| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
61. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: baltec1, I am with a number of people who know you and respect you, however you know how easy it is to catch BR's with bubbles, seriously mate. Only the idiots that don't bother to even use bookmarks. A good BR pilot is incr...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.26 16:00:13
|
62. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: The key thing is that they have fitting options, make them nullified and covert and they are very ineffective. Better than their cov ops cruiser counterparts while also being near impossible to catch. Dracvlad wrote: ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.26 10:16:04
|
63. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
grgjegb gergerg wrote: Actual Idea, instead of bickering: Throw deployables at the problem? That's all the rage these days, isn't it? Have yet another deployable, anchorable ONLY in owned sovereign nullsec, that very slowly deals overheat dam...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.26 09:02:36
|
64. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Merin Ryskin wrote: If you're talking about brute force engagements then you don't need a cloak to bypass security. Brute force doesn't always work, lots of people use the cloak and nullification to get into a system then refit to combat....
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.26 08:58:26
|
65. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: Reaver Glitterstim wrote: Dracvlad wrote: When a T3C is fitted with a Nullified and covert subsystem enabling them to move around 0.0 with a lower level of risk it has to nerf the ship so it has less tank and less DPS. H...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.26 02:57:40
|
66. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Maria Dragoon wrote: I would like to see nullified blockade runner, it will give them a stronger use then going afk cloaked till all the bad guys log off. Do not do this. They warp cloaked, align like a frigate and warp as fast as interce...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.25 10:37:46
|
67. Gank Multiboxing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nevyn Auscent wrote: Anyone running multi boxing on that level is almost certainly using input broadcasting which is now banned. There are ways around it but it is far from easy.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.25 10:16:24
|
68. Jove battleship(SoCT). - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Much fuckery will be had with these.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.10 10:59:39
|
69. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Soldarius wrote: WTB pics of PL/Goons/"gangers" shooting plebes on bubbles in hi or losec. There are many "gangers" that think insta-warp nullified interceptors are pure AIDS and should never have been implemented, and/or anchorable bubbles ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.08 21:10:17
|
70. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mike Voidstar wrote: So, with a single neutral in space under a cloak the recommended response to 'counter' it is to get on comms with an alliance, keep a standing combat fleet, and remain constantly vigilant at all times, ready to evade as soo...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.07 21:17:24
|
71. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jeremiah Saken wrote: baltec1 wrote: That assumes T3C will stay expensive and keep the SP loss. Frankly, the cov ops and nullification is just one overpowered t3c ability out of a boatload of things about these ships that needs to be changed...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.04 11:01:46
|
72. High Sec Ganking - CONCORD Balance request - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Where is the evidence that the current system is unbalanced? This is what we want to see, and what the OP, NightmareX and yourself have so far failed to produce. If anything it can be argued that the balance is too...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.03 17:01:34
|
73. High Sec Ganking - CONCORD Balance request - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hiasa Kite wrote: I've witnessed the effect, but never thought about it actually being studied. Pretty terrifying, really. That it is.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.02 18:02:42
|
74. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Naye Nathaniel wrote: And now you gives as an argument why it should be changed; Cause you are also using a AFK Cloaking mechanic in your favor, and you even enjoy it as you "can't be touched" - GG you are blocked now too :) Him being a c...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.02 17:30:15
|
75. High Sec Ganking - CONCORD Balance request - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hiasa Kite wrote: Ima Wreckyou wrote: Naye Nathaniel wrote: "Clever gangers" should "feel" pain of ganging others in high sec than just ticklings... I bet you can't even list the current game mechanics behind ganking Is that really a ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.02 17:28:34
|
76. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Naye Nathaniel wrote: And now you gives as an argument why it should be changed; I'm not arguing to change anything.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.02 14:29:14
|
77. High Sec Ganking - CONCORD Balance request - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Naye Nathaniel wrote: Well i'm not a pussy to abuse a game mechanic (webbing a freighter is using a game mechanic for your favor - as it's an exploit) Using webs is now an exploit? Citation required. Naye Nathaniel wrote: Problem is st...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.02 14:24:37
|
78. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: Well you may be a in a bomber, but the other 28 are not... Still made me laugh, maybe I should unblock you because that is kinda funny ... I don't fit a cyno to my bombers, no room. So yea, if you can't handle me in a solo...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.02 13:23:44
|
79. High Sec Ganking - CONCORD Balance request - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Naye Nathaniel wrote: Oh yeah it's safe right.. BTW ganking is so much efficient that ppl even work at 11 accounts to gank ships: Bowhead down Obelisk down Charon down All of that in one single day; 3.2B items dropped; If its easy ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.02 11:07:00
|
80. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Naye Nathaniel wrote: Yeah and you want a ppl with a cloaker inside their system to brace themselves waiting hours as the cloaky guy decloak at front of them and lit a cyno so the fight can go on; As you see the guys docking in station with a ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.03.02 10:17:18
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |