| Pages: [1] |
1. New Dev Blog: Speed Rebalanced by Nozh - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Nyphur Thinking over some of the proposals, they make a shitload of sense. THe microwarpdrive was always intended to be a short burst thing for closing the gap in between you and your target. It wasn't really intended to be ...
- by d026 - at 2008.07.31 15:07:00
|
2. New Dev Blog: Speed Rebalanced by Nozh - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Nyphur Thinking over some of the proposals, they make a shitload of sense. THe microwarpdrive was always intended to be a short burst thing for closing the gap in between you and your target. It wasn't really intended to be ...
- by d026 - at 2008.07.31 15:07:00
|
3. Epic Win! A New Exploration (and other stuff) Blog by Greyscale - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
NICE!
- by d026 - at 2007.10.26 03:41:00
|
4. Tech II ships coming in Trinity, new Dev Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Kagura Nikon remembers there is more PVE than lvl 4 missions. There are complexes and level 5 that are very hard for a signle raen to tank. tanking complexes (in deep space) in a 1bil slow as hell bs is suicide. also y...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.25 11:54:00
|
5. Tech II ships coming in Trinity, new Dev Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
After further examination of the Golem i really have to ask you: Why does the Golem do less DPS than its T1 counterpart missing a lowslot and 2 turret hardpoints?
- by d026 - at 2007.10.24 19:06:00
|
6. Tech II ships coming in Trinity, new Dev Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Mack Dorgeans Originally by: d026 Edited by: d026 on 24/10/2007 16:12:56 Originally by: Mack Dorgeans By the way, despite all the whines and complaints in this thread, a T2 Raven or Mega, or whatever is g...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.24 17:17:00
|
7. Tech II ships coming in Trinity, new Dev Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 24/10/2007 16:12:56 Originally by: Mack Dorgeans By the way, despite all the whines and complaints in this thread, a T2 Raven or Mega, or whatever is going to be in high demand, and you can expect them to cost quite ...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.24 16:12:00
|
8. Tech II ships coming in Trinity, new Dev Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Solant Originally by: Carniflex Golem does less dps than CNR :/ as CNR has RoF bonus and 7 launchers while Golem has 8 'effective' turrets. I'd love to know why you figured it would have more dps than the CNR. If...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.24 01:54:00
|
9. Tech II ships coming in Trinity, new Dev Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Solant Originally by: Carniflex Golem does less dps than CNR :/ as CNR has RoF bonus and 7 launchers while Golem has 8 'effective' turrets. I'd love to know why you figured it would have more dps than the CNR. If...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.24 01:51:00
|
10. New Dev Blog, Nozh on Carriers Redux, Part II - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 24/10/2007 01:02:57 1 damp frig 2 damps = 15k lockrange chimera. add anotehr damp whooha = 9k lockrange!
- by d026 - at 2007.10.24 01:02:00
|
11. Tech II ships coming in Trinity, new Dev Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 24/10/2007 00:34:29 Originally by: Kagura Nikon Originally by: d026 Edited by: d026 on 23/10/2007 23:51:16 i just ran some numbers trough eft: golem dps (missiles only + 4 x dg bcu): 698 golem dps (+dro...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.24 00:33:00
|
12. Tech II ships coming in Trinity, new Dev Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 23/10/2007 23:51:16 i just ran some numbers trough eft: golem dps (missiles only + 4 x dg bcu): 698 golem dps (+drones): 929 cnr dps (missiles only + 4 x dg bcu): 815 dps cnr dps (+ drones and 425mm II): 1009 dps why in...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.23 23:49:00
|
13. Tech II ships coming in Trinity, new Dev Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
thank god i haven't sold my cnr yet. the golem looks completely awefull. and im definitely gonna stick witch my cnr:)
- by d026 - at 2007.10.23 21:25:00
|
14. New Staff, New Blog, New Information on Encounters! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quote: My take is that the ideal situation would be one in which small PvP gangs can actually go out and find other small PvP gangs to engage rather than being reduced to just hunting NPCers - more challenge, more adrenaline, more fun. How w...
- by d026 - at 2007.06.04 01:17:00
|
15. Bloggers #54, So my Agent called and has this "offer I can't refuse.." - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quote: dont remove the bounties unless you intend to make them more likely to drop modules that i can sell, a 425mm railgun 1 just doesnt sell on the market and i have a ****load of them, i usually just melt em and make more missles for my r...
- by d026 - at 2007.03.07 13:56:00
|
16. Bloggers #54, So my Agent called and has this "offer I can't refuse.." - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quote: Well the CNRs and their ilk are the source of the problem imho. If you take all remotely challenging and profitable L4s out of highsec, what is there left to do for those of us who enjoy fighting NPCs with these babies, but do not enj...
- by d026 - at 2007.02.23 14:44:00
|
17. Bloggers #54, So my Agent called and has this "offer I can't refuse.." - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quote: here also is zilch benefit in skilling your main character as a support ship pilot, because there is no NEED for that kinda thing in pve. and in pvp, yet another battleship will do just fine. its nice to have a supportcruiser-alt to t...
- by d026 - at 2007.02.23 14:36:00
|
18. Bloggers #53, Inventions, the Lottery System and a Call for Feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
i really dont understand why you want to stop seeding bpos but then not removing the existing ones. this completely makes no sense to me. if you going to introduce the invention/reverse engeneering the only way to get 2t bpos why should there be a...
- by d026 - at 2007.02.22 13:32:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |