Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
781. Newborn here...Please, I need your help. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nowhere is safe in EVE, highsec space is safer than everywhere else due to Concord retaliation but expect to die if you do something daft like stuff a billion isk worth of cargo in an untanked hauler. Google EVE uni. Lots of info for you to chew ...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.16 07:06:27
|
782. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bronson Hughes wrote: Shesuj Shayiskhun wrote: So far the dominix and megathrons are doing very well in pvp. 'Geddons too. All of them do well, even the rokh which is still lord of the pipe bomb. The problem comes when you get people w...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.16 06:58:55
|
783. Sticky:[November] Orca Changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Anne Sol wrote: so 250mil for killing 700mil worth ship? I call it fair game then. Now calculate the profit to be made on such a gank.
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.15 19:06:10
|
784. Sticky:[November] Orca Changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
You do realise that km get posted anyway these days. I haven't manually posted a mail for several years now even on my NPC alts.
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.14 19:16:01
|
785. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: People saying they are overpowered doesn't mean they are overpowered. Proof is required and you have supplied none. I supplied lots. You provided a bunch of poorly fitted ships. I provided a ship that is better than the Impe...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.14 17:39:12
|
786. Sticky:[November] Orca Changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Mark O'Helm wrote: baltec1 wrote: Mark O'Helm wrote: But there are fleets of 10 cats ganking skiffs in hs. So, who knows. 5 so far this month. Not exactly a large number given the amount of skiffs out there. there is an 12 man NPC f...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.14 17:26:18
|
787. Sticky:[November] Orca Changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Mark O'Helm wrote: But there are fleets of 10 cats ganking skiffs in hs. So, who knows. 5 so far this month. Not exactly a large number given the amount of skiffs out there.
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.14 11:49:09
|
788. Sticky:[Ascension] Tactical Destroyer and Small Artillery balance updat... - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Viriato Legionis wrote: Hi there, in short; I don-Št like the changes, this time you nerfed the Svipul badly , you pretty much went with those pilots asking for Tactical D nerfs and with those TD pilots flying non Mimmatar variants. Of course ...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.14 11:42:47
|
789. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: "We" as in just you. Everyone in this thread says they are overpowered. CCP says they are overpowered. So yea, its just you. Steffles wrote: You gave no actual argument basically because you don't have one. Aside fr...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.14 09:38:08
|
790. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: Nah not really. The onyx can get a battleship tank. Its a cruiser. The Eagle can get a battleship tank its a cruiser. Battlecruisers can get battleship tanks, actually as I demonstrated they get a hell of a lot more than both b...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.13 14:02:04
|
791. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: They're not pocket battleships. As I've demonstrated they are in line with HP of battle cruisers , interdiction cruisers and some of the heavy assault cruisers and command ships which are also cruisers . You'd have to nerf...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.13 09:22:11
|
792. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: The reason nobody is flying them is because there is no T3C emergency and there is no need to have 150k ehp cruisers to counter your fantasy of the T3C emergency. We dont want 130k ehp cruisers to counter T3C we want T3C to...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.12 23:09:01
|
793. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: 600 dps. It fields 5 med drones. That get left behind with the first tactical warp. Steffles wrote: Heres 3 more for you. Damnation - 190k ehp (more than both your Prot and Battleship), 240k ehp if you add a links ...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.12 21:12:58
|
794. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: 575 Prot vs 609 Brutix - It has more dps. 480 for the brutix. Steffles wrote: Brutix can fit both rails AND blasters. There is a reason why nobody used med blasters in large fleet actions. Steffles wrote: The Pr...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.12 19:19:18
|
795. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: Has more dps. 100 less DPS. Steffles wrote: Its slightly slower but given the web twice as fast in web range. With a tracking disruptor in close your Proteus is hitting for half the damage its hitting for, at mid ra...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.12 17:12:42
|
796. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: So cheaper than the T3, more dps, twice as much cargo, 30k less tank but 224 armor reps x number of ships in fleet, discounting any logi. Has utiliity for web (fitted) or tracking disruptor, damps etc etc, better range, slight...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.11 10:42:13
|
797. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lan Wang wrote: its not really cheaper though, if you die you're adding an injector on top of that. Who bothers with that? You generally have the time between these fights to get that skill back. We still have a cruiser that thinks its a ...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.10 11:14:47
|
798. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steffles wrote: Show me a T3C that doesn't use oversized modules that is overpowered. I'd be interested to see one. [Megathron, Baltec Fleet] Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Damage Control II Imperial Navy 1600mm Steel Plates Imperial Navy 1...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.10 11:01:46
|
799. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lan Wang wrote: im seeing less and less t3c fleets going around these days... The breakup of the old empires means a lot have moved around and money has been more tight. Now that people are getting settled expect them to come back. They ha...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.09 09:42:38
|
800. Why Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Spoken like someone who doesn't fly battleships. Now lets look at the meta out there. If you want a battleship fleet you turn to T3C because they are faster, tank more, get better tracking and a so forth. People are not using battleships not bec...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.11.09 09:35:58
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |