Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
101. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Khara Hirl wrote: Why are you in a thread as a moderator having an opinion? Personally the company that I am from where I am a Senior Game Master we tell our GM's not to post on opinion threads because it makes the company look back or it lo...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.28 10:08:36
|
102. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scialt wrote: You seriously view a scam as... content? Ooookay..... Of course it is, someone is getting a great deal of gameplay out of baiting and trapping people via this scam. That's content. Scialt wrote: I mean I don't really c...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.25 20:46:29
|
103. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scialt wrote: The dynamics changed because with citadels, deliveries could be contracted to player owned structures outside of Null. Other than Providence (and maybe a couple of other places I'm not aware of) most player owned stations are p...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.24 20:16:03
|
104. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scialt wrote: But delivering a contract when the person locks you out of the delivery destination... is not possible at all. A thing that has happened from the dawn of owing a station out in null, why should anything change now especially...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.24 18:41:49
|
105. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scialt wrote: Yes. They'll feel better. They still lost the collateral. And unlike the person who took the contract... those defending the citadel have a chance to defend the citadel. The hauler doesn't have any opportunity to deliver the go...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.24 18:15:06
|
106. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scialt wrote: Tricia Killnu wrote: The citadel in question that's part of the scam can be destroyed. Go destroy it. Get someone to destroy it. PVP Content I just gave you Please send me isk for such ideas you are all sweet things and...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.24 18:08:43
|
107. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gimme Sake wrote: baltec1 wrote: There are lists of trustworthy and not trustworthy groups/players and stations available. You can always produce a list of your own and take those risks too. We have been dealing with this sort of scam for ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.24 17:29:12
|
108. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gimme Sake wrote: Keno Skir wrote: What like the one i've explained three times, just look back it's really easy.. I understand your point about allowing citadel access. But... What some people in this thread advice is "The counter is...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.24 12:08:24
|
109. Breaking News: Citadel/Plex Contracting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This has been the case with null outposts for over a decade, why should the game change to protect people unwilling to take a loss when they take a risk?
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.24 11:11:55
|
110. Sticky:Forming the Strategic Cruiser Focus Group - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I'd like to sign up to toss my pennies around on these ships. I have experience with T3C from the dark days of the super drake (tengu from drakefleet days) right up to today's AHAC fleets. Flown with them in both large and small fleets and in a r...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.23 17:53:44
|
111. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Xcom wrote: If you ever end up playing a PC game to the point where you have to keep your PC running for months just to win in a virtual reality then sh*ts gotten real. How about fixing the game so that you don't have to keep your PC runn...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.09 10:48:31
|
112. Best solo PvE fitting for Gallente Battleship - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Magnus Jax wrote: [Hyperion, Missions Named] Core X-Type Large Armor Repairer Imperial Navy Armor Thermal Hardener Armor Thermal Hardener II Armor Kinetic Hardener II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field St...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.09 09:59:16
|
113. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Cade Windstalker wrote: Snip 1) SP loss: The SP loss itself is the same for everyone. Replacing it with injectors is currently less efficient for older players, than newer. If SP loss is removed, this disparity is a...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.09 08:56:40
|
114. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'm not against change I just don't see a way to get a change through without an almighty ***** fest. You can't kill AFK cloaking alone because that hands risk free ratting to the pve mob. 100% accurate free and instant intel with no counter wou...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.08 23:47:57
|
115. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Max Deveron wrote: since i posted..... You know what I am hearing here? I am hearing...... Waaah Waaah I can not travel for solo killing in nullsec. WaaaahaaaWaaahh I can not get my blops team to drop on someone. You know what, Wah Wah Wah.....
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.08 19:07:30
|
116. PI clickfest is physically dangerous - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nicolai Serkanner wrote: guigui lechat wrote: Julanna Egnald wrote: Just as an aside, I was thinking that if the PI UI is painful, then DOTAs and RTS's must be out of the question, at least any kind of serious gameplay I dont click on ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.08 18:50:51
|
117. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Taliyah Riraille wrote: I couldn't find this idea anywhere (not that I looked very hard lel) but maybe make a cyno interfere with a cloak in the same way as a second cloak and vice versa (even if one is offline). That way if the shrodingers cam...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.08 14:08:46
|
118. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: There are ways to get around local based intel and it requires people to actually report stuff. There are no ways around local, you cannot stop yourself from showing up in local the instant you enter the system. As for the s...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.08 14:04:17
|
119. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Continued... ^ TLDR: -SP loss is a core mechanic on T3Cs that offsets the practical value of versatility from refitting subsystems. SP loss was put in to try to justify T3C power. Remove that power and you have no exc...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.08 13:58:03
|
120. PI clickfest is physically dangerous - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You click more in any FPS or RTS game.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.05.08 10:57:18
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |