Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
1181. Using a DST's fleet hangar to scoop gank loot needs rebalancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Faylee Freir wrote: Sure thats an option, but I think the DST's fleet hangar has legit usefullness outside of looting gank wrecks. The balancing issues surrounding the DST isnt relevant here when you start bringing up the fact that it can't be...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 16:02:36
|
1182. Why do people assume how we play the game reflects us in real life? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Linus Gorp wrote: Want some advice? Arguing with Lucas isn't going to get you anywhere. You can throw all the facts you want in his face. You can show him indisputable evidence. He's still going to keep arguing for his narrow-minded point of v...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 15:59:31
|
1183. to gank or not to gank come november - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frankly I'm looking forwards to the army of AFK campers that are about to descend upon nullsec.
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 15:01:50
|
1184. Using a DST's fleet hangar to scoop gank loot needs rebalancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Faylee Freir wrote: baltec1 wrote: Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: But again this isn't about ganking and freighters. It's about a way to work around the crim watch system. A system that was put in place so that actions would have easily predictab...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 15:00:27
|
1185. Using a DST's fleet hangar to scoop gank loot needs rebalancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Faylee Freir wrote: Teckos Pech wrote: Faylee Freir wrote: It doesnt matter who it nerfs or buffs. Its a bad mechanic that needs to be looked at. The fact that gankers primarilly use it doesnt matter. If there were another activity that ...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 14:50:32
|
1186. Sticky:[September] Mining Barge and Exhumer tweaks - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: Ratting titans don't have to immobolise themselves, and also can't be tackled with a single long point. They do when the fire the doomsday and if you are going after a titan then bubbles are going to be involved.
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 14:46:19
|
1187. Why do people assume how we play the game reflects us in real life? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Because it was a younger game still in it's natural growth cycle. You're literally stating that you think masses of people only stayed playing this game because gankers exist, and you provide absolutely no evidence to that. ...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 14:40:37
|
1188. Why do people assume how we play the game reflects us in real life? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: Eve lost a certain type of player during that period and that loss was hidden by the new players that were brought in with major battles, CCP did not analyse their database properly and was unaware of that lost player base. I ...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 14:17:10
|
1189. Why do people assume how we play the game reflects us in real life? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: More like what I saw coming to pass, bored players looking to kill something from a rapidly disappearing casual population, enjoy what you made of Eve you egotistical loser. In other words what was left in hisec suffered an...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 13:58:06
|
1190. Using a DST's fleet hangar to scoop gank loot needs rebalancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Not sure they really did considering there are still people who cargo fit them They tend to get called plonkers. Adding cargo extenders to a 3k hold when you have a built in 60k hold isn't something most of us are ...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 13:38:25
|
1191. to gank or not to gank come november - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Do Little wrote: Allowing Alphas to multibox and turn off their safety in highsec has considerable potential for abuse. Perhaps CCP can give them the ability to do one or the other but not both. I.e. if they multibox, their safety will be locke...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 13:17:29
|
1192. Why do people assume how we play the game reflects us in real life? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: And it may be hey make similar mistakes here, but as of yet it seem the choices they've implemented are fine. The lower retention and sudden discovery that people who pvp stay longer would say otherwise. Lucas Kell wrote:...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 12:28:47
|
1193. to gank or not to gank come november - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
DeMichael Crimson wrote: So you want to fight on the good side ? Then just gank the gankers. DMC They are profitable to gank after all.
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 12:05:20
|
1194. Remove the killmail API, seriously! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Major Xadi wrote: baltec1 wrote: The cowards who avoid PvP now are the same cowards that avoided PvP before killmails existed. Aw, c'mon now. Surely CCP has retained the subscriptions of some new cowards by now. But kinda on topic, I...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 11:38:27
|
1195. Using a DST's fleet hangar to scoop gank loot needs rebalancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
FT Diomedes wrote: baltec1 wrote: Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: But again this isn't about ganking and freighters. It's about a way to work around the crim watch system. A system that was put in place so that actions would have easily predictabl...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 11:33:20
|
1196. Using a DST's fleet hangar to scoop gank loot needs rebalancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Brokk Witgenstein wrote: Teckos Pech wrote: baltec1 wrote: Stick your cargo into a freight container and this can't be pulled. Also it increases the risk for the gankers. If I put all my stuff in one freight container and then it is 50...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 11:30:44
|
1197. Sticky:[September] Mining Barge and Exhumer tweaks - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Drago Shouna wrote: baltec1 wrote: Resa Moon wrote: Thanks for speaking on behalf of miners. What miners are concerned about is the reasonable relationship between risk and reward. Seems that some folks think mining vessels should be ...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 11:21:48
|
1198. Sticky:[September] Mining Barge and Exhumer tweaks - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Resa Moon wrote: baltec1 wrote: Resa Moon wrote: You either miss the point or are simply trolling. Because it might be able to go toe-to-toe with a particular gang size and composition doesn't mean the risk becomes reasonable because fo...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 11:20:34
|
1199. Why do people assume how we play the game reflects us in real life? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: CCP nerfing it isn't evidence enough? Take part in it one day and you'll see how easy the activity is. This is supposed to be a hard game, remember? These are the same people who added things such as the Svipul, tracking ti...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 11:13:59
|
1200. Why do people assume how we play the game reflects us in real life? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Drago Shouna wrote: "Actually CCP has said that ganking has no impact on numbers and if anything is good for player retention." Well myself and lots of others have never believed that comment, yes I saw him make it, but I still think there wa...
- by baltec1 - at 2016.09.18 11:04:43
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |