruisers, would have to carry a mobile depot, subsystems AND rigs inorder to be less effective than a specialised cruiser? Is that correct? If it's as good as the spec...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 14:27:58
|
83. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: 1) 40-50mil. Jesus... That will wreck the T3C market. Is that for just the hull, or including subsystems? Including. It's a fair price to pay. Quote: 2) There isnt much space between T1s and specialised cruisers. ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 14:20:11
|
84. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: 1) What kind of cost would a T3C with subsystems have after your change? The 40-50 mil mark sounds about right if it lands between T1 and navy cruisers. Quote: 2) What exactly do you mean by "mid range" cruiser work...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 13:46:29
|
85. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Beast of Revelations wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Not even baltec1s alliance will have use for T3Cs after the nerf he proposes. Maybe I'm wrong (correct me if so) - I'm not some big alliance military strategist ch...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 13:26:58
|
86. Super Battleships ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kronos does this job, it's a marauder.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 12:50:45
|
87. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: baltec1: I dont see much use or interest for T3Cs after your proposed changes. You yourself said you would not field any of them in your alliances fleets post-change. With your proposed removal of cloak/null and drop...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 12:26:27
|
88. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity wrote: The weapons systems are unimportant since they can easily be switched out. Feel free to explain to us how you are going to fit anything but missiles on a ship with missile slots. Quote: Your argument was the T3s are over...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 12:23:45
|
89. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: baltec1 wrote: Infinity wrote: Depends on range, speed, tackle and target. A brick tanked rail prot with an med afterburner is not the king of dictating range. You could just as easily fit rlml or ham. A battleship ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 12:03:06
|
90. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Link the Loki fit please. Also, Medium ACs application.... Don't have it on the phone so I'll have to post it later. I can answer the second part though. Bonused webs.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 11:27:52
|
91. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity wrote: Depends on range, speed, tackle and target. A brick tanked rail prot with an med afterburner is not the king of dictating range. You could just as easily fit rlml or ham. A battleship is just as susceptible to bombs, so what? ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 11:24:40
|
92. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jeremiah Saken wrote: Gimme Sake wrote: My good man, the whole scope of T3 rebalancing IS exactly large fleet combat not pve. I'm no saying we have to balance hull via pve, but my pve fitted gila was able to chase off the field proteus tha...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 11:16:31
|
93. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: baltec1 wrote: And the EFT shitfits start. I wonder how many will notice you called the first one a t1 cruise when it is in fact a pirate cruiser and has hard to source mods fitted. None of the ships you cooked up can ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 11:00:49
|
94. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I did
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 10:53:20
|
95. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gimme Sake wrote: Jeremiah Saken wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: I flew the Proteus almost exclusively for years and I don't think Baltec realises just how vulnerable it is with only 3 or 4 mids. Cap injector or web / scram, without the inje...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 10:34:03
|
96. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
And the EFT shitfits start. I wonder how many will notice you called the first one a t1 cruise when it is in fact a pirate cruiser and has hard to source mods fitted. None of the ships you cooked up can do the job of our proteus or legion.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 10:18:57
|
97. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: It makes no logical sense to have a ship that's between T1 and faction cruiser. It makes even less logical sense to have T3 destroyers in their position and T3 cruisers in that position. They made the exact same mis...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.23 17:37:10
|
98. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: If changes go through as baltec1 proposes, your T3Cs will be useless in WHs. You will be unable to clear content, and will lose to a Navy Cruiser in PVP. baltec1 wouldnt make these claims, unless he has reliable info t...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.23 13:55:28
|
99. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: This topic is hilarious. But what makes it even funnier, is that I doubt baltec1 would have the stones to argue this crap unless he already knew what he is saying is already impending. That concerns me,...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.23 13:48:50
|
100. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: You wanted this. Dont whine when you finally realize the repercussions of your selfish bias, rather than the good of the game. Apparently dropping a few thousand more players is worth it, as long as it makes you safer in ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.23 13:34:20
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |