Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
61. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
zbaaca wrote: jump freights . Probably a fair argument, citadels have made getting them around virtually risk free. zbaaca wrote: ceptors to ignore 95% of camps . To do so they have to be incredibly fragile which balances it out. ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.09 09:50:05
|
62. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Frostys Virpio wrote: Jeremiah Saken wrote: T3C are and will be special (like overpriced, and SP loss) that's why they get special abilities. They aren't that expensive if you consider what you get out of them. See this is why I wan...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.08 14:54:50
|
63. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Bromum Atom wrote: baltec1 wrote: So you should be able to just ignore someones defences? Sounds like you wan't an I win button. I told that. Dont know what you hear. You want camp gate killing t3 with you "win" button, but carriels still...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.08 14:54:02
|
64. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Bromum Atom wrote: Why they should get free killmail? Its only free if you let them win. Bromum Atom wrote: Or why I should logoff at camped system? You don't, you have a cov ops cloak, use it. Bromum Atom wrote: Why carrie...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.08 13:37:56
|
65. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Bromum Atom wrote: Why gate campers should be boosted? Ususally they dont want to pvp, they can only camp the gate and run when you start pew-pew with them. Why should you be able to ignore them?
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.08 12:18:34
|
66. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Omnathious Deninard wrote: With the expected nerfs to align time and sig resolution, nullification without cloak is probably a 100% chance of getting caught at a bubble camp. Sig increase isn't going to do much for catching them. You can clo...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.08 09:09:45
|
67. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Jeremiah Saken wrote: Bronson Hughes wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: In the current iteration of the subsystems the nullified sub has one less slot, and the covert ops sub has less raw hp. In order to maintain exploration viability they...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.07 21:31:40
|
68. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
zbaaca wrote: baltec1 wrote: Few things in my book that need addressing.. so you want to bring down ehp of t3 to t2 , meaning wh dudes will suffer , meaning to increasing cost , meaning basically removal of t3 from the field If you want...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.07 12:12:27
|
69. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Few things in my book that need addressing. Powergrid is way too high for a cruiser, for example. Proteus 1820 Thorax 1025 Exequror Navy Isuue 1038 Deimos 1313 Vigilant 1313 Talos 1375 Astarte 1688 A lot of the issues around T3C come from thi...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.07 10:48:25
|
70. ****PETITION**** FOR AFK CLOAKERS to LOG OR DECLOAK AFTER (X) TIME - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
AFK cloaking is the only counter to local.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.06 08:26:30
|
71. Sticky:[June] Nullsec Asteroid Cluster and Excavator Drone changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Minty Aroma wrote: This is a horrible change - EU TZ players will just mine out everything so US TZ players won't be able to mine... That's what you get for being a 3rd world nation.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.02 17:46:57
|
72. Idea: Auto logoff after 20-30 minutes of idle time - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kassimila wrote: perseus skye wrote: Personally a afk person is someone who can be found ,cloaked or not and killed where as someone logged off cannot be so it's a no from me . Example a cloaky camper managed to decloak while afk and my T1 ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.31 23:52:03
|
73. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mr Epeen wrote: Teckos Pech wrote: Never mind using the following rule: if it looks too good to be true it probably is. Aye. There's the rub. It doesn't have to look too good to be true. It just has to look like any one of the other th...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.31 23:42:14
|
74. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mike Voidstar wrote: You mean multiple people will track you as you move through systems, creating intel channels to support their operations? Yeah, see, that's called player effort. And its only counter is AFK cloaking. Mike Voidstar...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.31 18:39:49
|
75. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
April rabbit wrote: This story has no end (according to baltec): scammed person gets even and scammer loses his outpost. This was what i actually asked about. Thanks for the story. I'm sure there is a story about someone who got scammed a...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.31 17:43:25
|
76. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mr Epeen wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Cypherous wrote: Snip Result being never do business with an Upwell structure you do not own. Sure. Lets do that. It's what I do. I figure it's not what CCP intended for them, since it makes no s...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.31 16:50:55
|
77. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: baltec1 wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Dracvlad wrote: Null is actually fairly vibrant now with activity and it would be a shame to deliver all this stuff on a plate to the same alliances that made null such a boring ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.31 16:20:57
|
78. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Dracvlad wrote: Null is actually fairly vibrant now with activity and it would be a shame to deliver all this stuff on a plate to the same alliances that made null such a boring place prior to the change in sov mechanics...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.31 15:49:27
|
79. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
April rabbit wrote: So your "this mechanic existed in 0.0 sec for ten years" actually shows that these scams were working perfectly without any danger to scammers. That's what i was suspecting but hoped for other outcome. Thanks The dang...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.31 15:41:13
|
80. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mr Epeen wrote: Mr Epeen The contract market and the fact that looking at completed contracts over the last few days shows a huge number of completed contracts to citadels. Also the utter lack of evidence people are avoiding shipping to...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.31 15:38:17
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |