Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
141. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Coralas wrote: Not only is that wrong, its not a rebuttal of the point. I do actually fly vexors. And people who didn't want the nano nerf flew battleships. You are one of those people that follow the FOTM and don't want to see it go even ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.19 15:29:17
|
142. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rroff wrote: baltec1 wrote: The only reason those ships are hamstrung is because T3C do the job so much better. Nope. Spent many many hours in those kind of engagements - most of the other "options" in the line for that role are too la...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.19 15:14:49
|
143. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rroff wrote: For a serious fleet role (rather than casual roams or throw away PVP, etc.) take that WTFPWNMOBILE off the table though and you are still left with options that are either hamstrung by the high bar for entry i.e. commandships or w...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.19 15:04:53
|
144. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Coralas wrote: I can't see the point to such a ship, if nothing else, we don't need more ships at that scale of hitpoints. That's because you wan't something horrendously overpowered not something handy. Coralas wrote: The drone va...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.19 14:12:45
|
145. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Coralas wrote: For the proteus, that would give you the option of a deimos that requires a whole new skill tree or a stratios that requires a whole new skill tree, level 5 skills and has no cargo capacity. More like between a thorax and a ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.19 11:20:55
|
146. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Khan Wrenth wrote: baltec1 wrote: The rigs were always a problem as you cant have a ship that can change on the fly when the rigs cant be removed so that was a much needed fix. Ah, one of my favorite forum regulars! Good to see you. I hav...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.19 00:44:29
|
147. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
There are several big issues with T3C. First is the number of bonuses they are getting ( averages out at 8 bonuses) with most being 10% per level. Second is the massive tanks they get coupled with the small cruiser sig and ability to run an AB...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.19 00:20:31
|
148. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Zanar Skwigelf wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: Was before you started playing and will be long after you've gone. Where have I heard that before? Oh. Right. Oops. (I was trying to find the post where Baltec1 caught the character s...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.04 04:17:45
|
149. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mr Mieyli wrote: baltec1 wrote: Mr Mieyli wrote: baltec1 wrote: The people that pvp are not the ones the have and still do demand the removal of other people's gameplay and content. That's your opinion man, I say that at times the g...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.03 13:22:48
|
150. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mr Mieyli wrote: baltec1 wrote: The people that pvp are not the ones the have and still do demand the removal of other people's gameplay and content. That's your opinion man, I say that at times the gameplay / content I want IS removed by...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.03 12:51:19
|
151. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mr Mieyli wrote: Lore is just backstory made up as justification you know. The lore could just as easily say that the empires are more powerful than capsuleers, but then how would you be the hero? It's amazing to me that somehow eves ego stroki...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.03 11:20:49
|
152. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: baltec1 wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: baltec1 wrote: In 2007 it was common to strip a thorax and insurance fraud it then buy a new one and insure again because you made a profit on the hull. In 2006 you could ma...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.03 08:53:10
|
153. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: baltec1 wrote: In 2007 it was common to strip a thorax and insurance fraud it then buy a new one and insure again because you made a profit on the hull. In 2006 you could make more money self destructing incursus (40...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.03 08:30:20
|
154. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: baltec1 wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: baltec1 wrote: It wasn't a bug and it went on for several years. Back then the insurance rate was fixed so movements in the mineral market were not taken into account. At that ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.03 08:07:08
|
155. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: baltec1 wrote: It wasn't a bug and it went on for several years. Back then the insurance rate was fixed so movements in the mineral market were not taken into account. At that time in EVE there was a huge supply spike i...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.03 07:46:21
|
156. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mr Epeen wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: I posted a quote which makes you look like a cherry picker. I don't know about being a cherry picker, but he must be in physical therapy from dragging the goal posts around so much. Mr Epeen I s...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.03 07:19:42
|
157. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It wasn't a bug and it went on for several years. Back then the insurance rate was fixed so movements in the mineral market were not taken into account. At that time in EVE there was a huge supply spike in minerals hitting the market which pushed ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.03 07:18:32
|
158. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: Rubbish. Tank is largely useless. Tank doubles align time meaning twice as much damage taken. Inertial stabs half it meaning its better to fit stabs. Its better to warp out faster with less tank. I have a jump freig...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.03 06:39:21
|
159. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: I think ganking was a lot less common when I first starting playing back in late 2005. In terms of per head of population it was more common back then, you just didn't see the number of threads being posted about it. Back then it wa...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.03 04:55:40
|
160. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: This is garbage. It was not programmed this way. When freighters came out you needed at least 30 battleships now you only need 12 stealth bombers. That would be because stealth bombers get battleship firepower and frei...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.03 04:11:23
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |