| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
81. Need for anti-missile ewar - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
deffenders should be tweaked a bit i agree.. but we dont need a new module.
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 02:08:00
|
82. question about deimos - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
ohh my dps numbers are not correct.. i did use my alts skills not lvl V.. here is another one 800mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Armor Explosive Hardener...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 01:52:00
|
83. question about deimos - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
another setup that could work: Medium Armor Repairer II Medium Armor Repairer II Damage Control II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Armor Explosive Hardener II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II 10MN MicroWarpdrive II Faint Epsilon Warp Prohibitor ...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 01:47:00
|
84. question about deimos - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
actually a 1600 plate gives you almost the equivalent of 2,5 minutes worth of armorepping. probably we should test this out: 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Damage Control II Armor Kinetic Hardener II Armor Thermic Hardener II Armor Ex...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 01:43:00
|
85. The actual problem with marauders : they're NOT the best missionrunner - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 28/10/2007 10:01:56 Originally by: Akita T That's exactly what I was saying to "TradeUnion first", in a sarcastic manner i should probably work on my english skills:)
- by d026 - at 2007.10.28 10:01:00
|
86. The actual problem with marauders : they're NOT the best missionrunner - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 28/10/2007 09:01:13 Originally by: Akita T You can already do L4s in a Drake, which is cheaper as a normal Raven ? Why get in a Raven for that ? You can do it in a T2 Raven, why buy a CNR and faction-fit it ? You're ...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.28 09:00:00
|
87. The actual problem with marauders : they're NOT the best missionrunner - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Kerfira While the Golem might suck in a damage sense against faction fitted CNR's, it is probably on par with a T2 fitted CNR. The reason for this is that it'll be easier to tank well. A T2 fitted CNR has a hard time keeping...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.27 18:59:00
|
88. Relatively safe Raven setup for small/medium size 0.0 PVP gang. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 27/10/2007 16:04:09 if you fit T1 you probably wont help your survivability anyway.. Some setups i like: Torp: Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II 1600mm Reinforced Rolle...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.27 16:02:00
|
89. The actual problem with marauders : they're NOT the best missionrunner - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 27/10/2007 14:52:19 Originally by: Qui Shon Because they can tank better, and spare slots for opening cans. you can tank all plexes just fine in a cerb or nighthawk with all the essential hacking/salvage/archeol...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.27 14:49:00
|
90. Drakes and ravens in PvP? Thoughts? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
After the next patch the Raven will gain some soloabilityb but itwont really be perfect at it. Still it will be a dps monster everybody should have some in gang:) The drake/ferox i never liked thus my BC skill is still on lvl 2 and im not gonna ch...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.27 14:48:00
|
91. The actual problem with marauders : they're NOT the best missionrunner - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Qui Shon Originally by: Akita T Originally by: Qui Shon Well, however you want to interpret it There's no "interpretation", the words are as clear as they could be. The Marauders are ships that were supp...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.27 11:30:00
|
92. The actual problem with marauders : they're NOT the best missionrunner - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 27/10/2007 11:12:17 Actually its quite simple what a mission runner wants: High Alpha to one volley as much cruiser/bc's as possible. Fast ROF. If you kill fast you dont have to tank long.
- by d026 - at 2007.10.27 11:11:00
|
93. The actual problem with marauders : they're NOT the best missionrunner - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T The Golem in particular isn't a step forward for such mission runners, it's a step back in this particular aspect. And i'd like to add that probably exactely those mission runners are those who gonna be able to ...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.26 13:53:00
|
94. Active tanking in PvP - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
But then you would have survived with a buffer tank anyway:)
- by d026 - at 2007.10.26 13:47:00
|
95. Golem, Missionrunners wet Dream? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Qui Shon Originally by: d026 in lvl 5's the tank often has ZERO cap due to insane energy neut sentry spam.. so not a wise idea to atempt to active tank there.. But how is the damage distributed among ships? ...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.25 14:59:00
|
96. Golem, Missionrunners wet Dream? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Qui Shon Originally by: Shiken Kan i'm no big missionrunner, but won't these ships be nice in a gang running lvl 5 missis and turtletank? Most certainly. And NOS/Neut for PvP. Say, a 4-5 slot tank, 3xBCU, rest ...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.25 14:34:00
|
97. Golem, Missionrunners wet Dream? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 25/10/2007 13:14:35 Fit 3 large smartbombs on the Golem then It's got much better cap recharge as a Raven/CNR (+5.88 maxcap, -20% cap recharge time but -1 rigslot yet can fit 2xCCC-II, -1...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.25 13:34:00
|
98. Golem, Missionrunners wet Dream? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 25/10/2007 13:31:45 Originally by: Shaemell Buttleson Originally by: d026 Edited by: d026 on 25/10/2007 12:37:49 Edited by: d026 on 25/10/2007 12:36:02 Originally by: Akita T Originally b...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.25 13:31:00
|
99. The actual problem with marauders : they're NOT the best missionrunner - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 25/10/2007 12:43:01 Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 25/10/2007 12:39:27 Originally by: Qui Shon Devblogs specifically said, don't call it a mission ship. Your premise, your wishes, your com...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.25 12:41:00
|
100. Golem, Missionrunners wet Dream? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 25/10/2007 12:37:49 Edited by: d026 on 25/10/2007 12:36:02 Originally by: Akita T Originally by: d026 akita a t1 raven is outdpsing the golem (1 more low 2 turret hp): raven dps (dg cms, 5 x dg bcu): 535 ...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.25 12:32:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |