Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 [600] 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
11981. this kind of thing is probably serious - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'll sell my shirt for a grilled cheese.
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.04 09:30:00
|
11982. How will the redistribution of moon material effect the current political situat... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Poverty.
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.04 08:40:00
|
11983. New star trek and ship battles. - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
something is wrong with our bloody ships today!
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.04 08:24:00
|
11984. War Declarations need Reform - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Prototype SV-17 wrote: How do you avoid a war dec? This is not possible as far as I know. You cannot do this as far as I know. There is a certain amount of time you must remain in the corp before you can leave once the corp has been war de...
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 22:43:00
|
11985. 30 days of service. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: Did somebody call the Whaaaaaaaaambulance? I guess being forced to go out and have a life for a while must have hurt some people. I just painted a room
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 22:04:00
|
11986. CCP please do not compensate !!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marzsy vox wrote: You think you sound smart but you offer no argument to support your conclusion. You're a child. This from someone demanding free stuff because CCP was attacked...
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 21:56:00
|
11987. CCP please do not compensate !!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nexus Day wrote: One of the features of the game, touted repeatedly, is the ability to train 24/7 without being online. Did a player stop their skill queue Sunday or did CCP, following their protocol, bring the servers down? Our EULA does not c...
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 21:48:00
|
11988. Blockade runner unscannable hold follow-up - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I don't see why they felt this was needed. The ship is unscannable anyway when its cloaked.
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 21:45:00
|
11989. CCP please do not compensate !!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marzsy vox wrote: You're very dumb and should stop talking. Seriously. Stop. First understand what a DDoS is and then understand what it takes to pull one off. Compensation IS needed. Their fault or not. The service I pay for, was interrupted...
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 21:40:00
|
11990. War Declarations need Reform - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why can a corp avoid a wardec at no cost or drawback? Why can players drop corp and enter another the second a wardec lands at no cost or hassle? Wardecs are indeed broken but not in the way the OP thinks
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 21:32:00
|
11991. Eve Offline Over Weekend - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP should give us nothing to end all of these entitlement posts.
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 21:24:00
|
11992. Just a note to avoid Sendaya at the moment (currently 20:36 Eve Time) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
100 you say...
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 20:40:00
|
11993. Why is there no way for us to attack supply lines in eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: "-geared towards t2" Any expanding on this idea you will just have to ask the devs, because I do not se anything mentioning T1 at all, and only mention of T2. _edited to add the note that I'm not a dev so can only read ...
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 19:15:00
|
11994. Trade Hubs and Sharding - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No.
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 19:10:00
|
11995. Why is there no way for us to attack supply lines in eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: You read 1 line of that section. Keep reading. You will have to point this out to me because I see nothing at all that says t1 hulls will not be built in 0.0
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 18:59:00
|
11996. Why is there no way for us to attack supply lines in eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Stonecrusher Mortlock wrote: You do know you you could just go shoo them in low sec? If the change happened. 99% of freighter trips will continue to happen in high sec. You killed freighter ganking. Stonecrusher Mortlock wrote: N...
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 18:53:00
|
11997. Why is there no way for us to attack supply lines in eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: Well, concerning most people using that board as some sort of proof can't read, that's one reason. The fact you have people saying "null should be 99% efficient) when the focus is on T2, not T1, and all they do is mention...
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 18:39:00
|
11998. Why is there no way for us to attack supply lines in eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Stonecrusher Mortlock wrote: How? you mean the high sec Freighter ganking community? Most of them only gank because there's no effective way to pin someone with a war dec and make it stick. AND they can still gank everything thing else. We...
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 18:12:00
|
11999. Why is there no way for us to attack supply lines in eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Stonecrusher Mortlock wrote: Pure lies, ever word of it, even if they ARE in player corps, you have all the tools at your fingertips to make it safe to keep running the items you need, if your war deced, you leave corp or Move to a none war ...
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 17:18:00
|
12000. Why is there no way for us to attack supply lines in eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Stonecrusher Mortlock wrote: HURR DUURR HURRR, if you don't have all of the info but out, if you had looked you would see that person was trying to say O NO ONE USED NPC CORP because then we cant dock at are null stations. I had to point out ...
- by baltec1 - at 2013.06.03 16:47:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 [600] 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |